[blfs-dev] LibreOffice-3.5.0.3

2012-03-11 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
Andrew, Ken, editors, Perhaps, you can find this post useful to help replacing OpenOffice by LibreOffice. After my last post to blfs-book I felt that I should have been more helpful, but in the hurry... I hesitated if this should be sent to book or dev. Please, find attached a page I edited an

[blfs-dev] shadow 4.1.5 update

2012-03-11 Thread Armin K.
As you can see I've updated shadow package today. But that's not all. I've also modified some instructions and probably simplified environment configuration. I'd like someone to test it and report any errors if encountered. Also, I noticed there is pam_securetty module, and according to that mo

Re: [blfs-dev] shadow 4.1.5 update

2012-03-11 Thread Uwe Düffert
Hi, On Sun, 11 Mar 2012, Armin K. wrote: > Also, I noticed there is pam_securetty module, and > according to that module documentation, it looks for /etc/securetty file > to check from which tty's is root user allowed to login. But grepping > through book I don't see where is that file created, n

Re: [blfs-dev] shadow 4.1.5 update

2012-03-11 Thread Andrew Benton
On Sun, 11 Mar 2012 13:18:16 + "Armin K." wrote: > Also, I noticed there is pam_securetty module, and > according to that module documentation, it looks for /etc/securetty file > to check from which tty's is root user allowed to login. If a malicious hacker has physical access to the machi

Re: [blfs-dev] shadow 4.1.5 update

2012-03-11 Thread Armin K.
On 03/11/2012 02:47 PM, Andrew Benton wrote: > On Sun, 11 Mar 2012 13:18:16 + > "Armin K." wrote: > >> Also, I noticed there is pam_securetty module, and >> according to that module documentation, it looks for /etc/securetty file >> to check from which tty's is root user allowed to login. > >

Re: [blfs-dev] shadow 4.1.5 update

2012-03-11 Thread Qrux
On Mar 11, 2012, at 6:54 AM, Armin K. wrote: > On 03/11/2012 02:47 PM, Andrew Benton wrote: >> On Sun, 11 Mar 2012 13:18:16 + >> "Armin K." wrote: >> >>> Also, I noticed there is pam_securetty module, and >>> according to that module documentation, it looks for /etc/securetty file >>> to ch

Re: [blfs-dev] shadow 4.1.5 update

2012-03-11 Thread Armin K.
On 03/11/2012 03:33 PM, Qrux wrote: > > On Mar 11, 2012, at 6:54 AM, Armin K. wrote: > >> On 03/11/2012 02:47 PM, Andrew Benton wrote: >>> On Sun, 11 Mar 2012 13:18:16 + >>> "Armin K." wrote: >>> Also, I noticed there is pam_securetty module, and according to that module documentati

Re: [blfs-dev] shadow 4.1.5 update

2012-03-11 Thread Qrux
On Mar 11, 2012, at 7:47 AM, Armin K. wrote: > On 03/11/2012 03:33 PM, Qrux wrote: >> >> On Mar 11, 2012, at 6:54 AM, Armin K. wrote: >> >>> On 03/11/2012 02:47 PM, Andrew Benton wrote: On Sun, 11 Mar 2012 13:18:16 + "Armin K." wrote: > Also, I noticed there is pam_sec

[blfs-dev] Gnome 3 Report

2012-03-11 Thread Armin K.
Hello there. Here are some Gnome recommendations. First and one that has been disturbing me since first time I tried to build gnome with BLFS instructions (where I always failed, of course) is Let's remove $GNOME_SYSCONFDIR ... Let everything be installed in /etc, not in /etc/gnome/version. Bel

Re: [blfs-dev] shadow 4.1.5 update

2012-03-11 Thread Armin K.
On 03/11/2012 04:01 PM, Qrux wrote: > > On Mar 11, 2012, at 7:47 AM, Armin K. wrote: > >> On 03/11/2012 03:33 PM, Qrux wrote: >>> >>> On Mar 11, 2012, at 6:54 AM, Armin K. wrote: >>> On 03/11/2012 02:47 PM, Andrew Benton wrote: > On Sun, 11 Mar 2012 13:18:16 + > "Armin K."wrote

Re: [blfs-dev] Gnome 3 Report

2012-03-11 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Armin K. wrote: > Hello there. Here are some Gnome recommendations. > > First and one that has been disturbing me since first time I tried to > build gnome with BLFS instructions (where I always failed, of course) is > > Let's remove $GNOME_SYSCONFDIR ... Let everything be installed in /etc, >

Re: [blfs-dev] Gnome 3 Report

2012-03-11 Thread Andrew Benton
On Sun, 11 Mar 2012 15:49:44 + "Armin K." wrote: > Hello there. Here are some Gnome recommendations. > > First and one that has been disturbing me since first time I tried to > build gnome with BLFS instructions (where I always failed, of course) is > > Let's remove $GNOME_SYSCONFDIR ... L

Re: [blfs-dev] Gnome 3 Report

2012-03-11 Thread Andrew Benton
On Sun, 11 Mar 2012 15:49:44 + "Armin K." wrote: > Fifth one is also about Gnome 3.4. I think that I've also mentioned this > one, but let's revise. Gnome 3.4 has been working on replacing > ConsoleKit sessin management with systemd one. Of course, ConsoleKit can > still be used. Now, I am

Re: [blfs-dev] Gnome 3 Report

2012-03-11 Thread Armin K.
On 03/11/2012 06:36 PM, Andrew Benton wrote: > On Sun, 11 Mar 2012 15:49:44 + > "Armin K." wrote: > >> Fifth one is also about Gnome 3.4. I think that I've also mentioned this >> one, but let's revise. Gnome 3.4 has been working on replacing >> ConsoleKit sessin management with systemd one. Of

Re: [blfs-dev] Gnome 3 Report

2012-03-11 Thread Armin K.
On 03/11/2012 06:34 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Armin K. wrote: >> Hello there. Here are some Gnome recommendations. >> >> First and one that has been disturbing me since first time I tried to >> build gnome with BLFS instructions (where I always failed, of course) is >> >> Let's remove $GNOME_SYSCONF

Re: [blfs-dev] Gnome 3 Report

2012-03-11 Thread Armin K.
On 03/11/2012 06:34 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Armin K. wrote: >> Hello there. Here are some Gnome recommendations. >> >> First and one that has been disturbing me since first time I tried to >> build gnome with BLFS instructions (where I always failed, of course) is >> >> Let's remove $GNOME_SYSCONF

[blfs-dev] Urls

2012-03-11 Thread Bruce Dubbs
TO all editors: The xml handles the structure: http://tar.gz";> Download (HTTP): Download (FTP): If the entity is a single blank, the list item is suppressed by the xml. There is no need to comment it out. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev

Re: [blfs-dev] Gnome 3 Report

2012-03-11 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Armin K. wrote: >>> /etc/bash_completion.d >> I really dislike this one. It's not a configuration file, it is a >> library file. The user/admin will never change these entries. Ant I >> don't like the implementation anyway because bash puts everything in the >> environment. In Fedora, the envir

Re: [blfs-dev] Gnome 3 Report

2012-03-11 Thread Armin K.
On 03/11/2012 08:03 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Armin K. wrote: > /etc/bash_completion.d >>> I really dislike this one. It's not a configuration file, it is a >>> library file. The user/admin will never change these entries. Ant I >>> don't like the implementation anyway because bash puts every

Re: [blfs-dev] Urls

2012-03-11 Thread Armin K.
On 03/11/2012 07:59 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > TO all editors: > > The xml handles the structure: > > http://tar.gz";> > > > > Download (HTTP): > > > Download (FTP): > > > If the entity is a single blank, the list item is suppressed by the xml. > There is no need to comment it out. >

Re: [blfs-dev] Gnome 3 Report

2012-03-11 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Armin K. wrote: > It is not about systemd, it is about ConsoleKit ... ConsoleKit has been > discontinued in favour of systemd-logind (new user seat manager), and it > is just question of time when we will have to add it in the book for > that sake. As for an init system, it is very fast, How

Re: [blfs-dev] Gnome 3 Report

2012-03-11 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Armin K. wrote: > I was talking about gnome stuff. It's standard for them to be in > /etc, not /etc/gnome or /var/lib. I can live with it in /etc, but IMO, consolidation of gnome specific config files in one subdirectory would be a "good thing". -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mail

Re: [blfs-dev] Gnome 3 Report

2012-03-11 Thread Ken Moffat
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 04:44:34PM +0100, Armin K. wrote: > Hello there. Here are some Gnome recommendations. > > First and one that has been disturbing me since first time I tried to > build gnome with BLFS instructions (where I always failed, of course) is > > Let's remove $GNOME_SYSCONFDIR ..

Re: [blfs-dev] Urls

2012-03-11 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Armin K. wrote: > On 03/11/2012 07:59 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> TO all editors: >> >> The xml handles the structure: >> >> http://tar.gz";> >> >> >> >> Download (HTTP): >> >> >> Download (FTP): >> >> >> If the entity is a single blank, the list item is suppressed by the xml. >> The

Re: [blfs-dev] Gnome 3 Report

2012-03-11 Thread Armin K.
On 03/11/2012 08:34 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Armin K. wrote: > >> It is not about systemd, it is about ConsoleKit ... ConsoleKit has been >> discontinued in favour of systemd-logind (new user seat manager), and it >> is just question of time when we will have to add it in the book for >> that sake.

Re: [blfs-dev] Gnome 3 Report

2012-03-11 Thread Armin K.
On 03/11/2012 08:41 PM, Ken Moffat wrote: > On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 04:44:34PM +0100, Armin K. wrote: >> Hello there. Here are some Gnome recommendations. >> >> First and one that has been disturbing me since first time I tried to >> build gnome with BLFS instructions (where I always failed, of cou

Re: [blfs-dev] Urls

2012-03-11 Thread Armin K.
On 03/11/2012 08:43 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Armin K. wrote: >> On 03/11/2012 07:59 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >>> TO all editors: >>> >>> The xml handles the structure: >>> >>> http://tar.gz";> >>> >>> >>> >>> Download (HTTP): >>> >>> >>> Download (FTP): >>> >>> >>> If the entity is

Re: [blfs-dev] Gnome 3 Report

2012-03-11 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Armin K. wrote: > On 03/11/2012 08:34 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Startup finished in 1s 655ms 874us (kernel) + 19s 811ms 430us > (userspace) = 21s 467ms 304us. > > On Pentium 4 2.8GHz and 1024MB of RAM with lots of services. > > acpid, avahi, cronie, rsyslog, udev, dbus, network-manager, ntp, cup

Re: [blfs-dev] Gnome 3 Report

2012-03-11 Thread Armin K.
On 03/11/2012 09:25 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Armin K. wrote: >> On 03/11/2012 08:34 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > >> Startup finished in 1s 655ms 874us (kernel) + 19s 811ms 430us >> (userspace) = 21s 467ms 304us. >> >> On Pentium 4 2.8GHz and 1024MB of RAM with lots of services. >> >> acpid, avahi, cron

Re: [blfs-dev] Urls

2012-03-11 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Armin K. wrote: >>> Sorry, it rendered an empty space on my machine, so I commented it out. >> Hmm. That shouldn't happen. >> The entity needs to be a single space, " ", not a null string "". >> >> See stylesheets/lfs-xsl/xhtml/lfs-mixed.xsl lines 22-49 >> >> -- Bruce > > See http://i39.tiny

Re: [blfs-dev] Gnome 3 Report

2012-03-11 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Armin K. wrote: > On 03/11/2012 09:25 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> Armin K. wrote: >>> On 03/11/2012 08:34 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >>> Startup finished in 1s 655ms 874us (kernel) + 19s 811ms 430us >>> (userspace) = 21s 467ms 304us. >>> >>> On Pentium 4 2.8GHz and 1024MB of RAM with lots of services. >>

Re: [blfs-dev] Gnome 3 Report

2012-03-11 Thread Armin K.
On 03/11/2012 10:08 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Armin K. wrote: >> On 03/11/2012 09:25 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >>> Armin K. wrote: On 03/11/2012 08:34 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: Startup finished in 1s 655ms 874us (kernel) + 19s 811ms 430us (userspace) = 21s 467ms 304us. On Pentium

Re: [blfs-dev] Urls

2012-03-11 Thread Armin K.
On 03/11/2012 09:48 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Armin K. wrote: > Sorry, it rendered an empty space on my machine, so I commented it out. >>> Hmm. That shouldn't happen. >>> The entity needs to be a single space, " ", not a null string "". >>> >>> See stylesheets/lfs-xsl/xhtml/lfs-mixed.xsl line

Re: [blfs-dev] Urls

2012-03-11 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Armin K. wrote: > On 03/11/2012 09:48 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> Armin K. wrote: >> > Sorry, it rendered an empty space on my machine, so I commented it out. Hmm. That shouldn't happen. The entity needs to be a single space, " ", not a null string "". See stylesheets/lfs-xsl

Re: [blfs-dev] Urls

2012-03-11 Thread Armin K.
On 03/11/2012 11:24 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Armin K. wrote: >> On 03/11/2012 09:48 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >>> Armin K. wrote: >>> >> Sorry, it rendered an empty space on my machine, so I commented it out. > Hmm. That shouldn't happen. > The entity needs to be a single space, " ", not

Re: [blfs-dev] Urls

2012-03-11 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Armin K. wrote: > I don't know how, but now everything is rendered properly. Good. Glad that's done. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

[blfs-dev] init.d/sshd oom_score_adj typo

2012-03-11 Thread rfc
blfs/init.d/sshd in lfs-bootscripts-20120305 says: echo "-16" >/proc/${pid}/oom_score_adj -16 looks like an oom_adj value. for oom_score_adj you may want to use -1000 instead. it appears though that sshd will do this itself and that it now understands both oom_score_adj (preferred if ava