I just spent some time updating ptlib and opal.
Both packages were a bit of a pain because they needed a sed and a patch
respectively.
Then I checked what used these packages. The only package that uses
ptlib is opal and the only package that uses opal is
archive/gnome-obsolete/ekiga.xml
:(
Should we archive lprng? AFAICT, most of the programs it provides, lrp,
lpq, lprm, lpstat, etc are provided by cups and cups seems to be much
more active.
-- Bruce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See th
On 10/29/2012 05:23 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> I just spent some time updating ptlib and opal.
>
> Both packages were a bit of a pain because they needed a sed and a patch
> respectively.
>
> Then I checked what used these packages. The only package that uses
> ptlib is opal and the only package tha
On 10/29/2012 06:17 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Should we archive lprng? AFAICT, most of the programs it provides, lrp,
> lpq, lprm, lpstat, etc are provided by cups and cups seems to be much
> more active.
>
> -- Bruce
>
Nothing against that
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs