On 04/01/13 18:28, Wayne Blaszczyk wrote:
> On 04/01/13 09:52, Tobias Gasser wrote:
>> Am 03.01.2013 23:23, schrieb Armin K.:
>>> On 01/03/2013 11:03 PM, Tobias Gasser wrote:
any hint what else i can try to build 1.0.1?
thanks for any help
tobias
>>>
>>> As you se
On 04/01/13 09:52, Tobias Gasser wrote:
> Am 03.01.2013 23:23, schrieb Armin K.:
>> On 01/03/2013 11:03 PM, Tobias Gasser wrote:
>>>
>>> any hint what else i can try to build 1.0.1?
>>>
>>>
>>> thanks for any help
>>> tobias
>>>
>>
>> As you see, libtirpc is not yet ready to take over RPC stuff. Th
On 01/03/2013 11:41 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Armin K. wrote:
>> As you see, libtirpc is not yet ready to take over RPC stuff. That's why
>> Glibc developers introduced --enable-obsolete-rpc switch if an user
>> wants to enable RPC API/ABI once again. It is not used in LFS, but few
>> of us asked fo
On 01/03/13 23:41, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> <...>
> I'd like to see a summary of problems and recommended solutions. -- Bruce
I'm still not able to compile open-vm-tools. (Just a problem, not a
recommended solution...)
Groet,
Thomas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: ht
Am 03.01.2013 23:23, schrieb Armin K.:
> On 01/03/2013 11:03 PM, Tobias Gasser wrote:
>>
>> any hint what else i can try to build 1.0.1?
>>
>>
>> thanks for any help
>> tobias
>>
>
> As you see, libtirpc is not yet ready to take over RPC stuff. That's why
> Glibc developers introduced --enable-obso
Armin K. wrote:
> On 01/03/2013 11:03 PM, Tobias Gasser wrote:
>>
>> any hint what else i can try to build 1.0.1?
> As you see, libtirpc is not yet ready to take over RPC stuff. That's why
> Glibc developers introduced --enable-obsolete-rpc switch if an user
> wants to enable RPC API/ABI once agai
On 01/03/2013 11:03 PM, Tobias Gasser wrote:
>
> any hint what else i can try to build 1.0.1?
>
>
> thanks for any help
> tobias
>
As you see, libtirpc is not yet ready to take over RPC stuff. That's why
Glibc developers introduced --enable-obsolete-rpc switch if an user
wants to enable RPC API/
Am 03.01.2013 22:09, schrieb Armin K.:
> Dana 3.1.2013 21:27, Tobias Gasser je napisao:
>>
>>> Recommended:
>>> lvm2
>> 3.2
>
> There is something wrong with this.
>
> Are you refering to llvm or lvm2 ? llvm is at version 3.2 while lvm2 is
> at version 2.02.98 or something like that.
sorry, i took
with libvirt 1.0.1
export CPPFLAGS="-I/usr/include/tirpc"
export CFLAGS="-I/usr/include/tirpc"
./configure --prefix=/usr --libexecdir=/usr/lib/libvirt --disable-static
make
...
CC libvirt_lxc-lxc_protocol.o
./lxc/lxc_protocol.c: In function 'xdr_virLXCProtocolInitEventMsg':
./lxc/lxc_pro
Dana 3.1.2013 21:27, Tobias Gasser je napisao:
>
>> Recommended:
>> lvm2
> 3.2
There is something wrong with this.
Are you refering to llvm or lvm2 ? llvm is at version 3.2 while lvm2 is
at version 2.02.98 or something like that.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: ht
sorry for the delay, i was busy upgrading from gtk2 to gtk3
now i am ready for libvirt, and i still have the same problem.
i listed the version for each package
>
> Required:
> curl
7.28.1
> libgcrypt
1.5.0
> libxml2
2.9.0
> libnl
3.2.16
> gnutls
3.1.5
> util-linux
2.22.2
> libxslt
1.1.28
> pyth
Hi guys,
www.linuxfromscratch.org has temporarily been redirected to
lfsbook.linuxfromscratch.org to help facilitate in the sever migration.
lfsbook is hosted on Anduin (by way of Bruce).
Gerard
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/
12 matches
Mail list logo