Hello !
Libjpeg-turbo-1.2.1 seems to require nasm (or yasm) to be built.
> checking for nasm... no
> checking for nasmw... no
> checking for yasm... no
> configure: error: no nasm (Network Assembler) found
With NASM-2.10.07, libjpeg-turbo compiles flawless and all tests succeed.
Best regards
On 2013-01-21 15:13, Gerard Beekmans wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I'd like to call a freeze to SVN and Trac for all LFS related activities
> (LFS, BLFS and everything else). I plan to finish its migration to the
> new server between late tonight and tomorrow morning depending when
> activity ceases (ie. w
Randy McMurchy wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Excuse my ignorance on this subject as the /run filesystem is new to
> me and I am curious how everyone is handling directories in /run that
> are expected to exist after a system reboot. Many packages create
> directories during their installation procedure in /
Hi all,
Excuse my ignorance on this subject as the /run filesystem is new to
me and I am curious how everyone is handling directories in /run that
are expected to exist after a system reboot. Many packages create
directories during their installation procedure in /run (or /var/run,
which is the sa
Hi guys,
I'd like to call a freeze to SVN and Trac for all LFS related activities
(LFS, BLFS and everything else). I plan to finish its migration to the
new server between late tonight and tomorrow morning depending when
activity ceases (ie. when you guys have had a chance to read this email).
On 01/21/2013 08:00 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Armin K. wrote:
>> I can write and maintain it, but it will also require instructions to
>> remove Udev extracted from systemd.
>>
>> Also, If we want to offer users to choose systemd as default, we will
>> also need to provide instructions to completely
Armin K. wrote:
> On 01/21/2013 07:06 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Wayne Blaszczyk wrote:
>>
>>> I've been using (pure (no bootscripts)) systemd for the past 4 months
>>> when I upgraded to LFS 7.2, and I'm quite happy with it. I don't see
>>> what all the negative fuss with it was all about.
>>
>> We
On 01/21/2013 07:06 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Wayne Blaszczyk wrote:
>
>> I've been using (pure (no bootscripts)) systemd for the past 4 months
>> when I upgraded to LFS 7.2, and I'm quite happy with it. I don't see
>> what all the negative fuss with it was all about.
>
> We try to explain what is g
Wayne Blaszczyk wrote:
> I've been using (pure (no bootscripts)) systemd for the past 4 months
> when I upgraded to LFS 7.2, and I'm quite happy with it. I don't see
> what all the negative fuss with it was all about.
We try to explain what is going on with the boot process. Systemd makes
it op
