On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 11:05:27PM +, Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 02:53:31PM -0600, Randy McMurchy wrote:
> >
> > I have version 287 installed and have the exact same error in my configure
> > logs.
> >
> Thanks. If I manage to fix it, I'll commit the change. At the
> momen
Armin K. wrote:
> I have 6GB of RAM and 6GB swap file so memory is not the problem. It's
> stack size that is the problem and we can't set ulimit as normal user
> iirc ... In LFS, ulimit is increased before make -k check.
Yes, but that's specific to each bash instance. I suppose one could do
so
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 11:15:14PM +0100, Pierre Labastie wrote:
>
> Amazingly, I have less unsupported tests than you in gcc (and many less
> XPASS or FAIL), but more unsupported tests in g++. I also have many
> more results for gfortran (see attached file).
> But, the results which can be compar
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 02:53:31PM -0600, Randy McMurchy wrote:
> Ken Moffat wrote these words on 02/10/13 13:04 CST:
> > configure:14508: checking for usable Xft/fontconfig package
> > configure:14534: gcc -o conftest -g -O2 -D_GNU_SOURCE
> > -DNARROWPROTO=1 -DFUNCPROTO=15 -DOSMAJORVERSION=3 -DOS
On 02/10/2013 11:34 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Pierre Labastie wrote:
>
>> I think the out of memory error are tcl errors, not gcc.
>>
>> Amazingly, I have less unsupported tests than you in gcc (and many less
>> XPASS or FAIL), but more unsupported tests in g++. I also have many
>> more results for
On 02/10/2013 11:15 PM, Pierre Labastie wrote:
> Le 10/02/2013 21:35, Armin K. a écrit :
>> On 02/10/2013 03:08 PM, Pierre Labastie wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Here is a patch to update the GCC page, since part of it is presently
>>> inaccurate.
>>> It also reintroduces ADA, and adds GO, for completenes
Pierre Labastie wrote:
> I think the out of memory error are tcl errors, not gcc.
>
> Amazingly, I have less unsupported tests than you in gcc (and many less
> XPASS or FAIL), but more unsupported tests in g++. I also have many
> more results for gfortran (see attached file).
> But, the results w
Le 10/02/2013 21:35, Armin K. a écrit :
On 02/10/2013 03:08 PM, Pierre Labastie wrote:
Hi,
Here is a patch to update the GCC page, since part of it is presently
inaccurate.
It also reintroduces ADA, and adds GO, for completeness.
I can make a more complete patch (Changelog entry) if necessary.
Randy McMurchy wrote:
> Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 02/10/13 15:12 CST:
>> Randy McMurchy wrote:
>>
>>> What about the Trac updates to the source code?
>>
>> I don't understand your question.
>
>>From the Trac "Active Tickets" (looking at the current bug list), click
> on the top toolbar where
Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 02/10/13 15:12 CST:
> Randy McMurchy wrote:
>
>> What about the Trac updates to the source code?
>
> I don't understand your question.
>From the Trac "Active Tickets" (looking at the current bug list), click
on the top toolbar where it says "Browse Source". Then
Randy McMurchy wrote:
> What about the Trac updates to the source code?
I don't understand your question.
-- Bruce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
I'm getting a 403 error when trying to access
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/downloads/svn/blfs-book-svn-html-2013-02-10.tar.bz2.
I was also getting this error when trying to access the "Read Online" pages, but
that seems to have been cleared up while I was typing this email.
Just thought y
Randy McMurchy wrote:
> Ken Moffat wrote these words on 02/10/13 13:04 CST:
>> configure:14508: checking for usable Xft/fontconfig package
>> configure:14534: gcc -o conftest -g -O2 -D_GNU_SOURCE
>> -DNARROWPROTO=1 -DFUNCPROTO=15 -DOSMAJORVERSION=3 -DOSMINORVERSION=8
>> -I/usr/include/freetype2 c
Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 02/10/13 15:02 CST:
> Randy McMurchy wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I cannot access BLFS SVN at http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/svn/.
>> Can anyone confirm this?
>>
>> Also, the source code history in Trac has not made updates for 3 weeks. Is
>> this because that
Randy McMurchy wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I cannot access BLFS SVN at http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/svn/.
> Can anyone confirm this?
>
> Also, the source code history in Trac has not made updates for 3 weeks. Is
> this because that area of Trac has not been merged? When it is fixed, will
> co
On Sunday 10 February 2013 14:51:29 Randy McMurchy wrote:
> I cannot access BLFS SVN at http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/svn/.
> Can anyone confirm this?
I can confirm this.
-Ragnar-
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.h
Ken Moffat wrote these words on 02/10/13 13:04 CST:
> configure:14508: checking for usable Xft/fontconfig package
> configure:14534: gcc -o conftest -g -O2 -D_GNU_SOURCE
> -DNARROWPROTO=1 -DFUNCPROTO=15 -DOSMAJORVERSION=3 -DOSMINORVERSION=8
> -I/usr/include/freetype2 conftest.c -lXft -lXmu -lX
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 09:25:21PM +0100, Aleksandar Kuktin wrote:
> >On Sun, 10 Feb 2013 19:04:29 +
> >Ken Moffat wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 05:17:58PM +, Ken Moffat wrote:
> > > Oh well,
> > > perhaps (some) legacy fonts need to stay in the book for xterm.
> > > [sigh/].
>
Hi all,
I cannot access BLFS SVN at http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/svn/.
Can anyone confirm this?
Also, the source code history in Trac has not made updates for 3 weeks. Is
this because that area of Trac has not been merged? When it is fixed, will
commits from the last 3 weeks show up?
On 02/10/2013 03:08 PM, Pierre Labastie wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here is a patch to update the GCC page, since part of it is presently
> inaccurate.
> It also reintroduces ADA, and adds GO, for completeness.
>
> I can make a more complete patch (Changelog entry) if necessary.
>
> Regards,
> Pierre
>
>
>
O
>On Sun, 10 Feb 2013 19:04:29 +
>Ken Moffat wrote:
>
> On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 05:17:58PM +, Ken Moffat wrote:
> > Oh well,
> > perhaps (some) legacy fonts need to stay in the book for xterm.
> > [sigh/].
> >
> Actually, it looks like a configure problem in xterm, prompted by a
> toolc
On 02/10/2013 08:17 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Pierre Labastie wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Here is a patch to update the GCC page, since part of it is presently
>> inaccurate.
>> It also reintroduces ADA, and adds GO, for completeness.
>>
>> I can make a more complete patch (Changelog entry) if necessary.
>
Pierre Labastie wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here is a patch to update the GCC page, since part of it is presently
> inaccurate.
> It also reintroduces ADA, and adds GO, for completeness.
>
> I can make a more complete patch (Changelog entry) if necessary.
Pierre, can you please create a ticket at
http://wik
Chris Staub wrote:
> In the BLFS patch download directory -
> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/blfs/svn/ - every patch is
> coming up "Access Denied". I would guess there must be some permissions
> issue there (stray chmod -r or something similar?).
Unless someone has changed it since your
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 05:17:58PM +, Ken Moffat wrote:
> Oh well,
> perhaps (some) legacy fonts need to stay in the book for xterm.
> [sigh/].
>
Actually, it looks like a configure problem in xterm, prompted by a
toolchain change in the last couple of years :
configure:14508: checking for
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 01:08:56PM +0100, Aleksandar Kuktin wrote:
> >On Sun, 10 Feb 2013 02:29:58 +
> >Ken Moffat wrote:
>
> > So, does xterm handle these glyphs in UTF-8 for anyone ? If so,
> > what do you have in /etc/X11/app-defaults/XTerm or ~/.Xresources ?
>
> I can confirm that XTer
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 01:09:55PM +0100, Pierre Labastie wrote:
>
> OTH, I just see that comment in the file:
> ! xterm can switch at runtime between bitmap (default) and TrueType fonts.
> ! The "faceSize" resource controls the size of the latter. However, it was
> ! originally given with a size
Hi,
Here is a patch to update the GCC page, since part of it is presently
inaccurate.
It also reintroduces ADA, and adds GO, for completeness.
I can make a more complete patch (Changelog entry) if necessary.
Regards,
Pierre
Index: blfsbook/general/prog/gcc.xml
===
Le 10/02/2013 12:58, Pierre Labastie a écrit :
> On Debian, the last four lines of /etc/X11/app-defaults/XTerm are
> commented out (including the faceName one), so those lines might not be
> the ones you want to modify.
>
>
Sorry, that is not accurate. I meant that the lines
*VT100*locale: true
*V
>On Sun, 10 Feb 2013 02:29:58 +
>Ken Moffat wrote:
> So, does xterm handle these glyphs in UTF-8 for anyone ? If so,
> what do you have in /etc/X11/app-defaults/XTerm or ~/.Xresources ?
I can confirm that XTerm renders the string correctly for me.
Since I have no idea how does one configu
Le 10/02/2013 03:29, Ken Moffat a écrit :
> In connection with reviewing the TrueType fonts I build, I was
> going to ask if there was a reason why the book still installs
> legacy xorg fonts. I've only used TTF/OTF fonts for several years,
> and the only issue I've noticed is that xcalc can't d
31 matches
Mail list logo