On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 12:57:08AM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
>
> Actually, seahorse is why I'm replying now (was goingto wait a
> bit). I've got a build order for totem (on top of my completed
> desktop), but seahorse doesn't get pulled in. So I took a look at
> the book. I _think_ seahorse can
On Sun, Sep 08, 2013 at 05:44:08PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Ken Moffat wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 08, 2013 at 12:34:22PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> >> Ken Moffat wrote:
> >>
> >>> Can I suggest that we consider a freeze for the 7.4 BLFS book (at
> >>> some point) even with tickets outstanding ?
> >
Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 08, 2013 at 12:34:22PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Ken Moffat wrote:
>>
>>> Can I suggest that we consider a freeze for the 7.4 BLFS book (at
>>> some point) even with tickets outstanding ?
>>
>> We can do that, but I'd want to minimize the freeze time due to the
>>
On Sun, Sep 08, 2013 at 12:34:22PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Ken Moffat wrote:
>
> > Can I suggest that we consider a freeze for the 7.4 BLFS book (at
> > some point) even with tickets outstanding ?
>
> We can do that, but I'd want to minimize the freeze time due to the
> upstream churn rate.
Hi,
Only to tell you that the French translation of the LFS 7.4 book was
released too. We've just announced and online it.
Best regards,
Le 08/09/2013 20:20, Bruce Dubbs a écrit :
> The Linux From Scratch community announces the release of LFS Stable
> Version 7.4. It is a major release with to
The Linux From Scratch community announces the release of LFS Stable
Version 7.4. It is a major release with toolchain updates to
binutils-2.23.2, glibc-2.18, and gcc-4.8.1. In total, 32 packages (of
62) were updated from LFS-7.3 and changes to bootscripts and text have
been made throughout the
Ken Moffat wrote:
> Can I suggest that we consider a freeze for the 7.4 BLFS book (at
> some point) even with tickets outstanding ?
We can do that, but I'd want to minimize the freeze time due to the
upstream churn rate.
> Many of the changes look benign, but a lot of them are things I
> don'
On Sun, Sep 08, 2013 at 10:24:59AM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
>
> > I will try to install transmission with Qt4. But for now, I am testing
> > firefox-23.0.1-system_cairo-1.patch, that Igor submitted, with
> > xulrunner/firefox. Next, I will be testing another patch fo
Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
> I will try to install transmission with Qt4. But for now, I am testing
> firefox-23.0.1-system_cairo-1.patch, that Igor submitted, with
> xulrunner/firefox. Next, I will be testing another patch for seamonkey
> and cairo, but it seemed a little different from the one
Em 08-09-2013 11:32, Bruce Dubbs escreveu:
> Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
>
>> That was meant to say that I agree with archiving qt5. and qtchooser.
>
> I gave this some thought and decided to enhance the text and leave it
> for now. What's there does work and users can ignore it if they don't
Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
> That was meant to say that I agree with archiving qt5. and qtchooser.
I gave this some thought and decided to enhance the text and leave it
for now. What's there does work and users can ignore it if they don't
want to install both.
I do want to provide a way to i
Em 07-09-2013 12:48, Fernando de Oliveira escreveu:
> Em 07-09-2013 12:42, Bruce Dubbs escreveu:
>> Igor Živković wrote:
>>> On 09/07/2013 05:22 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Igor,
I see you added a patch for building transmission with qt4. Are you
going to update transmission in the
12 matches
Mail list logo
