Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
> Dan Nicholson wrote:
>
>> [ 7:24 AM [EMAIL PROTECTED] svn ls
>> svn://svn.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/trunk/reiserfs
>> reiserfs-3.6.19-header_fix-1.patch
>>
>
> Thanks, I'll use the patch tomorrow.
>
>
Alex use 3.6.20 it's out.
http://cblfs.cross-lfs.org
Randy McMurchy wrote:
> Jim Gifford wrote these words on 01/11/07 16:48 CST:
>
>
>> Randy, we already do.
>>
>
> Jim, it is not worth haggling over. I simply mentioned this earlier
> as a matter of principle. Your attribution does not adhere to the
> BLFS
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Jim,
> Randy's the lead now, but I can see some of your point, but not all.
> BLFS is a community effort too. I personally don't mind you taking
> whatever you think is appropriate and putting it into CBLFS. In fact,
> that is allowed by the license.
>
>
No it's not. BLF
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
> Randy McMurchy wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Noted on the CBLFS page is a note that says not to copy from the BLFS
>> book as it may violate the copyright. But I can't help but notice that
>> many of the descriptions, etc are copied directly from BLFS.
>>
>
> A little o
Randy McMurchy wrote:
> Jim Gifford wrote these words on 01/11/07 16:04 CST:
>
>> Bruce,
>> We are all part of LFS, the only reason I put in that notice was to
>> let people know not to copy your material. Essentially we were told by
>> BLFS that you would
Bruce,
We are all part of LFS, the only reason I put in that notice was to
let people know not to copy your material. Essentially we were told by
BLFS that you would not support multilib and other architectures, we
took care of it with an open project. We have been going through and
been re
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
Hey All,
There's several parts of the website that need updating, and I was
hoping to get feedback from those of you in the know. Here's some of the
main things I need help with:
* The various Who's who sections for all projects
* Nearly all of the ALFS sub-project - I tr
Found the second on besides Dan's util-linux one. Vsftpd, caused by the
syscalls being removed from unistd.h, anyone got any ideas.
gcc -m64 -c sysdeputil.c -O2 -Wall -W -Wshadow -idirafter dummyinc
sysdeputil.c:162: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...' before
'capset'
sysdeputil.c:
The CLFS Development team is pleased to announce the final release of
CLFS-1.0.0, code-name "Bender". This release features Glibc 2.4, GCC
4.1.1, Binutils 2.17, and supports the x86, x86-64, sparc, powerpc,
ppc64, mips, mips64, and alpha, including multilib on those arch's
that support it. Cross
Ryan and I fully support this change, but we need to make ensure that
these changes do not affect our community at all, so if you have any
concerns, this is the time to get them out.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsub
Matthew Burgess wrote:
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
IMO, the requirements are:
1. Only publish commercially with permission.
This goes against the spirit of Free Software, IMO. I *do* understand
the reasons for wanting to do so, but GPL and BSD packages have survived
without such restrictions so far
Randy,
CLFS is on a stabilization cycle right now. The entire CLFS team is
going through the book with a fine tooth comb to get a release out very
soon. Except to see RC4 in the next few days, then in a week or so of no
changes the final release of 1.0.0.
I can't speak for the other pro
Archaic wrote:
On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 06:04:28PM -0500, Randy McMurchy wrote:
Perhaps, but it doesn't script as easily. ;)
The purpose of the book is educational on how to build, not about
scripting the build.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.lin
Randy,
What educational value does this new section add to the book, to me
it looks like it could be a support nightmare for BLFS.
--
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
LFS User # 2577
Registered Linux User # 299986
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
I've been working with the prototype BLFS Wiki that Jeremy set up.
I put an outline of the book on the wiki and have created a test version
of the book at on anduin at
http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/wiki
http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/wiki/BlfsNotes
I like i
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
As I also mentioned in a previous thread, I should be available to do
this tonight, but I completely understand that this is giving little
warning. If you need more time, perhaps you need to coordinate with
your devs, please let me know an alternative date and we'll fina
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
I don't think the scripted LiveCD approach is being considered for the
BLFS book, Jim. I think Alex was just responding to Alan's specific
request for a scripted build.
I just saw the page in DJ's directory, that's what through me off.
Here is the link http://www.linu
Looks like X has lost all the learning value there was from the old
version. This just looks like a way to automate the build, but doesn't
really go into detail like Gnome or KDE which are also modular systems.I
like the who, what, when, why, and where approach.
--
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EM
This should be a non issue if there are in the official patches archive.
--
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
LFS User # 2577
Registered Linux User # 299986
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the
Why not have both?
People who are familiar with FAM can use, and the peole who want to use
Gamin can use it. Let the users choose which route they want to go,
instead for forcing one or the other on them.
--
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
LFS User # 2577
Registered Linux User # 2
Guys,
Just something I found out, you can use pool.ntp.org, and it will
find the closes time server to you. Just a thought so you might add it
to the book.
--
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
LFS User # 2577
Registered Linux User # 299986
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/l
Tushar Teredesai wrote:
Now can someone please start a thread on LFS-dev to remove the
"Upgraded", "Added" and "Removed" sections from the LFS changelog so
that I can vote +1 on it.
The reason that is in LFS is because of the upgrades from the previous
version, we get a lot of questions on
Randy McMurchy wrote:
5. Added an Stunnel-less SWAT setup section (Jim's comments)
6. Added creating the nobody user and nogroup group to the bootscript
installation section.
Randy, Thank you. I was just pointing it out. The only reason I looked
at it was because of the thread. I knew you w
Randy McMurchy wrote:
Jim Gifford wrote these words on 06/04/05 01:20 CST:
BLFS has stunnel listed as optional, but the way you have things
configured, you made it dependent. If it was truly optional, you would
have a non-stunnel swat configuration also.
My previous reply was not
BLFS has stunnel listed as optional, but the way you have things
configured, you made it dependent. If it was truly optional, you would
have a non-stunnel swat configuration also.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubsc
Stig Hornuff wrote:
If it is of any help, then I'm going to try build LFS on 2 SUN boxes:
A SUN 420R & a SUN V250. Both of these are SPARC v9.
I'll let you know how things progresses if want it.
One thing which I can already say is: Default bootloader cannot be
used. I need to use Silo instead -
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Farid Bouzaghti wrote:
Hi,
On 32-bit systems with an Athlon64 cpu, GMP detects it as
x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. If CFLAGS/CXXFLAGS are set, GMP will try to
build 64 bit libraries. The book should recommend to unset these
variables before building GMP on AMD64, or to pass ABI=32 to
Randy McMurchy wrote:
John Gnew wrote these words on 03/26/05 19:51 CST:
[snip]
Your last couple of messages have come across as double-posts.
At least they're showing up twice in my inbox, anyway.
I have more configs in my original email on this Randy, you may want to
add them in.
http
I just think we should add the KERNEL_DIR in to prevent errors, that's
my point.
--
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
LFS User # 2577
Registered Linux User # 299986
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: Se
Randy McMurchy wrote:
Jim Gifford wrote these words on 03/08/05 20:52 CST:
Because the patch was uneccessary, since all you have to do was specify
KERNEL_DIR=/usr, which fixed the issue
Then how come you waited six months to tell me this?
Additionally, this is not the same answer you told
Randy McMurchy wrote:
Jim Gifford wrote these words on 03/08/05 19:56 CST:
The problem is with the older version, it specifically looks for the
/usr/src/linux-whatever, but the newer version have this line built into
the Makefile.
ifndef KERNEL_DIR
KERNEL_DIR=/usr/src/linux
endif
In Andrew
The problem is with the older version, it specifically looks for the
/usr/src/linux-whatever, but the newer version have this line built into
the Makefile.
ifndef KERNEL_DIR
KERNEL_DIR=/usr/src/linux
endif
In Andrew Benton's case since he didn't have a /usr/src/linux, it was
not a big deal, it
Randy McMurchy wrote:
Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 03/08/05 17:43 CST:
I ran into a situation with the current IPTables release,
I was planning to look at iptables in a couple of days (before BLFS
6.0 is released), so your post is very timely. Thanks.
Bruce, I would hazard a
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Jim Gifford wrote:
Bruce, Randy, and others,
I ran into a situation with the current IPTables release,
Jim,
I was planning to look at iptables in a couple of days (before BLFS
6.0 is released), so your post is very timely. Thanks.
-- Bruce
Bruce, I've been fig
Bruce, Randy, and others,
I ran into a situation with the current IPTables release, that I
think is worth mentioning on the list. It has to do with the fact that
the current IPTables depends on the kernel source includes and not the
santized ones we use for everything else. My problem is more
Randy McMurchy wrote:
Steffen R. Knollmann wrote these words on 02/24/05 19:48 CST:
Okay, I know you won't include it in BLFS 6.0, but since I have a
working teTeX-3.0 now, I thought I'd share my experiences. I attached
a file with my build commands, a list of files and md5sums and a list
of ge
Randy McMurchy wrote:
Jim Gifford wrote:
Based on the changes to the passwd and groups, I have updated the
udev-config file we use during our build.
[snip]
If BLFS would like me to, I could create the necessary text for their
book to add this in.
Jim,
This will definately be something
Based on the changes to the passwd and groups, I have updated the
udev-config file we use during our build.
This file can be downloaded from
http://downloads.linuxfromscratch.org/udev-config-2.rules.
This also raises a question about the BLFS stuff, and as a proactive
person, I created an addi
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Jim Gifford wrote:
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Jim Gifford wrote:
.so files belong in /usr/lib .so.version belong in /lib.
I'm not sure what you are saying here Jim. If the library file
is either referenced as a symlink or a regular file by an excutable
file in /bin or /sbi
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Jim Gifford wrote:
.so files belong in /usr/lib .so.version belong in /lib.
I'm not sure what you are saying here Jim. If the library file
is either referenced as a symlink or a regular file by an excutable
file in /bin or /sbin, it needs to be in /lib. There should
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Randy McMurchy wrote:
Hi all,
Linux-PAM installs the following libraries into the /lib directory:
libpam, libpamc and libpam_misc. Both static and dynamic libs are
installed.
The instructions move the .a libs to /usr/lib and create .so symlinks
to the /lib/libname.so.0.78 files i
41 matches
Mail list logo
