Bruce Dubbs wrote:
TheOldFellow wrote:
No, it's a lot of applications that together provide a windowing system.
It certainly isn't ONE application, since you can miss lots of it out
and still have functionality.
I disagree. It is a lot of *programs* and *libraries* that together
compose one
Archaic wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 07:15:15PM +0100, Andrew Benton wrote:
>> Is that wise? As it stands LFS is out of date. Old gcc, old glibc, old
>> kernel headers. As soon as trunk moves to a newer toolchain everyone
>> will start using that. Why waste effort releasing a book that's alre
Dan Nicholson wrote:
> On 4/4/06, Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Tue, 2006-04-04 at 16:58 -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote:
>>
>>> Assuming the patch works as advertised, how should the change be
>>> implemented? If the patch is deemed too large, we can always use the
>>> development sn
Leila Downing wrote:
> Diet Pill Breakthrough!!!
>
> What if you could actually shed 10, 15 or even 25 pounds
> quickly and safely in less then 30 days?
Actually, cutting your head off works quite as well in practice - you
can do it in under a second with a professionally built French
ex-governme
The instructions seem to be untested. Where I expect ${BASEDIR}, the
file says $(BASEDIR) and some of the / dividing elements of filenames
are missing. These work:
BASEDIR="/public_html/BLFS/"
xsltproc --xinclude --nonet -stringparam base.dir ${BASEDIR} \
stylesheets/blfs-chunked.xsl in
This says that it has a dependency on Mozilla. In fact either Firefox or
Thunderbird will do too (you might even be able to use Netscape). If
you do use those then you need to add something like:
--with-nspr-libs=/usr/lib/firefox-1.0.3
--with-nss-libs=/usr/lib/firefox-1.0.3
--with-nss-includes=/u
