On 10/29/2012 06:17 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Should we archive lprng? AFAICT, most of the programs it provides, lrp,
lpq, lprm, lpstat, etc are provided by cups and cups seems to be much
more active.
-- Bruce
Nothing against that
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
Should we archive lprng? AFAICT, most of the programs it provides, lrp,
lpq, lprm, lpstat, etc are provided by cups and cups seems to be much
more active.
-- Bruce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See