On 13.09.2012 10:18, Kenno Han wrote:
I agree with this argument.
Also, I am here to add more reason on that.
Not only that the download speed is low, it is also hard
for downloading process with scripts and text-based browser/downloader.
I think that we should even avoid using javascripted
On Thu, 13 Sep 2012, Kenno Han wrote:
I agree with this argument.
Also, I am here to add more reason on that.
Not only that the download speed is low, it is also hard
for downloading process with scripts and text-based browser/downloader.
I have no problems downloading from sourceforge with
Armin K. wrote:
On 13.09.2012 10:18, Kenno Han wrote:
I agree with this argument.
Also, I am here to add more reason on that.
Not only that the download speed is low, it is also hard
for downloading process with scripts and text-based browser/downloader.
I think that we should even avoid
Em 12-09-2012 18:29, Randy McMurchy escreveu:
I am glad to hearing from you again.
Was worried after your last message telling about the tornado, and every
day thought about enquiring if all went well.
--
[]s,
Fernando
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ:
I mentioned before that I dislike sourceforge. I just had another
instance as to why. I was updating the master files repository with
virtuoso-opensource-6.1.6.tar.gz. That's about 115 MB. The download
speed was generally less than 200 KB/sec. Sometimes as low as 15
KB/sec. In this case,
On 9/12/2012 11:30 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
I'd like to request that editors try to find alternative sites to
sourceforge. If that's the only site available, please offer anduin as
an alternate source.
The only problem with that is everyone (including editors) do not know
where the main hosting
On 12.09.2012 18:30, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
I mentioned before that I dislike sourceforge. I just had another
instance as to why. I was updating the master files repository with
virtuoso-opensource-6.1.6.tar.gz. That's about 115 MB. The download
speed was generally less than 200 KB/sec.
On Wed, 2012-09-12 at 16:29 -0500, Randy McMurchy wrote:
On 9/12/2012 11:30 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
I'd like to request that editors try to find alternative sites to
sourceforge. If that's the only site available, please offer anduin as
an alternate source.
The only problem with that is
Matt Burgess wrote:
On Wed, 2012-09-12 at 16:29 -0500, Randy McMurchy wrote:
On 9/12/2012 11:30 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
I'd like to request that editors try to find alternative sites to
sourceforge. If that's the only site available, please offer anduin as
an alternate source.
The only
