On 07/11/2013 04:20 AM, Armin K. wrote:
> On 07/09/2013 10:23 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Armin K. wrote:
>>
>>> I've noticed some mistakes
>>>
>>> First one, source package which ends its name with a number
>>>
>>> Think krb5, lcms2, bind9
>>>
>>> Adds the number to the version field, so it becomes
On 07/09/2013 10:23 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Armin K. wrote:
>
>> I've noticed some mistakes
>>
>> First one, source package which ends its name with a number
>>
>> Think krb5, lcms2, bind9
>>
>> Adds the number to the version field, so it becomes
>>
>> libcap2 2_2.22
>> krb5 5-1.11.3
>> lcms2 2-2
Armin K. wrote:
> I've noticed some mistakes
>
> First one, source package which ends its name with a number
>
> Think krb5, lcms2, bind9
>
> Adds the number to the version field, so it becomes
>
> libcap2 2_2.22
> krb5 5-1.11.3
> lcms2 2-2.5
> bind9 9-9.9.3
>
> Correct versions should be without
On 07/09/2013 03:09 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> I'm making reasonably good progress on my effort to compare the package
> versions in BLFS to the latest released versions.
>
> http://anduin.linuxfromscratch.org/~bdubbs/blfs-currency.html
>
> I'm up through Chapter 30. Only 17 to go! The only real
I'm making reasonably good progress on my effort to compare the package
versions in BLFS to the latest released versions.
http://anduin.linuxfromscratch.org/~bdubbs/blfs-currency.html
I'm up through Chapter 30. Only 17 to go! The only really long chapter
left is Multimedia Libraries and Drive
On 06/26/2013 12:22 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Thu Jun 20 21:29:28 GMT 2013 /usr/src/alsa/alsa-lib/alsa-lib-1.0.27.tar.bz2
> current
> Thu Jun 20 21:37:49 GMT 2013
> /usr/src/alsa/alsa-utils/alsa-utils-1.0.27.tar.bz2 current
1.0.27.1 exists for both.
> Thu Jun 20 22:28:38 GMT 2013 /usr/src/python
On 06/26/2013 11:33 PM, Armin K. wrote:
> On 06/25/2013 10:31 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> I've just finished a new build of a substantial (about 230 packages)
>> part of BLFS. After I finished and got a working system, I decided to
>> go back and check the sources' websites to see if the packages
On 06/25/2013 10:31 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> I've just finished a new build of a substantial (about 230 packages)
> part of BLFS. After I finished and got a working system, I decided to
> go back and check the sources' websites to see if the packages we have
> are current or not. In many cases
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
I've just finished a new build of a substantial (about 230 packages)
part of BLFS. After I finished and got a working system, I decided to
go back and check the sources' websites to see if the packages we have
are current or not. In many cases, we are current but there are qu
I've just finished a new build of a substantial (about 230 packages)
part of BLFS. After I finished and got a working system, I decided to
go back and check the sources' websites to see if the packages we have
are current or not. In many cases, we are current but there are quite a
few cases w
10 matches
Mail list logo