Re: [blfs-dev] Proposition for the GCC page

2013-02-11 Thread Pierre Labastie
Le 10/02/2013 23:34, Bruce Dubbs a écrit : > Pierre Labastie wrote: > >> I think the out of memory error are tcl errors, not gcc. >> >> Amazingly, I have less unsupported tests than you in gcc (and many less >> XPASS or FAIL), but more unsupported tests in g++. I also have many >> more results for

Re: [blfs-dev] Proposition for the GCC page

2013-02-10 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Armin K. wrote: > I have 6GB of RAM and 6GB swap file so memory is not the problem. It's > stack size that is the problem and we can't set ulimit as normal user > iirc ... In LFS, ulimit is increased before make -k check. Yes, but that's specific to each bash instance. I suppose one could do so

Re: [blfs-dev] Proposition for the GCC page

2013-02-10 Thread Ken Moffat
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 11:15:14PM +0100, Pierre Labastie wrote: > > Amazingly, I have less unsupported tests than you in gcc (and many less > XPASS or FAIL), but more unsupported tests in g++. I also have many > more results for gfortran (see attached file). > But, the results which can be compar

Re: [blfs-dev] Proposition for the GCC page

2013-02-10 Thread Armin K.
On 02/10/2013 11:34 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Pierre Labastie wrote: > >> I think the out of memory error are tcl errors, not gcc. >> >> Amazingly, I have less unsupported tests than you in gcc (and many less >> XPASS or FAIL), but more unsupported tests in g++. I also have many >> more results for

Re: [blfs-dev] Proposition for the GCC page

2013-02-10 Thread Armin K.
On 02/10/2013 11:15 PM, Pierre Labastie wrote: > Le 10/02/2013 21:35, Armin K. a écrit : >> On 02/10/2013 03:08 PM, Pierre Labastie wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Here is a patch to update the GCC page, since part of it is presently >>> inaccurate. >>> It also reintroduces ADA, and adds GO, for completenes

Re: [blfs-dev] Proposition for the GCC page

2013-02-10 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Pierre Labastie wrote: > I think the out of memory error are tcl errors, not gcc. > > Amazingly, I have less unsupported tests than you in gcc (and many less > XPASS or FAIL), but more unsupported tests in g++. I also have many > more results for gfortran (see attached file). > But, the results w

Re: [blfs-dev] Proposition for the GCC page

2013-02-10 Thread Pierre Labastie
Le 10/02/2013 21:35, Armin K. a écrit : On 02/10/2013 03:08 PM, Pierre Labastie wrote: Hi, Here is a patch to update the GCC page, since part of it is presently inaccurate. It also reintroduces ADA, and adds GO, for completeness. I can make a more complete patch (Changelog entry) if necessary.

Re: [blfs-dev] Proposition for the GCC page

2013-02-10 Thread Armin K.
On 02/10/2013 03:08 PM, Pierre Labastie wrote: > Hi, > > Here is a patch to update the GCC page, since part of it is presently > inaccurate. > It also reintroduces ADA, and adds GO, for completeness. > > I can make a more complete patch (Changelog entry) if necessary. > > Regards, > Pierre > > > O

Re: [blfs-dev] Proposition for the GCC page

2013-02-10 Thread Armin K.
On 02/10/2013 08:17 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Pierre Labastie wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Here is a patch to update the GCC page, since part of it is presently >> inaccurate. >> It also reintroduces ADA, and adds GO, for completeness. >> >> I can make a more complete patch (Changelog entry) if necessary. >

Re: [blfs-dev] Proposition for the GCC page

2013-02-10 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Pierre Labastie wrote: > Hi, > > Here is a patch to update the GCC page, since part of it is presently > inaccurate. > It also reintroduces ADA, and adds GO, for completeness. > > I can make a more complete patch (Changelog entry) if necessary. Pierre, can you please create a ticket at http://wik

[blfs-dev] Proposition for the GCC page

2013-02-10 Thread Pierre Labastie
Hi, Here is a patch to update the GCC page, since part of it is presently inaccurate. It also reintroduces ADA, and adds GO, for completeness. I can make a more complete patch (Changelog entry) if necessary. Regards, Pierre Index: blfsbook/general/prog/gcc.xml ===