Re: [blfs-dev] Proposition for the GCC page

2013-02-11 Thread Pierre Labastie
Le 10/02/2013 23:34, Bruce Dubbs a écrit : Pierre Labastie wrote: I think the out of memory error are tcl errors, not gcc. Amazingly, I have less unsupported tests than you in gcc (and many less XPASS or FAIL), but more unsupported tests in g++. I also have many more results for gfortran

[blfs-dev] Proposition for the GCC page

2013-02-10 Thread Pierre Labastie
Hi, Here is a patch to update the GCC page, since part of it is presently inaccurate. It also reintroduces ADA, and adds GO, for completeness. I can make a more complete patch (Changelog entry) if necessary. Regards, Pierre Index: blfsbook/general/prog/gcc.xml

Re: [blfs-dev] Proposition for the GCC page

2013-02-10 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Pierre Labastie wrote: Hi, Here is a patch to update the GCC page, since part of it is presently inaccurate. It also reintroduces ADA, and adds GO, for completeness. I can make a more complete patch (Changelog entry) if necessary. Pierre, can you please create a ticket at

Re: [blfs-dev] Proposition for the GCC page

2013-02-10 Thread Armin K.
On 02/10/2013 08:17 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: Pierre Labastie wrote: Hi, Here is a patch to update the GCC page, since part of it is presently inaccurate. It also reintroduces ADA, and adds GO, for completeness. I can make a more complete patch (Changelog entry) if necessary. Pierre, can

Re: [blfs-dev] Proposition for the GCC page

2013-02-10 Thread Armin K.
On 02/10/2013 03:08 PM, Pierre Labastie wrote: Hi, Here is a patch to update the GCC page, since part of it is presently inaccurate. It also reintroduces ADA, and adds GO, for completeness. I can make a more complete patch (Changelog entry) if necessary. Regards, Pierre Okay, I gave

Re: [blfs-dev] Proposition for the GCC page

2013-02-10 Thread Pierre Labastie
Le 10/02/2013 21:35, Armin K. a écrit : On 02/10/2013 03:08 PM, Pierre Labastie wrote: Hi, Here is a patch to update the GCC page, since part of it is presently inaccurate. It also reintroduces ADA, and adds GO, for completeness. I can make a more complete patch (Changelog entry) if

Re: [blfs-dev] Proposition for the GCC page

2013-02-10 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Pierre Labastie wrote: I think the out of memory error are tcl errors, not gcc. Amazingly, I have less unsupported tests than you in gcc (and many less XPASS or FAIL), but more unsupported tests in g++. I also have many more results for gfortran (see attached file). But, the results which

Re: [blfs-dev] Proposition for the GCC page

2013-02-10 Thread Armin K.
On 02/10/2013 11:15 PM, Pierre Labastie wrote: Le 10/02/2013 21:35, Armin K. a écrit : On 02/10/2013 03:08 PM, Pierre Labastie wrote: Hi, Here is a patch to update the GCC page, since part of it is presently inaccurate. It also reintroduces ADA, and adds GO, for completeness. I can make a

Re: [blfs-dev] Proposition for the GCC page

2013-02-10 Thread Ken Moffat
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 11:15:14PM +0100, Pierre Labastie wrote: Amazingly, I have less unsupported tests than you in gcc (and many less XPASS or FAIL), but more unsupported tests in g++. I also have many more results for gfortran (see attached file). But, the results which can be compared

Re: [blfs-dev] Proposition for the GCC page

2013-02-10 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Armin K. wrote: I have 6GB of RAM and 6GB swap file so memory is not the problem. It's stack size that is the problem and we can't set ulimit as normal user iirc ... In LFS, ulimit is increased before make -k check. Yes, but that's specific to each bash instance. I suppose one could do