Re: [blfs-dev] Report on building GNOME

2012-05-17 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
On 17-05-2012 17:51, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Andrew Benton wrote: > >> Surely most people have a router and don't need pppd so the default >> should be --disable-ppp with a command explanation that discusses it? >> IIRC Bruce was in favor of removing ppp from the book a couple of >> months ago :) > I

Re: [blfs-dev] Report on building GNOME

2012-05-17 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Andrew Benton wrote: > Surely most people have a router and don't need pppd so the default > should be --disable-ppp with a command explanation that discusses it? > IIRC Bruce was in favor of removing ppp from the book a couple of > months ago :) I think 'in favor' is slightly overstating it. I

Re: [blfs-dev] Report on building GNOME

2012-05-16 Thread Armin K.
On 05/16/2012 09:40 AM, Andrew Benton wrote: > On Wed, 16 May 2012 01:23:47 +0100 > "Armin K." wrote: > >> On 05/15/2012 11:35 PM, Pierre Labastie wrote: >>> Typos: >>> - libsoup page : in command explanations, first line : "specific >>> depepdencies" instead of "dependencies" >> >> Corrected. Bla

Re: [blfs-dev] Report on building GNOME

2012-05-16 Thread Andrew Benton
On Wed, 16 May 2012 01:23:47 +0100 "Armin K." wrote: > On 05/15/2012 11:35 PM, Pierre Labastie wrote: > > Typos: > > - libsoup page : in command explanations, first line : "specific > > depepdencies" instead of "dependencies" > > Corrected. Blame Andy for that one! :D You're blaming me for your

Re: [blfs-dev] Report on building GNOME

2012-05-15 Thread Armin K.
On 05/15/2012 11:35 PM, Pierre Labastie wrote: > - Telepathy-farstream requires gst-python, and I have not found a switch > to prevent configure from testing it and bombing out if not present. An update on this one. Gst-Python is only required for farstream python module iirc. Looking at configu

Re: [blfs-dev] Report on building GNOME

2012-05-15 Thread Armin K.
On 05/15/2012 11:35 PM, Pierre Labastie wrote: > Hi, > > I have built GNOME according to the book instruction of May 13. It went > rather smoothly (but lenghty). Here is my report. > Many of the observations are only typos, and often, they are about a non > GNOME package. > > Typos: > - libsoup pag

Re: [blfs-dev] Report on building GNOME

2012-05-15 Thread Ken Moffat
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 11:35:49PM +0200, Pierre Labastie wrote: > Hi, > > I have built GNOME according to the book instruction of May 13. It went > rather smoothly (but lenghty). Here is my report. Thanks for your testing. Minimal comments: > > Defects: > - Metacity: the run-time dependency

Re: [blfs-dev] Report on building GNOME

2012-05-15 Thread Andrew Benton
On Tue, 15 May 2012 22:38:28 +0100 Pierre Labastie wrote: > - NSS page : in recommended dependencies : "internal sqlite is > incompatable" instead of "incompatible" (well maybe incompatable is > English and I do no know it) Yes, you're right, it is a spelling mistake. It's a clumsy sentence is

[blfs-dev] Report on building GNOME

2012-05-15 Thread Pierre Labastie
Hi, I have built GNOME according to the book instruction of May 13. It went rather smoothly (but lenghty). Here is my report. Many of the observations are only typos, and often, they are about a non GNOME package. Typos: - libsoup page : in command explanations, first line : "specific depepden