Re: [blfs-dev] gtk+3

2012-06-04 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Andrew Benton wrote: > On Tue, 05 Jun 2012 00:20:21 +0100 > Bruce Dubbs wrote: > >> Looking at the instructions for gtk+3, we have the command explanation: >> >> --disable-packagekit: This parameter disables use of PackageKit which >> isn't suitable for BLFS. >> >> But we don't have it in the co

Re: [blfs-dev] gtk+3

2012-06-04 Thread Andrew Benton
On Tue, 05 Jun 2012 00:20:21 +0100 Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Looking at the instructions for gtk+3, we have the command explanation: > > --disable-packagekit: This parameter disables use of PackageKit which > isn't suitable for BLFS. > > But we don't have it in the configure line. This seems to be

[blfs-dev] gtk+3

2012-06-04 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Looking at the instructions for gtk+3, we have the command explanation: --disable-packagekit: This parameter disables use of PackageKit which isn't suitable for BLFS. But we don't have it in the configure line. This seems to be a contradiction. Should it be placed in the ./configure command?

Re: [blfs-dev] gtk+3 LastChangedBy: nobody

2012-01-23 Thread Ken Moffat
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 01:47:35PM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > > To set: use > svn propset svn:keywords "LastChangedBy Date" > To anyone playing along at home, the svn:keywords here is *key* - svn is stupid enough to set 'Date' (perhaps wrongly!) without it, but not LastChangedBy. I've used

Re: [blfs-dev] gtk+3 LastChangedBy: nobody

2012-01-23 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Ken Moffat wrote: > Still creating individual diffs for the packages in Wayne's book. > At gtk+3 I noticed that the book is newer, so obviously I won't use > that diff, but both pages show > > Last updated on 2007-04-04 20:42:53 +0100 > > I'm guessing the page was copied from a different page a

[blfs-dev] gtk+3 LastChangedBy: nobody

2012-01-23 Thread Ken Moffat
Still creating individual diffs for the packages in Wayne's book. At gtk+3 I noticed that the book is newer, so obviously I won't use that diff, but both pages show Last updated on 2007-04-04 20:42:53 +0100 I'm guessing the page was copied from a different page and the svn properties weren't ad