Re: [blfs-dev] libreoffice-4.1.1

2013-08-31 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
Em 31-08-2013 19:36, Ken Moffat escreveu: > On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 11:52:03PM +0200, Igor Živković wrote: >> >> I don't think you need to test LibreOffice with all the recommended >> packages to update the book. There is simply not enough book editors for >> that kind of work. We can easily remo

Re: [blfs-dev] libreoffice-4.1.1

2013-08-31 Thread Ken Moffat
On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 11:52:03PM +0200, Igor Živković wrote: > > I don't think you need to test LibreOffice with all the recommended > packages to update the book. There is simply not enough book editors for > that kind of work. We can easily remove the dependency, add a note or > patch at la

Re: [blfs-dev] libreoffice-4.1.1

2013-08-31 Thread Igor Živković
On 08/31/2013 09:57 PM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: > > Let me try again: > > -Change a little the Note > -Move Recommended B, O to U (except OpenSSL) to Optional > -Move corresponding switches to Command Explanations, after > "with-system-*, creating a block of "if you have installed or wish to >

Re: [blfs-dev] libreoffice-4.1.1

2013-08-31 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
Poppler and Boost are recurrent on this -- []s, Fernando -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: [blfs-dev] libreoffice-4.1.1

2013-08-31 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
Em 31-08-2013 10:24, Igor Živković escreveu: > On 08/31/2013 02:17 PM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: >> Em 31-08-2013 08:50, Igor Živković escreveu: >>> On 08/30/2013 11:47 PM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: I never use the dependencies: Redland-1.0.16 (which requires Rasqal-0.9.30 > Rapt

Re: [blfs-dev] libreoffice-4.1.1

2013-08-31 Thread Igor Živković
On 08/31/2013 03:24 PM, Igor Živković wrote: > > Actually you can't, my bad. You can only explicitly set it to use > system-installed packages which is default anyways. Err, default is to *not* use system-installed packages. -- Igor Živković http://www.slashtime.net/ -- http://linuxfromscratch.

Re: [blfs-dev] libreoffice-4.1.1

2013-08-31 Thread Igor Živković
On 08/31/2013 02:17 PM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: > Em 31-08-2013 08:50, Igor Živković escreveu: >> On 08/30/2013 11:47 PM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: >>> >>> I never use the dependencies: Redland-1.0.16 (which requires >>> Rasqal-0.9.30 > Raptor-2.0.10, all started by R's), OpenLDAP-2.4.36, >>>

Re: [blfs-dev] libreoffice-4.1.1

2013-08-31 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
Em 31-08-2013 08:50, Igor Živković escreveu: > On 08/30/2013 11:47 PM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: >> >> I never use the dependencies: Redland-1.0.16 (which requires >> Rasqal-0.9.30 > Raptor-2.0.10, all started by R's), OpenLDAP-2.4.36, >> Berkeley DB-6.0.20 and unixODBC-2.3.1. Is it OK to move th

Re: [blfs-dev] libreoffice-4.1.1

2013-08-31 Thread Igor Živković
On 08/30/2013 11:47 PM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: > > I never use the dependencies: Redland-1.0.16 (which requires > Rasqal-0.9.30 > Raptor-2.0.10, all started by R's), OpenLDAP-2.4.36, > Berkeley DB-6.0.20 and unixODBC-2.3.1. Is it OK to move them to Optional? If we are not going to explicitly

Re: [blfs-dev] libreoffice-4.1.1

2013-08-31 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
Em 30-08-2013 23:51, Fernando de Oliveira escreveu: > Em 30-08-2013 22:20, Ken Moffat escreveu: >> On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 10:07:07PM -0300, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: > >> There is now so much change in BLS that I don't always keep up to >> date. When I was first building LO-4.0 it failed for

Re: [blfs-dev] libreoffice-4.1.1

2013-08-30 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
Em 30-08-2013 22:20, Ken Moffat escreveu: > On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 10:07:07PM -0300, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: > There is now so much change in BLS that I don't always keep up to > date. When I was first building LO-4.0 it failed for me because I > hadn't noticed that Python 3 was recommended

Re: [blfs-dev] libreoffice-4.1.1

2013-08-30 Thread Ken Moffat
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 10:07:07PM -0300, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: > > > > How do you tell it to use Python 2 ? I've been installing 3 solely > > for LO-4. > > I do not tell. :-) Only today, before or after we exchanged posts, I > noticed that only Python 3 was there as Recommended. Could no

Re: [blfs-dev] libreoffice-4.1.1

2013-08-30 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
Em 30-08-2013 22:07, Fernando de Oliveira escreveu: > > First, to be clear, when I was telling that it is just a change of > prefix, I was referring to all previous, including the one on the book. And this, hopefully, should not change for the one that I will try to update the book, tomorrow. -

Re: [blfs-dev] libreoffice-4.1.1

2013-08-30 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
Em 30-08-2013 19:15, Ken Moffat escreveu: > On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 06:47:55PM -0300, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: >> Installing in /opt/libreoffice-4.1.1.2 is as easy as changing replacing >> the prefix. I have always used in /opt/.., not in /usr. Is it OK to >> change the page so that the user is

Re: [blfs-dev] libreoffice-4.1.1

2013-08-30 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
Em 30-08-2013 19:12, Bruce Dubbs escreveu: > Fernando de Oliveira wrote: >> Installing in /opt/libreoffice-4.1.1.2 is as easy as changing replacing >> the prefix. I have always used in /opt/.., not in /usr. Is it OK to >> change the page so that the user is left with the choice between the two? >

Re: [blfs-dev] libreoffice-4.1.1

2013-08-30 Thread Ken Moffat
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 06:47:55PM -0300, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: > Installing in /opt/libreoffice-4.1.1.2 is as easy as changing replacing > the prefix. I have always used in /opt/.., not in /usr. Is it OK to > change the page so that the user is left with the choice between the two? > > I ne

Re: [blfs-dev] libreoffice-4.1.1

2013-08-30 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Fernando de Oliveira wrote: > Installing in /opt/libreoffice-4.1.1.2 is as easy as changing replacing > the prefix. I have always used in /opt/.., not in /usr. Is it OK to > change the page so that the user is left with the choice between the two? Yes. > I never use the dependencies: Redland-1.0

[blfs-dev] libreoffice-4.1.1

2013-08-30 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
Installing in /opt/libreoffice-4.1.1.2 is as easy as changing replacing the prefix. I have always used in /opt/.., not in /usr. Is it OK to change the page so that the user is left with the choice between the two? I never use the dependencies: Redland-1.0.16 (which requires Rasqal-0.9.30 > Raptor-