Re: [blfs-dev] transcode

2013-01-01 Thread Ken Moffat
On Tue, Jan 01, 2013 at 06:22:21PM +0100, Armin K. wrote: > > Happy new year to you, too. Looking at your patch it looks like > trasncode calls "-vpre medium" but some claim that the correct switch > might be "-preset medium". That might be only true for x264 encoded > files though. > > See "N

Re: [blfs-dev] transcode

2013-01-01 Thread Baho Utot
On 01/01/2013 12:02 PM, Ken Moffat wrote: On Tue, Jan 01, 2013 at 11:14:36AM -0500, Baho Utot wrote: On 01/01/2013 08:48 AM, Baho Utot wrote: I have compiled and run k3b, ffmpeg and transcode here is the result: [export_ffmpeg.so] Parsing ffmpeg preset 'medium' File for preset 'medium' not fou

Re: [blfs-dev] transcode

2013-01-01 Thread Armin K.
On 01/01/2013 01:54 AM, Ken Moffat wrote: > On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 10:51:11PM +0100, Armin K. wrote: >> >> I have added a patch that replaces calls to avcodec_thread_init with >> correct functions. >> >> You can get it from LFS Patches Repository at >> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/downl

Re: [blfs-dev] transcode

2013-01-01 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Ken Moffat wrote: > I think the real question is whether people using k3b, such as > Baho, and anyone using dvd::rip, can get those to successfully use > transcode. For people using transcode on the command line, I suspect > that transcode commands which use ffmpeg will still be problematic. I

Re: [blfs-dev] transcode

2013-01-01 Thread Ken Moffat
On Tue, Jan 01, 2013 at 11:14:36AM -0500, Baho Utot wrote: > On 01/01/2013 08:48 AM, Baho Utot wrote: > > I have compiled and run k3b, ffmpeg and transcode here is the result: > > [export_ffmpeg.so] Parsing ffmpeg preset 'medium' > File for preset 'medium' not found > *** glibc detected *** /usr

Re: [blfs-dev] transcode

2013-01-01 Thread Ken Moffat
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 10:51:11PM +0100, Armin K. wrote: > > I have added a patch that replaces calls to avcodec_thread_init with > correct functions. > > You can get it from LFS Patches Repository at > http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/downloads/transcode/transcode-1.1.7-ffmpeg-2.patch

Re: [blfs-dev] transcode

2013-01-01 Thread Baho Utot
On 01/01/2013 08:48 AM, Baho Utot wrote: On 12/31/2012 04:51 PM, Armin K. wrote: On 12/31/2012 10:18 PM, Baho Utot wrote: At transcode forge they are to release version 1.2.0 sometime in January So I don't think it is abandoned. I just have a few issues with transcode: /usr/bin/transcode: sym

Re: [blfs-dev] transcode

2013-01-01 Thread Baho Utot
On 12/31/2012 04:51 PM, Armin K. wrote: > On 12/31/2012 10:18 PM, Baho Utot wrote: >> At transcode forge they are to release version 1.2.0 sometime in January >> So I don't think it is abandoned. >> >> I just have a few issues with transcode: >> >> /usr/bin/transcode: symbol lookup error: >> /usr/l

Re: [blfs-dev] transcode

2012-12-31 Thread Armin K.
On 12/31/2012 10:18 PM, Baho Utot wrote: > > At transcode forge they are to release version 1.2.0 sometime in January > So I don't think it is abandoned. > > I just have a few issues with transcode: > > /usr/bin/transcode: symbol lookup error: > /usr/lib/transcode/export_ffmpeg.so: undefined symbol

Re: [blfs-dev] transcode

2012-12-31 Thread Baho Utot
On 12/31/2012 01:41 PM, Ken Moffat wrote: > On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 01:12:50PM -0500, Baho Utot wrote: >> On 12/30/2012 01:24 PM, Ken Moffat wrote: >>>Earlier this year, I said I would take a look at transcode (we >>> removed it because it doesn't build with current ffmpeg) and perhaps >>> writ

Re: [blfs-dev] transcode

2012-12-31 Thread Ken Moffat
On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 06:24:57PM +, Ken Moffat wrote: > > It looks as if I'll need to keep installing it to get 'tccat' for > ripping my DVDs, but beyond that I think it is more trouble than it's > worth. > In fact, since I only want tccat I can limit my build : this works with ffmpeg-1.0

Re: [blfs-dev] transcode

2012-12-31 Thread Ken Moffat
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 01:12:50PM -0500, Baho Utot wrote: > On 12/30/2012 01:24 PM, Ken Moffat wrote: > > Earlier this year, I said I would take a look at transcode (we > > removed it because it doesn't build with current ffmpeg) and perhaps > > write a hint. Unfortunately, the more I look at i

Re: [blfs-dev] transcode

2012-12-31 Thread Baho Utot
On 12/30/2012 01:24 PM, Ken Moffat wrote: > Earlier this year, I said I would take a look at transcode (we > removed it because it doesn't build with current ffmpeg) and perhaps > write a hint. Unfortunately, the more I look at it, the less I like > it! > [putolin] I have been trying also to g

[blfs-dev] transcode

2012-12-30 Thread Ken Moffat
Earlier this year, I said I would take a look at transcode (we removed it because it doesn't build with current ffmpeg) and perhaps write a hint. Unfortunately, the more I look at it, the less I like it! I have no idea how to get it to build against current ffmpeg, and it looks as if nobody els

Re: [blfs-dev] transcode

2012-06-21 Thread Ken Moffat
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 09:08:25PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote: > > I've now tested totem with all the video file formats I have > available (it won't offer to play a DVD, probably a missing > dependency) and this all seems to work. Not suitable for the book, > but maybe I'll now gt back to DVD->CD

Re: [blfs-dev] transcode

2012-06-21 Thread Ken Moffat
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 04:36:43PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote: > On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 12:10:24PM +0100, Andrew Benton wrote: > > Somehow, I doubt transcode will reappear in the book : development > was at berlios, and stopped some time ago, the site we were using is > just a copy of what is/was a

Re: [blfs-dev] transcode

2012-06-17 Thread Ken Moffat
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 12:10:24PM +0100, Andrew Benton wrote: > > In this case I would argue that FFmpeg is more important than Transcode > (I don't install Transcode) and so if Transcode needs to be commented > out of the book for a few days while we find a fix then it's not the > end of the wor

Re: [blfs-dev] transcode

2012-06-17 Thread Armin K.
On 06/17/2012 01:10 PM, Andrew Benton wrote: > On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 11:01:53 +0100 > "Armin K." wrote: > >> I don't know why BLFS rushes to upgrade when it comes to ffmpeg, even >> tough it has been known that it can break something badly. > > We have a general policy to always update packages to t

Re: [blfs-dev] transcode

2012-06-17 Thread Andrew Benton
On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 11:01:53 +0100 "Armin K." wrote: > I don't know why BLFS rushes to upgrade when it comes to ffmpeg, even > tough it has been known that it can break something badly. We have a general policy to always update packages to the latest stable version. It's not possible to check e

Re: [blfs-dev] transcode

2012-06-17 Thread Armin K.
On 06/17/2012 01:25 AM, Ken Moffat wrote: > Anybody managed to build transcode with current ffmpeg ? > > ĸen > Nah, currently seems impossible. And I can't find any patch anywhere. I don't know why BLFS rushes to upgrade when it comes to ffmpeg, even tough it has been known that it can break s

[blfs-dev] transcode

2012-06-16 Thread Ken Moffat
Anybody managed to build transcode with current ffmpeg ? ĸen -- das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page