backport the patch to Dash 0.5.5.1.
Good idea?
No, as discussed before, it is a patched coreutils issue. There was a
bug in one of my versions of the coreutils i18n patches which caused
this. What version of coreutils are you using, and what version of the
patch?
Matt.
--
http
On Tue, 1 Dec 2009 06:33:52 -0600, William Immendorf will.immend...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 1:56 AM, Matthew Burgess
matt...@linuxfromscratch.org wrote:
No, as discussed before, it is a patched coreutils issue. There was a
bug in one of my versions of the coreutils i18n
..but Herbert Xu lost his mind about it, thinking it was a sed issue,
not a patched Coreutils/sort issue. I'm trying to get it fixed by
changing all of the LC_COLLATE to LC_CTYPE, but I havn't seen it
comitted yet. I'm waiting for Herbert to comitt this, then I'll
backport the patch to Dash
Rember the thread I started on blfs-support about dash failing to
compile? Well, Matthew has a fix, and I made it into a patch. I'll
like to submit it. Please take a look at it. (Note: Patch is still in
git format, but it still applies with -Np1.
--
William Immendorf
The ultimate in free
On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 11:06:03PM +, William Immendorf wrote:
Rember the thread I started on blfs-support about dash failing to
compile? Well, Matthew has a fix
Yes, he did. The problem was with sort because of a patch that LFS
applies, and therefore the problem was passed over to LFS
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 11:09 PM, Guy Dalziel
krendosha...@dementedfury.org wrote:
Yes, he did. The problem was with sort because of a patch that LFS
applies, and therefore the problem was passed over to LFS.
I know. Anyway, would you dash off a quick commit putting the patch in
the patch repo
On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 11:15:25PM +, William Immendorf wrote:
I know. Anyway, would you dash off a quick commit putting the patch in
the patch repo and mentioning it in the dash page and saying that it
works with LFS 6.5.
A patch isn't necessary for such a simple fix. If you rewrite
.
I know. Anyway, would you dash off a quick commit putting the patch in
the patch repo and mentioning it in the dash page and saying that it
works with LFS 6.5.
It's really not worth a patch for that, the corresponding sed is trivial
enough. I
guess we need to add this to LFS-6.5's errata
On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 11:23:37PM +, William Immendorf wrote:
Does this work for you?
sed -i 's/sort/LC_COLLATE=C /' src/mkbuiltins
Almost, your syntax catches the other sort which already has
LC_COLLATE=C prepended to it. To make sure we catch the one we want then
we need to be a little
Hello,
I'm just bringing this to the proper list:
Beginning of thread:
http://linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/alfs-discuss/2009-May/009729.html
Proposed adjustment:
http://linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/alfs-discuss/2009-May/009733.html
I'd like to propose that we follow Matt's suggestion as
, with the 'SHELL' variable. Also,
every package would need to be built with the variable introduction, and that
may be a bit unfair considering the lack of man power.
I'm still looking at this, but maybe discussion regarding /bin/sh /bin/dash
may be better placed in a hint or on the wiki
Trent Shea wrote:
Hello,
I'm just bringing this to the proper list:
Beginning of thread:
http://linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/alfs-discuss/2009-May/009729.html
Proposed adjustment:
http://linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/alfs-discuss/2009-May/009733.html
I'd like to propose that
. If there are no objections
I'll create a ticket and submit a patch in a day or two.
OK, I fixed the book.
Author: bdubbs
Date: 2009-05-20 09:55:19 -0600 (Wed, 20 May 2009)
New Revision: 7825
-screen role=rootuserinputln -svf dash /bin/sh/userinput/screen
+noteparaIf you create
I'd like to list the real upstream location for the dash http:// download:
http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/dash/files/dash-0.5.3.tar.gz
However, it'd also be nice to have the reliable Debian server as the
ftp:// alternate:
ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/d/dash/dash_0.5.3.orig.tar.gz
Dan Nicholson wrote these words on 03/23/07 17:30 CST:
I'd like to list the real upstream location for the dash http:// download:
http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/dash/files/dash-0.5.3.tar.gz
Yes, that would be better.
However, it'd also be nice to have the reliable Debian server
. There are 8 important patches under dash-0.5.3/debian/diff
that
get applied during the build.
Thanks Alexander,
New patch attached, please comment if you see something wrong with it.
It is completely wrong. Not the Debian patch should be applied, but the
patches from debian/diff
originally used.
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~dnicholson/patches/dash-0.5.3-upstream.patch
This patch also adds an optional dependency on libedit.
Sorry I missed that one. I think, this is worths considering, putting
in the book.
If I am not mistaken Bruce Dubbs, when he raised his objection
Ag. Hatzimanikas wrote:
It make sense the compliant POSIX shell (Dash) to be the default sh
shell.
Are you saying that bash is not POSIX complaint? It's a superset, but I
think its complaint, especially when called as sh.
-- Bruce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
On Sun, Mar 18, at 01:01 Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Ag. Hatzimanikas wrote:
It make sense the compliant POSIX shell (Dash) to be the default sh
shell.
Are you saying that bash is not POSIX complaint?
No of course not.
I just noticed in the Ash page, that we have this link.
So we can do the same
Ag. Hatzimanikas wrote:
I didn't applied the debian patch since from what I've saw it's debian
specific stuff (correct me if I am wrong).
Correcting. There are 8 important patches under dash-0.5.3/debian/diff that
get applied during the build.
--
Alexander E. Patrakov
--
http
On Fri, Mar 16, at 01:48 Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
Ag. Hatzimanikas wrote:
I didn't applied the debian patch since from what I've saw it's debian
specific stuff (correct me if I am wrong).
Correcting. There are 8 important patches under dash-0.5.3/debian/diff that
get applied during
Ag. Hatzimanikas wrote:
On Fri, Mar 16, at 01:48 Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
Ag. Hatzimanikas wrote:
I didn't applied the debian patch since from what I've saw it's debian
specific stuff (correct me if I am wrong).
Correcting. There are 8 important patches under dash-0.5.3/debian/diff
. There are 8 important patches under dash-0.5.3/debian/diff
that
get applied during the build.
Thanks Alexander,
New patch attached, please comment if you see something wrong with it.
It is completely wrong. Not the Debian patch should be applied, but the
patches from debian/diff
On 3/16/07, Alexander E. Patrakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ag. Hatzimanikas wrote:
I didn't applied the debian patch since from what I've saw it's debian
specific stuff (correct me if I am wrong).
Correcting. There are 8 important patches under dash-0.5.3/debian/diff that
get applied
On 3/16/07, Ag. Hatzimanikas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2.
Either create are own diff.
Looks like the threading got broken, but I'd already done this for my own use.
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~dnicholson/patches/dash-0.5.3-upstream.patch
It just needs some LFS boilerplate at the top
intention is to be POSIX compliant like dash or posh. They're much
smaller (nearly 5x, not stripped). Plus, you could help me identify
rogue bashisms in POSIX scripts :)
I saw your message last night, but it was a little bit late for me so I
promised to myself to be the first thing to do today
those things.
It's early here and this tea is not cutting it. Time to switch up to coffee.
For the rest.
We are talking about dash, which is a standard POSIX shell, quite
useful for debugging and very light/small shell that can be used in
small systems.
From what I've read Dash (Debian's Ash
On 3/15/07, Ag. Hatzimanikas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For the rest.
We are talking about dash, which is a standard POSIX shell, quite
useful for debugging and very light/small shell that can be used in
small systems.
From what I've read Dash (Debian's Ash) is maintained by Herbert Xu from
to it.
Agree.
Dan or anyone else, feel free to make your adjustments to the patch,
I will be grateful to correct any mistakes.
+1. Patch looks good to me. I'm curious to hear about the dropping Ash
part of the equation from others, but I think Dash could be added
regardless.
Will you
Dan Nicholson wrote:
+1. Patch looks good to me. I'm curious to hear about the dropping Ash
part of the equation from others, but I think Dash could be added
regardless.
I don't have any objections to dropping ash for dash, but I think that
should be Randy's call.
Personally, I don't use
Ag. Hatzimanikas wrote these words on 03/15/07 06:39 CST:
Index: postlfs/shells/shells.xml
===
I'll apply this patch, Ag. Thanks. In reference to Bruce's message,
I cannot see the need for ash any longer. We'll wait for the
On 3/15/07, Bruce Dubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dan Nicholson wrote:
+1. Patch looks good to me. I'm curious to hear about the dropping Ash
part of the equation from others, but I think Dash could be added
regardless.
I don't have any objections to dropping ash for dash, but I think
Randy McMurchy wrote these words on 03/15/07 12:09 CST:
Ag. Hatzimanikas wrote these words on 03/15/07 06:39 CST:
Index: postlfs/shells/shells.xml
===
I'll apply this patch, Ag. Thanks.
Done. Noted that there was no mention
On Thu, Mar 15, at 01:38 Randy McMurchy wrote:
Randy McMurchy wrote these words on 03/15/07 12:09 CST:
I'll apply this patch, Ag. Thanks.
Done.
Thanks Randy, I really appreciate it.
Noted that there was no mention about a test suite, so I added
a commented line as a reminder to do it. I
Ag. Hatzimanikas wrote:
Oh and... about your question in your previous email:
I will wait until next morning to see if there are any objections
and then I will decide. In any case, I would like to be treated like a
student.
I think graduate student would be appropriate.
-- Bruce
--
On Thu, Mar 15, at 02:39 Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Ag. Hatzimanikas wrote:
Oh and... about your question in your previous email:
I will wait until next morning to see if there are any objections
and then I will decide. In any case, I would like to be treated like a
student.
I think
El Jueves, 15 de Marzo de 2007 20:52, Ag. Hatzimanikas escribió:
Okey my last offer...
I've finished 2 years of college, but I still have 2 more to do.
Then you have two more college years than I ;-)
--
Manuel Canales Esparcia
Usuario de LFS nº2886: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org
LFS
On 3/15/07, Ag. Hatzimanikas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Mar 15, at 01:38 Randy McMurchy wrote:
Noted that there was no mention about a test suite, so I added
a commented line as a reminder to do it. I didn't download the file
nor test the instructions, so I cannot determine if there
On Thu, Mar 15, at 10:20 Dan Nicholson wrote:
On 3/15/07, Bruce Dubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dan Nicholson wrote:
+1. Patch looks good to me. I'm curious to hear about the dropping Ash
part of the equation from others, but I think Dash could be added
regardless.
I don't have
On Thu, Mar 15, at 10:15 Ag. Hatzimanikas wrote:
I will attach one ~/.zshrc and ~/.zprofile.
I need to add the attach word in the grep pattern, to cover some
more possibilities. :)
Here the files I promised.
#{{{ CREDITS
# Many thanks to (c) Michael Prokop [EMAIL PROTECTED]
40 matches
Mail list logo
