Randy McMurchy wrote:
I'm not getting much done anyway. I'm watching the Tulane Green
Wave play football on TV. My son doesn't play, but just stands on
the sideline in his uniform.
Your son's a cheerleader? :)
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromsc
Tushar Teredesai wrote these words on 10/08/05 18:05 CST:
> Randy, due to an oversight I also committed the change to
> BOOK/gnome/core/gnome-vfs.xml. I had to change it locally since my
> sandbox would not validate without it. Hopefully since I only changed
> fam to gamin in that file, it should
> If you don't mind, please don't update any of the core GNOME packages
> with the dependency change/update of FAM to Gamin. Many of the core
> GNOME packages are now updated in my sandbox, including the dependency
> sections, and any changes you make may not merge correctly.
Randy, due to an over
On Fri, 2005-10-07 at 00:42 -0400, Tushar Teredesai wrote:
> On 10/7/05, Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I could not tell from your previous message if you wanted me to go
> > ahead and add Gamin to the book, or if you are going to do it.
> >
> > If you are, what is the time frame
Randy McMurchy wrote:
But a bigger reason is the problem with the GNOME dependencies.
GNOME says use FAM. FAM doesn't work good. Gamin works better.
How can BLFS legitimately recommend Gamin as a dependency when
the GNOME devs say use FAM? Which won't work as is right now.
I really don't care.
Tushar Teredesai wrote these words on 10/06/05 23:42 CST:
> By Saturday.
Cool. Thanks.
--
Randy
rmlscsi: [GNU ld version 2.15.94.0.2 20041220] [gcc (GCC) 3.4.3]
[GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.4] [Linux 2.6.10 i686]
23:44:59 up 12 days, 8:09, 3 users, load average: 0.18, 0.09, 0.19
-
On 10/7/05, Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I could not tell from your previous message if you wanted me to go
> ahead and add Gamin to the book, or if you are going to do it.
>
> If you are, what is the time frame you are looking at?
By Saturday.
--
Tushar Teredesai
mailto:[EMAI
not tell from your previous message if you wanted me to go
ahead and add Gamin to the book, or if you are going to do it.
If you are, what is the time frame you are looking at?
Sorry to be a pest about this, but as I mentioned, I'd like to update
GNOME and the FAM/Gamin thing kind of stalls m
Randy McMurchy wrote:
> Alexander E. Patrakov wrote these words on 10/06/05 22:40 CST:
>
>
>>Theoretically, ill behavior is possible with the following scenario:
>>
>>host c1 mounts c2:/some/dir via nfs
>>
>>If both hosts run FAM, c1's FAM sometimes wants to contact c2's FAM via
>>c2's portmap.
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote these words on 10/06/05 22:40 CST:
> Theoretically, ill behavior is possible with the following scenario:
>
> host c1 mounts c2:/some/dir via nfs
>
> If both hosts run FAM, c1's FAM sometimes wants to contact c2's FAM via
> c2's portmap. If c2 in fact uses gamin, thi
Randy McMurchy wrote:
Hi all,
Has there been a decision reached on what to do with the FAM/Gamin
proposal of Tushar? I'm all in favor of removing FAM and adding
Gamin. It seems to work as expected with both GNOME and KDE, and I've
not noticed any ill behavior.
Theoretically, ill b
Jim Gifford wrote these words on 10/06/05 21:03 CST:
> Why not have both?
Because we don't need both. :-)
One is the same as the other.
But a bigger reason is the problem with the GNOME dependencies.
GNOME says use FAM. FAM doesn't work good. Gamin works better.
How can BLFS legitimately recomm
Why not have both?
People who are familiar with FAM can use, and the peole who want to use
Gamin can use it. Let the users choose which route they want to go,
instead for forcing one or the other on them.
--
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
LFS User # 2577
Registered Linux User # 2
On 10/6/05, Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tush, if you'd like I'll knock out the Gamin instructions and add
> it to BLFS if that is what the group has decided. Let me know.
>
Sounds good. Will wait for the final confirmation from Bruce before
putting it into the book.
How do we hand
Hi all,
Has there been a decision reached on what to do with the FAM/Gamin
proposal of Tushar? I'm all in favor of removing FAM and adding
Gamin. It seems to work as expected with both GNOME and KDE, and I've
not noticed any ill behavior.
In fact, my reported issue of the gam_server
15 matches
Mail list logo
