Re: Linux-PAM and Bekkeley DB

2011-10-30 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Wayne Blaszczyk wrote: On 30/10/11 09:43, Jeremy Huntwork wrote: On Oct 29, 2011, at 5:52 PM, Wayne Blaszczyk wrote: The Linux-PAM build fails for me, most likely due to the Bekkeley DB upgrade to 5.2.26. I get the following error: .libs/pam_userdb.o: In function `user_lookup':

Re: Linux-PAM and Bekkeley DB

2011-10-30 Thread Andrew Benton
On Sun, 30 Oct 2011 12:02:53 -0500 Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com wrote: Wayne Blaszczyk wrote: On 30/10/11 09:43, Jeremy Huntwork wrote: Try building db with --enable-dbm. Thanks, that worked. As mentioned by DJ in the previous post, I think this should be included in the standard

Re: Linux-PAM and Bekkeley DB

2011-10-30 Thread Wayne Blaszczyk
I don't generally use PAM, so I don't mind any changes to it. I'm curious though. What do others get from PAM? I don't see any advantages over plain shadow for a direct terminal or ssh login unless you have a lot of different users trying to login and you are trying to control that

Re: Linux-PAM and Bekkeley DB

2011-10-30 Thread DJ Lucas
On 10/30/2011 12:02 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: Wayne Blaszczyk wrote: On 30/10/11 09:43, Jeremy Huntwork wrote: On Oct 29, 2011, at 5:52 PM, Wayne Blaszczyk wrote: The Linux-PAM build fails for me, most likely due to the Bekkeley DB upgrade to 5.2.26. I get the following error:

Re: Linux-PAM and Bekkeley DB

2011-10-30 Thread Bruce Dubbs
DJ Lucas wrote: On 10/30/2011 12:02 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: Wayne Blaszczyk wrote: On 30/10/11 09:43, Jeremy Huntwork wrote: On Oct 29, 2011, at 5:52 PM, Wayne Blaszczyk wrote: The Linux-PAM build fails for me, most likely due to the Bekkeley DB upgrade to 5.2.26. I get the following error:

Re: Linux-PAM and Bekkeley DB

2011-10-29 Thread Wayne Blaszczyk
On 30/10/11 09:43, Jeremy Huntwork wrote: On Oct 29, 2011, at 5:52 PM, Wayne Blaszczyk wrote: The Linux-PAM build fails for me, most likely due to the Bekkeley DB upgrade to 5.2.26. I get the following error: .libs/pam_userdb.o: In function `user_lookup':