El Jueves, 28 de Abril de 2005 20:31, [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribiÃ:
> Author: bdubbs
> Date: 2005-04-28 12:31:48 -0600 (Thu, 28 Apr 2005)
> New Revision: 3818
>
> Modified:
>trunk/BOOK/template/template.xml
> Log:
> Updating the template for the current formatting standard.
Starting the work now
M.Canales.es wrote these words on 04/28/05 13:45 CST:
> Starting the work now.
>
> I will do the commits file to file, and in alphabetical dirs/files order
> (i.e., appendicex, basicnet, ), and trying to solve the possible svn
> conflicts in my end.
>
> But maybe some commits could be ove
El Jueves, 28 de Abril de 2005 21:03, Randy McMurchy escribió:
> I'm not sure that changes to the XML that don't affect any instructions
> really need to be included. In fact, most of the changes don't even
> affect rendering. I know I have not been including adding indexing
> tags and other non-v
M.Canales.es wrote these words on 04/28/05 14:10 CST:
> But if someone has in their working copy files allmost ready to commit using
> the old tag/indentation and that file has ben last updated by me, don't
> worry. Send your copy using yet the old style and I will retag/reindent it to
> the ne
Randy McMurchy wrote:
> I've not mentioned this yet, however, it's probably time to. I
> find the new indentation method to be *very* difficult to work
> with.
>
> What is the point in it?
>
> To me, it just makes the job of updating the packages more
> difficult. It should be the other way arou
