On 2020-04-04 07:40 +0200, Thomas Trepl via blfs-dev wrote:
> Am Freitag, den 27.03.2020, 22:13 +0800 schrieb Xi Ruoyao via blfs-
> dev:
> > It would make LLVM building system to build LLVMgold.so with Binutils
> > headers
> > installed in LFS, which is a linker plugin so we can use "clang -flto hw
Am Freitag, den 27.03.2020, 22:13 +0800 schrieb Xi Ruoyao via blfs-
dev:
> It would make LLVM building system to build LLVMgold.so with Binutils headers
> installed in LFS, which is a linker plugin so we can use "clang -flto hw.c".
What impact does it have if we do not add the -DLLVM switch.
In ge
On 4/3/20 2:01 PM, Jean-Marc Pigeon wrote:
On Fri, 2020-04-03 at 12:43 -0500, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
On 4/3/20 12:41 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
On 4/3/20 11:47 AM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
On Fri, 2020-04-03 at 10:18 -0500, Douglas R. Reno via blfs-dev
wrote:
On 4/3/20 9:35 AM
On Fri, 2020-04-03 at 12:43 -0500, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
> On 4/3/20 12:41 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> > On 4/3/20 11:47 AM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2020-04-03 at 10:18 -0500, Douglas R. Reno via blfs-dev
> > > wrote:
> > > > On 4/3/20 9:35 AM, Jean-Marc Pigeon via
On 4/3/20 1:25 PM, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
On 4/3/20 7:18 PM, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
On 4/3/20 2:56 AM, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
Hi all
I'm about to give the new dhcpcd 9.0.0 a go, which has quite an
important change: it does privilege separation now.
This means
On 4/3/20 11:47 AM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
On Fri, 2020-04-03 at 10:18 -0500, Douglas R. Reno via blfs-dev wrote:
On 4/3/20 9:35 AM, Jean-Marc Pigeon via blfs-dev wrote:
Hello,
According to me, kernel 5.6 is now "mainline" and stable.
Is there something wrong with 5.6 such LFS SV
On 4/3/20 12:41 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
On 4/3/20 11:47 AM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
On Fri, 2020-04-03 at 10:18 -0500, Douglas R. Reno via blfs-dev wrote:
On 4/3/20 9:35 AM, Jean-Marc Pigeon via blfs-dev wrote:
Hello,
According to me, kernel 5.6 is now "mainline" and stable.
Is th
On 4/3/20 9:35 AM, Jean-Marc Pigeon via blfs-dev wrote:
Hello,
According to me, kernel 5.6 is now "mainline" and stable.
Is there something wrong with 5.6 such LFS SVN-20200401
is not including the 5.6 family??
My own point of interest with 5.6 is the time_namespace
(for containers).
Is 5.6.2
On 4/3/20 2:56 AM, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
Hi all
I'm about to give the new dhcpcd 9.0.0 a go, which has quite an
important change: it does privilege separation now.
This means that an unprivileged user has to be created and that user
needs to have access to /var/lib/dhcpcd
I thou
On Fri, 2020-04-03 at 10:18 -0500, Douglas R. Reno via blfs-dev wrote:
> On 4/3/20 9:35 AM, Jean-Marc Pigeon via blfs-dev wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > According to me, kernel 5.6 is now "mainline" and stable.
> >
> > Is there something wrong with 5.6 such LFS SVN-20200401
> > is not including the 5.
On 4/3/20 9:35 AM, Jean-Marc Pigeon via blfs-dev wrote:
Hello,
According to me, kernel 5.6 is now "mainline" and stable.
Is there something wrong with 5.6 such LFS SVN-20200401
is not including the 5.6 family??
My own point of interest with 5.6 is the time_namespace
(for containers).
Is 5.6.
On 4/3/20 11:00 AM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
On Fri, 2020-04-03 at 09:56 +0200, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
Hi all
I'm about to give the new dhcpcd 9.0.0 a go, which has quite an
important change: it does privilege separation now.
This means that an unprivileged user has to b
Hello,
According to me, kernel 5.6 is now "mainline" and stable.
Is there something wrong with 5.6 such LFS SVN-20200401
is not including the 5.6 family??
My own point of interest with 5.6 is the time_namespace
(for containers).
Is 5.6.2 too new to be considered for the (B)LFS project?
--
You
On Fri, 2020-04-03 at 09:56 +0200, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I'm about to give the new dhcpcd 9.0.0 a go, which has quite an
> important change: it does privilege separation now.
>
> This means that an unprivileged user has to be created and that user
> needs to have access
Hi all
I'm about to give the new dhcpcd 9.0.0 a go, which has quite an
important change: it does privilege separation now.
This means that an unprivileged user has to be created and that user
needs to have access to /var/lib/dhcpcd
I thought of doing something similar to openssh:
install
15 matches
Mail list logo
