Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
Chris Staub wrote:
Compiling Xorg with GCC4 apparently results in a messed-up video
driver for certain hardware (like mine, for example). It seems
"libvgahw.a" has a problem that causes all the other consoles on my
system to go blank when X starts. I see that ther
Lennon Cook wrote:
./lib/mkmf.rb:291: [BUG] Segmentation fault
ruby 1.8.2 (2004-12-25) [i686-linux]
make: *** [all] Aborted
Is this a known problem? Is there any workaround/solution?
It appears to not like -fomit-frame-pointer. I threw everything else at
it without problems.
try:
Ken Moffat wrote:
My guess is that you've used a different combination of options, or
standard options in an unexpected context (x86_64) and X isn't smart
enough to realise where it put things.
To make things even worse, at some stage I decided to add a "/local/" to
all things I compiled/inst
Jens Olav Nygaard wrote:
I have been lucky enough to have everything to do with local
characters "just work" for many a year... But now I find myself
having to look into this "locale-thing".
My emacs will display special Norwegian characters in X for older
files. But it simply ignores keypresses
When compiling ruby as per the book, I get the following error:
>./lib/mkmf.rb:291: [BUG] Segmentation fault
>ruby 1.8.2 (2004-12-25) [i686-linux]
>
>make: *** [all] Aborted
Is this a known problem? Is there any workaround/solution?
--
Lennon Victor Cook
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/
Recently, Somebody Somewhere wrote these words
>
> So, now I wonder...
>
> 1) Who installs this, and missed it in my system? X? I could not find
>any clues scanning the topmost levels of the LFS+BLFS books for the
>term "locale".
Glibc installs to /usr/lib, and, I think /usr/local/share.
On Fri, 2005-07-29 at 23:57 +0200, Jens Olav Nygaard wrote:
> 1) Who installs this, and missed it in my system? X? I could not find
> any clues scanning the topmost levels of the LFS+BLFS books for the
> term "locale".
Individual packages install their own locale files - if you look furthe
NP wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Jul 2005, Declan Moriarty wrote:
>> c) Has anyone a handy process for scanning the book for items with no
>> dependencies?
>
> No, but here is my method to build a package without missing the
> required and desired optional dependancies :
>
> 1. Open a browser and clear the
