Re: MIME Types Forgotten

2005-11-16 Thread Simon Geard
On Wed, 2005-11-16 at 15:35 +1100, Lennon Cook wrote: I have done some uninstalling (of ~30 various libraries and apps I haven't used), and I seem to have uninstalled something important. Problem being, I'm not sure what it is. The symptoms: all of my files across my harddrive have lost their

Re: MIME Types Forgotten

2005-11-16 Thread Lennon Cook
Simon Geard wrote: Probably shared-mime-info. Maybe gnome-mime-data, though I doubt ROX uses that... shared-mime-info was still installed, but I removed it and reinstalled it, and it all works. Thanks for the help. :) -- Lennon Victor Cook --

eth0 not working properly !?

2005-11-16 Thread Kim Neunert
Hi, I recently finished with LFS book and now I try to get my Internet-connection working. First, I wondered that ifconfig is not installed. It seems, that link is another frontend to the ip interfaces ?! I installed ifconfig as described in BLFS. But I should proceed to my problem: pinging

Re: [OT] Sending 'clean' mail

2005-11-16 Thread Archaic
On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 08:06:45AM +, Declan Moriarty wrote: This is informational, as a lot of you seem to be using poorly configured mail servers without knowing it. There are 2 main errors: 1. Allowing IP addresses reserved for private networks onto the net, e.g. Received: from

Re: [OT] Sending 'clean' mail

2005-11-16 Thread Declan Moriarty
Recently, Somebody Somewhere wrote these words On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 08:06:45AM +, Declan Moriarty wrote: This is informational, as a lot of you seem to be using poorly configured mail servers without knowing it. There are 2 main errors: 1. Allowing IP addresses reserved for

Re: [OT] Sending 'clean' mail

2005-11-16 Thread Archaic
On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 12:31:58PM +, Declan Moriarty wrote: The numbers are 1. Internal IP 2.Modem's hostname 3. Reverse lookup, as I understand it, and that one is lifted from a legitimate mail. Correct, sortof. Technically, #2 is what the smtp server detects from the packet (which

Re: INIT bash

2005-11-16 Thread mess-mate
DJ Lucas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | mess-mate wrote: | ...snip.. If it can help somebody was a 'bashism' question. So take care. mess-mate -- Write yourself a threatening letter and pen a defiant reply. --

Re: [OT] Sending 'clean' mail

2005-11-16 Thread Justin Knierim
Declan Moriarty wrote: This is informational, as a lot of you seem to be using poorly configured mail servers without knowing it. There are 2 main errors: 1. Allowing IP addresses reserved for private networks onto the net, e.g. Received: from [192.168.1.45]

Re: [OT] Sending 'clean' mail

2005-11-16 Thread Andrew Benton
Declan Moriarty wrote: I'm on a bb modem like most folks and have to relay through my isp, and only get through because I'm in their network range. I _do_not_receive_ at smtp level. It's pop3. SA is therefore a must for the likes of me, who doesn't want to look at spam. It's not essential.

Re: [OT] Sending 'clean' mail

2005-11-16 Thread Doug Reich
It's not essential. You could try Mozilla Thunderbird. It's built in junk mail filtering works quite well. Aside from the mail reader being a matter of preference, your solution isn't always applicable. Personally, I check my mail from at least 4 different mail clients, which aren't all even

Kernel Patch for UDF on CD-RW and DVD

2005-11-16 Thread Dan McGhee
Getting ready to install CD/DVD burning capability. Both the stable and development versions of the book contain directions for installing a patch for packet handling to kernel 2.6.8-2. I'm currently running 2.6.11.11 and I can configure CDROM_PKTCDVD. Is this the appropriate packet

Get native or die!

2005-11-16 Thread Ali Servet Donmez
Hi, # Information # I'm succeed with blfs-book-6.1. I've installed my system almost how lfs says, besides some *non-important* programs, just like text editor. # Get native or die # Since i wanted to avoid possible problems during installation i didn't changed default locale

Re: Get native or die!

2005-11-16 Thread Andrew Benton
Ali Servet Donmez wrote: I'm aware that, LFS does not reccomend or support Unicode support; but since i'm more confused with every document that i read about locales, keymaps, lang. supports, iso, UTF etc. this is still a valid question: Alexander Patrakov has been working on a UTF-8

Re: INIT bash

2005-11-16 Thread DJ Lucas
mess-mate wrote: FOUND ! It's not a bash but an ASH bug ??? After checking the /bin/sh link it was linked to /ban/ash ( yes, i've installed ash as always) Removing that link and relink it to /bin/bash SOLVED the problem. So can ot be an ash bug ??? Actually, it is a bootscript bug.

Re: [OT] Sending 'clean' mail

2005-11-16 Thread Jason Gurtz
On 11/16/2005 12:21, Justin Knierim wrote: Yeah, that would be from one of my emails. While it is true that header won't resolve, I don't see it as being incorrect. I'm not sure if I see it as being incorrect either. From what I understand, large userbase setups that use various levels of