DJ Lucas wrote:
> On 11/19/2011 02:51 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
>>> I do not know to which list should I address this.
>>>
>>> I am having a little trouble with the messages, now that I am trying
>>> to follow more than one *lfs* list. Worse, when the same message is a
>
On 11/19/2011 02:51 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
>> I do not know to which list should I address this.
>>
>> I am having a little trouble with the messages, now that I am trying
>> to follow more than one *lfs* list. Worse, when the same message is a
>> notification simultan
--- Em sáb, 19/11/11, Bruce Dubbs escreveu:
> De: Bruce Dubbs
> Assunto: Re: [blfs-support] Request
> Para: "BLFS Support List"
> Data: Sábado, 19 de Novembro de 2011, 18:51
> Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
...
> > I am having a little trouble with the messages, now
> that I am trying
> > to fol
Andrew Benton wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 10:43:24 -0800 (PST) Fernando de Oliveira
> wrote:
>
>> These days, most signatures I check with gpg --verify are from
>> previous versions of packages, so I believe they are trustable (if
>> there is this word in English).
>
> It looks like a word to m
On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 10:43:24 -0800 (PST)
Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
> These days, most signatures I check with gpg --verify are from previous
> versions of packages, so I believe they are trustable (if there is this word
> in English).
It looks like a word to me :)
Andy
--
http://linuxfroms
Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
> I do not know to which list should I address this.
>
> I am having a little trouble with the messages, now that I am trying
> to follow more than one *lfs* list. Worse, when the same message is a
> notification simultaneously sent to more than one list.
>
> I would l
I do not know to which list should I address this.
I am having a little trouble with the messages, now that I am trying to follow
more than one *lfs* list. Worse, when the same message is a notification
simultaneously sent to more than one list.
I would like to suggest, to the maintainers (Bruc
Something should be added:
--- Em sáb, 19/11/11, Fernando de Oliveira escreveu:
> De: Fernando de Oliveira
> Assunto: Re: Linux-PAM-1.1.3 and LFS 7.0
> Para: "BLFS Support List"
> Data: Sábado, 19 de Novembro de 2011, 16:43
...
>
> Sorry for the late reply. I see it has been properly
> repli
--- Em sex, 18/11/11, Wayne Blaszczyk escreveu:
> De: Wayne Blaszczyk
> Assunto: Re: Linux-PAM-1.1.3 and LFS 7.0
> Para: blfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org
> Data: Sexta-feira, 18 de Novembro de 2011, 19:30
> On 19/11/11 02:02, Fernando de
> Oliveira wrote:
> > --- Em sex, 18/11/11, Wayne Blaszcz
I might be able to help with some of the porting I suppose. I've done
a fair bit of hacking on some of the scripts and could make some diffs
if time permits. But I can't really take too active a role since my
own computer is not network connected, so using svn/cvs/git are not an
option for me. At l
Andrew Benton wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 10:36:11 -0500
> Nathan Fisher wrote:
>
>> That would work too. But would you have to modify the dbus init script
>> for the new path then?
>
> Yes, you're right, the BLFS dbus bootscript would need to be altered if
> the paths to the pid file and socke
On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 10:36:11 -0500
Nathan Fisher wrote:
> That would work too. But would you have to modify the dbus init script
> for the new path then?
Yes, you're right, the BLFS dbus bootscript would need to be altered if
the paths to the pid file and socket are changed.
Andy
--
http://lin
That would work too. But would you have to modify the dbus init script
for the new path then?
Dan
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 10:32 AM, Andrew Benton wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 00:25:46 +1100
> Wayne Blaszczyk wrote:
>
>> I'm currently looking at getting dbus to start under LFS 7.0 as I was
>> ge
On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 00:25:46 +1100
Wayne Blaszczyk wrote:
> I'm currently looking at getting dbus to start under LFS 7.0 as I was
> getting the following error:
>
> Failed to bind socket "/var/run/dbus/system_bus_socket": No such file or
> directory
>
> I did manual re-create the dbus directory
You may have to add a line to the "createfiles" bootscript. In fact I
think I did myself.
Dan
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 8:25 AM, Wayne Blaszczyk
wrote:
> I'm currently looking at getting dbus to start under LFS 7.0 as I was
> getting the following error:
>
> Failed to bind socket "/var/run/dbus/sy
I'm currently looking at getting dbus to start under LFS 7.0 as I was
getting the following error:
Failed to bind socket "/var/run/dbus/system_bus_socket": No such file or
directory
I did manual re-create the dbus directory under /run and it seemed to
fix the problem, but I'm worried that there m
16 matches
Mail list logo
