On 11/20/2011 07:32 AM, luxInteg wrote:
> Greetings
>
> Suppose I have two private IPv4-assigned networks with addresses
> --network 1:- 10.255.255.y
> --network 2:- 172.31.255.x
>
> can I configure bind (as per
> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/svn/server/bind.html )
> to do names r
--- Em dom, 20/11/11, Simon Geard escreveu:
> De: Simon Geard
> Assunto: Re: [blfs-support] Linux-PAM-1.1.3 and LFS 7.0
> Para: blfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org
> Data: Domingo, 20 de Novembro de 2011, 6:17
> On Sat, 2011-11-19 at 10:43 -0800,
> Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
> > I do not mind abo
--- Em sáb, 19/11/11, Bruce Dubbs escreveu:
> De: Bruce Dubbs
> Assunto: Re: Linux-PAM-1.1.3 and LFS 7.0
> Para: "BLFS Support List"
> Data: Sábado, 19 de Novembro de 2011, 20:05
> Andrew Benton wrote:
> > On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 10:43:24 -0800 (PST) Fernando de
> Oliveira
> >
> wrote:
> >
> >> T
On Sunday 20 November 2011 12:37:55 Andrew Benton wrote:
> What sort of network are you talking about? is it hundreds of machines?
smallish networks BUT the clients use he BIND server(s) for names resolution
for machines on the 'inter-net'
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-
On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 13:32:45 +
luxInteg wrote:
> Greetings
>
> Suppose I have two private IPv4-assigned networks with addresses
> --network 1:- 10.255.255.y
> --network 2:- 172.31.255.x
>
> can I configure bind (as per
> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/svn/server/bind.html
Greetings
Suppose I have two private IPv4-assigned networks with addresses
--network 1:- 10.255.255.y
--network 2:- 172.31.255.x
can I configure bind (as per
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/svn/server/bind.html )
to do names resolutions for hosts in both subnets
and if so how
On 11/19/2011 06:59 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
> For my client (seamonkey), the Reply-to: is visible. Return-Path: is
> not. Besides the return path is
> which is slightly confusing.
Yeah, you have to add it. Unfortunately, I've been using that and
carrying over for so long, I really don't rec
On Sat, 2011-11-19 at 16:53 -0600, DJ Lucas wrote:
> On 11/19/2011 02:51 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> > I'll take a look and see what I can do, but I've had filters for years
> > on the Reply-To: address. That is:
> >
> > BLFS Support List
> > LFS Support List
> >
> > etc.
> >
> > -- Bruce
>
> I'
On Sat, 2011-11-19 at 10:43 -0800, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
> I do not mind about the WARNING and do no sign. In the beginning, I
> searched about this and the conclusion was that if someone posted
> signatures with wrong intentions it would be spotted, so I waited one
> day and then, trusted it
