They all should be at www.linuxfromscratch.org/patches.
Thanks - I'll use that url
2) Xorg - some files are stored under Xorg but other are under x.
Some are in both. For e.g. Xorg-server-1.12.2 is under Xorg while
Xorg-server-1.12.4 is under the letter x. 1.12.4 is the one in the
John Burrell wrote:
2) Xorg - some files are stored under Xorg but other are under x.
Some are in both. For e.g. Xorg-server-1.12.2 is under Xorg while
Xorg-server-1.12.4 is under the letter x. 1.12.4 is the one in the
book.
The xorg part of the book was rewritten a while ago. I can make
Things are definitely looking better.
MesaLib-8.0.3 is under Xorg but MesaLib-8.0.4 is still under m. Would you move
it please.
That brings me to another question - sorry about this.
As BLFS is now a rolling update, there should only be one version of each
package in the dirs. Can you remove
John Burrell wrote:
Things are definitely looking better.
MesaLib-8.0.3 is under Xorg but MesaLib-8.0.4 is still under m. Would
you move it please.
OK.
That brings me to another question - sorry about this.
As BLFS is now a rolling update, there should only be one version of
each
If you see an old package in the svn tree, let me know.
I will. But you could write a script to check it all. If you ignore the patch
files, you could test that each package name only occurs twice - the source and
the md5sum. The script could then output any name that occurred more than
John Burrell wrote:
If you see an old package in the svn tree, let me know.
I will. But you could write a script to check it all. If you ignore
the patch files, you could test that each package name only occurs
twice - the source and the md5sum. The script could then output any
name that
John Burrell wrote:
I attach an outline script to test for older versions of a package.
If more than two occurrences of the package name are found, it prints
outthe name and how many times it occurred.Should always be an even
number. I haven't tested it of course, but hopefully it won't take
