I got the mach64-6.8.0 driver and added it to the driver list. Then
thinking the ati-6.6.3 driver was still going to identify the mach64
video just as it had before and I needed an ati driver with the mach64
stuff removed, I got the ati-6.[89].0 drivers and tried each of them.
Neither would compil
> Is /dev/shm a tmpfs or a symlink to /run/shm, are the permissions
correct?
it is a symlink to /run/shm
lrwxrwxrwx root root /dev/shm -> /run/shm
drwxr-xr-x root root /run/shm
and I have no idea how to change it
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linux
On 01/28/2013 10:54 AM, Randy McMurchy wrote:
> Fernando de Oliveira wrote these words on 01/28/13 10:41 CST:
>> Forwarded from the "BLFS Book Maintenance List" list.
>>
>> Sorry for top posting.
>>
>> Thanks, Randy.
>
>
> Though essentially the same thing Bruce said, here is what I do at the
> com
On 01/29/2013 12:13 AM, Kenno Han wrote:
> > How do you start it? Which DE/WM?
> With XFCE4
>
> > Did you had Linux PAM installed when you've built ConsoleKit?
> Do I need it?
>
Yes, it is not recommended without a reason. We treat recommended
packages in nearly the same way we treat Required,
On 01/28/2013 01:47 PM, Jean-Philippe MENGUAL wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks very much, this helps a lot. I didn't experience any problems following
> the process. But I still get:
>
> fetchmail: No mail for moderate...@absolinux.net at imap.1and1.fr
> fetchmail: Server certificate verification error: sel
> How do you start it? Which DE/WM?
With XFCE4
> Did you had Linux PAM installed when you've built ConsoleKit?
Do I need it?
Also, I notice the warning:
shm_open(): Permission denied
doesn't appear when with root
On 01/28/2013 10:55 PM, Kenno Han wrote:
> Hi, I have built ConsoleKit and run it wi
On 01/28/2013 10:55 PM, Kenno Han wrote:
> Hi, I have built ConsoleKit and run it with X. Now I have lost the ACPI
> capabilities. This includes the stand by button, shut down button, and
> many more.
>
> I suspect that the root of this mess is the permission problem because
> these functions can r
Hi, I have built ConsoleKit and run it with X. Now I have lost the ACPI
capabilities. This includes the stand by button, shut down button, and many
more.
I suspect that the root of this mess is the permission problem because
these functions can run when I run startx as root.
Any help would be app
Hi,
Thanks very much, this helps a lot. I didn't experience any problems following
the process. But I still get:
fetchmail: No mail for moderate...@absolinux.net at imap.1and1.fr
fetchmail: Server certificate verification error: self signed certificate in
certificate chain
fetchmail: This mean
Randy McMurchy wrote:
> Thomas de Roo wrote these words on 01/28/13 09:41 CST:
>> On 01/28/13 16:33, Randy McMurchy wrote:
>>> configure:16159: $? = 1
>>> configure:16144: re-using the existing conftest.o
>>> configure:16150: g++ -o conftest -g -O2 -D_REENTRANT
>>> -DMDDS_HASH_CONTAINER_BOOST
>>>
On 01/28/2013 05:20 PM, Dr.-Ing. Edgar Alwers wrote:
> Hi Armin,
>
> On Sunday 27 January 2013 22:38:39 Armin K. wrote:
>
>>
>
>> Ah, did you install firmware for your chip?
>
> Yes, I had. iwl3945. And it is working well with wicd. However, I loaded
> down
>
> all iwlwifi- as you said, to lib/firm
Fernando de Oliveira wrote these words on 01/28/13 10:41 CST:
> Forwarded from the "BLFS Book Maintenance List" list.
>
> Sorry for top posting.
>
> Thanks, Randy.
Though essentially the same thing Bruce said, here is what I do at the
completion of LFS. Simply modify the log file locations and
Forwarded from the "BLFS Book Maintenance List" list.
Sorry for top posting.
Thanks, Randy.
A power failure (perhaps a nobreak defect) earlier delayed me very
much. I intend do follow your and Bruce's instructions and will report
the gain in space, but perhaps only tomorrow.
Thanks, again,
Thomas de Roo wrote these words on 01/28/13 09:41 CST:
> On 01/28/13 16:33, Randy McMurchy wrote:
>> configure:16159: $? = 1
>> configure:16144: re-using the existing conftest.o
>> configure:16150: g++ -o conftest -g -O2 -D_REENTRANT
>> -DMDDS_HASH_CONTAINER_BOOST
>> -I/home/rml/build/libixion_0.
On 01/28/13 16:33, Randy McMurchy wrote:
> On 1/28/2013 9:17 AM, Armin K. wrote:
>> You can try adding -lboost_system to LDFLAGS.
>>
>> Gnash had similar issue with Boost 1.49 and later iirc.
> Armin is exactly right. The following is from config.log when I just ran
> configure for version 0.3.0 of
On 1/28/2013 9:17 AM, Armin K. wrote:
> You can try adding -lboost_system to LDFLAGS.
>
> Gnash had similar issue with Boost 1.49 and later iirc.
Armin is exactly right. The following is from config.log when I just ran
configure for version 0.3.0 of libixion:
configure:16159: $? = 1
configure:161
On 01/28/2013 03:53 PM, Thomas de Roo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On my way to LibreOffice 4, I'm trying to compile libixion. I have boost
> installed, but configure throws an error:
> ...
> checking if g++ supports -c -o file.o... (cached) yes
> checking whether the g++ linker (/usr/bin/ld) supports share
Hello,
On my way to LibreOffice 4, I'm trying to compile libixion. I have boost
installed, but configure throws an error:
...
checking if g++ supports -c -o file.o... (cached) yes
checking whether the g++ linker (/usr/bin/ld) supports shared
libraries... yes
checking dynamic linker characteristi
>On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 23:54:50 +1300
>Simon Geard wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2013-01-27 at 14:55 +, lux-integ wrote:
> > I have sftp but since it is only data between two neighbouring
> > machines I thought a simple even if insucure
> > method would suffice. Advice and suggestions on available f
On Sun, 2013-01-27 at 14:55 +, lux-integ wrote:
> I have sftp but since it is only data between two neighbouring machines I
> thought a simple even if insucure
> method would suffice. Advice and suggestions on available ftp clients would
> be much appreciated.
My advice would be not t
On Sun, 2013-01-27 at 12:25 -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Simon Geard wrote:
> > On Sat, 2013-01-26 at 16:07 -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> >> systemd has/needs over 100 pages of documentation. Myth or fact?
> >
> > I'm astonished... that's the first time I've seen "well documented" used
> > as critici
On Sun, 2013-01-27 at 12:35 -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> What about the 45 scripts in BLFS? I know very few, if any, users need
> all of them, but they all would need to be addressed.
Packages are increasingly starting to include systemd service files as
standard - things like dbus, gdm, NetworkM
22 matches
Mail list logo
