Re: [blfs-support] gvolwheel

2013-10-04 Thread Ken Moffat
On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 05:34:16AM +0200, Igor Živković wrote: > On 10/04/2013 04:12 AM, Aleksandar Kuktin wrote: > >> On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 02:38:58 +0100 > >> Ken Moffat wrote: > >> > >> Is anyone apart from me using gvolwheel ? > >> > >> [snip] > >> > >> In the meantime, comments from anyone e

Re: [blfs-support] google chrome browser building woes

2013-10-04 Thread alex lupu
Hi Bruce: > I changed the 404 page to provide links to gmane. I apologize for the previous top post. Them google guys with their #$%^&*!~ Gmail did it to me agian! Thanks, -- Alex -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Uns

Re: [blfs-support] google chrome browser building woes

2013-10-04 Thread Bruce Dubbs
alex lupu wrote: > Hi Bruce: > >>> PSs 1. Sorry for sending you to a foreign site. Our BLFS Archive is >>> temporarily unavailable. Could be them guys at Google again? > >> It's not temporary. Some places download everything regardless of >> robots.txt. It a cost of bandwidth issue. > > 10-4

Re: [blfs-support] google chrome browser building woes

2013-10-04 Thread alex lupu
Hi Bruce: >> PSs 1. Sorry for sending you to a foreign site. Our BLFS Archive is >> temporarily unavailable. Could be them guys at Google again? > It's not temporary. Some places download everything regardless of > robots.txt. It a cost of bandwidth issue. 10-4 Humble suggestion. Instead

Re: [blfs-support] google chrome browser building woes

2013-10-04 Thread Bruce Dubbs
alex lupu wrote: > Hi Integ, > > You're out of luck. > A lot of things have changed in this decade. > Google even changed their browser name from "chrome" to "chrome"(!) :) > For perfect elucidation of the above, read thread: > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lfs.beyond.support/47303 > > On t

[blfs-support] google chrome browser building woes

2013-10-04 Thread alex lupu
Hi Integ, You're out of luck. A lot of things have changed in this decade. Google even changed their browser name from "chrome" to "chrome"(!) :) For perfect elucidation of the above, read thread: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lfs.beyond.support/47303 On top of all that, it's been close so

Re: [blfs-support] gvolwheel

2013-10-04 Thread Aleksandar Kuktin
>On Fri, 04 Oct 2013 05:34:16 +0200 >Igor Živković wrote: > > On 10/04/2013 04:12 AM, Aleksandar Kuktin wrote: > >> On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 02:38:58 +0100 > >> Ken Moffat wrote: > >> > >> Is anyone apart from me using gvolwheel ? > >> > >> [snip] > >> > >> In the meantime, comments from anyone els

Re: [blfs-support] GNOME replacement

2013-10-04 Thread Simon Geard
On Thu, 2013-10-03 at 10:42 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > This is an interesting idea, but I have a few questions about it. I > don't know how well it's supported. From what I can tell, it's based on > GTK+2 and I don't know how well that will continue to be supported. Poorly, is my outsider imp

Re: [blfs-support] Time discrepency LFS 7.2 64bit/BLFS various

2013-10-04 Thread Matt Burgess
On Thu, 2013-10-03 at 10:01 +0100, Richard Melville wrote: > I don't appear to have either the "posix" directory or the "right" > directory. > As I was building a stripped-down system I must have followed the > suggestion to > omit them, and now, maybe, this has come back to bite me. I'm > assum

Re: [blfs-support] Time discrepency LFS 7.2 64bit/BLFS various

2013-10-04 Thread Richard Melville
> > Richard Melville wrote: > > +kvm02-vps.cleve 31.193.9.2 3 u17 1024 377 25.130 0.444 1.359 > > -mail1.ugh.no 87.195.109.207 3 u 759 1024 377 25.171 1.858 0.419 > > *sexrobot.omg.omg 103.7.151.4 2 u 1008 1024 377 20.553 -1.584 1.428 > > +hemel-hempstead 140.203.204.77 2