Re: [blfs-support] Wifi Operations--Again

On Sun, 2013-11-03 at 17:16 -0600, Dan McGhee wrote: > I was discussing this on the LFS-support list because I'm trying to do > it in chroot. If actually bringing up a wireless card is possible in > chroot, then I'm in a dhcpd and wpa_supplicant situation. > > First question, does anyone know i

Re: [blfs-support] noshell

On Sun, 2013-11-03 at 11:03 -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > I'm unaware why noshell would be an advantage over /bin/false. What > does it do that is needed? Most google results indicate that it's to do with logging - that noshell will report that someone attempted to obtain a shell as a system user,

Re: [blfs-support] at-spi2-core-2.10.1 build fails

On Sun, 2013-11-03 at 14:39 -0300, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: > This must be related to gobject-introspection. Is it installed? It's definitely installed, because that's precisely the thing failing... the invocation of /usr/local/bin/g-ir-scanner. A quick look at the code appearing in the stack

Re: [blfs-support] Wifi Operations--Again

Em 04-11-2013 01:40, Bruce Dubbs escreveu: > Ken Moffat wrote: >> On Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 09:47:07PM -0300, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: >>> Em 03-11-2013 21:13, Dan McGhee escreveu: On 11/03/2013 05:42 PM, Ken Moffat wrote: > On Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 05:16:23PM -0600, Dan McGhee wrote:

Re: [blfs-support] Wifi Operations--Again

Ken Moffat wrote: > On Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 09:47:07PM -0300, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: >> Em 03-11-2013 21:13, Dan McGhee escreveu: >>> On 11/03/2013 05:42 PM, Ken Moffat wrote: On Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 05:16:23PM -0600, Dan McGhee wrote: > First question, does anyone know if it's even p

Re: [blfs-support] Wifi Operations--Again

On 11/03/2013 08:02 PM, Ken Moffat wrote: > On Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 06:13:25PM -0600, Dan McGhee wrote: >> On 11/03/2013 05:42 PM, Ken Moffat wrote: >>>Actually, if at all possible I'd use a wired network while >>> building (faster downloads) and when first booting. >> In my house it is possibl

Re: [blfs-support] Wifi Operations--Again

On 11/03/2013 07:59 PM, Ken Moffat wrote: > On Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 09:47:07PM -0300, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: >> Em 03-11-2013 21:13, Dan McGhee escreveu: >>> On 11/03/2013 05:42 PM, Ken Moffat wrote: On Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 05:16:23PM -0600, Dan McGhee wrote: > First question, does an

Re: [blfs-support] Wifi Operations--Again

On Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 06:13:25PM -0600, Dan McGhee wrote: > On 11/03/2013 05:42 PM, Ken Moffat wrote: > > Actually, if at all possible I'd use a wired network while > > building (faster downloads) and when first booting. > In my house it is possible. But I don't have a 20 ft cable. :) > For

Re: [blfs-support] Wifi Operations--Again

On Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 09:47:07PM -0300, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: > Em 03-11-2013 21:13, Dan McGhee escreveu: > > On 11/03/2013 05:42 PM, Ken Moffat wrote: > >> On Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 05:16:23PM -0600, Dan McGhee wrote: > >>> First question, does anyone know if it's even possible to do this in

Re: [blfs-support] Wifi Operations--Again

Em 03-11-2013 21:13, Dan McGhee escreveu: > On 11/03/2013 05:42 PM, Ken Moffat wrote: >> On Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 05:16:23PM -0600, Dan McGhee wrote: >>> First question, does anyone know if it's even possible to do this in >>> chroot? There is one thing I am trying to understand. Forgive-me if I am

Re: [blfs-support] Wifi Operations--Again

On 11/03/2013 05:42 PM, Ken Moffat wrote: > On Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 05:16:23PM -0600, Dan McGhee wrote: >> First question, does anyone know if it's even possible to do this in >> chroot? I have never had much luck building BLFS packages in a non X >> situation. Therefore, it's easier for me to bu

Re: [blfs-support] Wifi Operations--Again

On Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 05:16:23PM -0600, Dan McGhee wrote: > > First question, does anyone know if it's even possible to do this in > chroot? I have never had much luck building BLFS packages in a non X > situation. Therefore, it's easier for me to build in chroot until Xorg > is installed.

[blfs-support] Wifi Operations--Again

I was discussing this on the LFS-support list because I'm trying to do it in chroot. If actually bringing up a wireless card is possible in chroot, then I'm in a dhcpd and wpa_supplicant situation. First question, does anyone know if it's even possible to do this in chroot? I have never had m

Re: [blfs-support] Xorg-7.7 Does not Detect Input Devices on 64-bit Build

On Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 04:52:35PM -0300, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: > > ĸen, > > Sometimes I have some libtool complaints. Fox example, dozens of the kind: > > libtool: relink: warning: > `/usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.8.1/../../../libcairo.la' seems to be > moved > > I gave up removing th

Re: [blfs-support] at-spi2-core-2.10.1 build fails

Em 03-11-2013 15:49, Ken Moffat escreveu: > On Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 02:39:31PM -0300, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: >> Em 03-11-2013 13:58, Bruce Dubbs escreveu: >>> John Frankish wrote: Ref: Beyond Linux(r) From Scratch - Version 2013-11-01, at-spi2-core-2.10.1: The build fails

Re: [blfs-support] Xorg-7.7 Does not Detect Input Devices on 64-bit Build

Em 03-11-2013 12:54, Ken Moffat escreveu: > As long as /lib64 is a symlink to /lib, everything just works. It > isn't strictly 'pure' (libtool complains that files seem to be > moved, which I'm sure is because of the symlink) but it works > well-enough and allows for the occasional stupid packag

Re: [blfs-support] at-spi2-core-2.10.1 build fails

On Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 02:39:31PM -0300, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: > Em 03-11-2013 13:58, Bruce Dubbs escreveu: > > John Frankish wrote: > >> Ref: Beyond Linux(r) From Scratch - Version 2013-11-01, > >> at-spi2-core-2.10.1: > >> > >> The build fails with > >> > >> CC libatspi_la-atspi-val

Re: [blfs-support] at-spi2-core-2.10.1 build fails

Em 03-11-2013 13:58, Bruce Dubbs escreveu: > John Frankish wrote: >> Ref: Beyond Linux(r) From Scratch - Version 2013-11-01, at-spi2-core-2.10.1: >> >> The build fails with >> >> CC libatspi_la-atspi-value.lo >> CCLD libatspi.la >> GISCAN Atspi-2.0.gir > >> OSError: [Errno 2] No such f

Re: [blfs-support] Process accounting

Am Sonntag, 3. November 2013, 16:30:32 schrieb Richard Melville: > Still on the subject of server hardening I was looking for > acct-6.6.1.tar.gz in the > BLFS book and couldn't find it. Is there any reason why this is omitted; > has process accountin

Re: [blfs-support] noshell

Richard Melville wrote: > Does anybody have any experience of noshell as a replacement for /bin/false > and /dev/null? I realise that it's quite old, but is it still useful as a > more secure way of creating a user with no login shell? > > Fish.com, together with the titan hardening package, seems

Re: [blfs-support] libvpx-v1.2.0 MD5SUM

Fernando de Oliveira wrote: > Em 02-11-2013 23:29, Fernando de Oliveira escreveu: >> Em 02-11-2013 23:14, alex lupu escreveu: >>> Is libvpx-v1.2.0 MD5SUM correct? >>> 4eab3775d178d44e084525ed978bcd9a >>> (BLFS book, version 2013-11-01) >>> >>> My calculations seem to show >>> f8de058e6ba14555144583

Re: [blfs-support] at-spi2-core-2.10.1 build fails

John Frankish wrote: > Ref: Beyond Linux(r) From Scratch - Version 2013-11-01, at-spi2-core-2.10.1: > > The build fails with > > CC libatspi_la-atspi-value.lo > CCLD libatspi.la > GISCAN Atspi-2.0.gir > OSError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory > Is there a way to force make to pro

[blfs-support] Process accounting

Still on the subject of server hardening I was looking for acct-6.6.1.tar.gz in the BLFS book and couldn't find it. Is there any reason why this is omitted; has process accounting been superseded by something else? Richard -- http://linuxfromscratch

Re: [blfs-support] Xorg-7.7 Does not Detect Input Devices on 64-bit Build

On Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 07:17:22AM +, John Frankish wrote: > > > > > > It's a bit hard to diagnose when you use /usr/local/lib (it > > *always* gets harder to build things correctly, e.g. PKG_CONFIG_PATH > > needs to be set), and *my* modules are all in > > /usr/lib/X11/modules/{,drivers/,input

[blfs-support] noshell

Does anybody have any experience of noshell as a replacement for /bin/false and /dev/null? I realise that it's quite old, but is it still useful as a more secure way of creating a user with no login shell? Fish.com, together with the titan hardening package, seems to have morphed into a a tropica

Re: [blfs-support] libvpx-v1.2.0 MD5SUM

Em 02-11-2013 23:29, Fernando de Oliveira escreveu: > Em 02-11-2013 23:14, alex lupu escreveu: >> Is libvpx-v1.2.0 MD5SUM correct? >> 4eab3775d178d44e084525ed978bcd9a >> (BLFS book, version 2013-11-01) >> >> My calculations seem to show >> f8de058e6ba14555144583a2d031fe19 > http://webm.googlecode

Re: [blfs-support] Xorg-7.7 Does not Detect Input Devices on 64-bit Build

> > > Do you have somthing like: > > > [25.470] (II) LoadModule: "evdev" > > > in the log? > > > If not, It might be that you forgot to compile the evdev driver. (see > > > Xorg drivers page). > > > > > > > > No, I don't have anything like LoadModule: "evdev", but the evdev driver is > > the

[blfs-support] at-spi2-core-2.10.1 build fails

Ref: Beyond Linux(r) From Scratch - Version 2013-11-01, at-spi2-core-2.10.1: The build fails with CC libatspi_la-atspi-value.lo CCLD libatspi.la GISCAN Atspi-2.0.gir Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/local/bin/g-ir-scanner", line 46, in sys.exit(scanner_main(sys.arg