On 12/11/07, Andrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> May be
> some one know, what happened with main site namesys?
I can't answer your question, but here is a reiser4 link I find useful.
http://pub.namesys.com/Reiser4/ToDo
Loo
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http:/
> Take a look at ' Why we copy the kernel headers and don't symlink them'
> http://archive.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs-museum/5.0/LFS-BOOK-5.0-HTML/chapter06/kernel.html
>
> Reading that paragraph, and reading the cdrecord notes, I think
> what's happening is cdrecord is looking for the '/usr/src/lin
Conclusion:
The wiki for building GTK-DFB on top of DirectFB has just been
updated, and it appears more robust/refined than the hint I was going
to write. I no longer see a need for a separate BLFS hint, so I won't
be writting one. The link is below:
http://directfb.org/wiki/index.php/Projects:
Update:
I have successfully installed directfb and gtk-dfb. Unfortunately,
due to gtk-dfb lacking several key functions from the regular gtk, few
packages will actually run on it. Newer versions of gimp will no
longer run (confirmed bug), and neither will most packages I've tried
because they eit
On 10/11/07, Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is old and obsolete information. However, if you omit "in the
> linux-libc-headers package" from the last sentence, then it would be
> accurate.
>
> So, the sentence should be:
>
> "As of the Linux 2.6 kernel series, this directory shoul
linux-libc-headers package
during the base LFS installation.
Loo
On 10/11/07, Ken Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 11:37:01PM -0400, Barry Loo wrote:
> > FYI
> > I just sucessfully built my os, including cdrtools, with the actual
> > ke
FYI
I just sucessfully built my os, including cdrtools, with the actual
kernel headers instead of the linux-libc-headers package. The
relevant package versions I have on my system include the following:
Binutils 2.18
Linux 2.6.22
Glibc 2.6.1
Gcc 4.2.1
Also, I've built about 120 other packages, m
Thanks to everyone for the info. I'll post a hint once I get directfb working.
Loo
On 10/1/07, Alan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Would be indeed interested. Did not have a lot of time to dig around
> when I was getting more core up, but wanted a graphical browser for my
> home automation, but n
Richard,
Are you using the kernel headers from the linux-libc-headers package?
Also, I would be interested in that patch if you still have it on file
as well as any additional docs/scripts you have.
Loo
On 10/1/07, Alan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Would be indeed interested. Did not have a lot
After doing some research, it seems like directfb would be the easiest
way to put gimp on on an lfs machine. It also seems that installing
it isn't easy enough for _me_. Is there any interest among the blfs
developers to write/update the directfb build instructions? Directfb
will be very popular
10 matches
Mail list logo
