Archaic wrote:
> On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 05:15:43PM -0400, Jon Grosshart wrote:
>
>>As I stated earlier, many of my older/working drivers are breaking
>>with each subsquient release of 2.6.xx
>
>
> Can't you save yourself a lot of hassle and stop upgrading t
Ken Moffat wrote:
>On Mon, 9 May 2005, Jon Grosshart wrote:
>
>>Okay... I'll have to check it out. Thanks for the input. It took me
>>months to get to the point where I'm at now. Used pkgtool and am at
>>307 packages and counting Theres no way in hell I&
On 5/8/05, Archaic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 06:36:21PM -0400, Jon Grosshart wrote:
> > O.k... I did use that switch as per the books instructions. So thats
> > the only thing holding me up then? If I were to rebuild glibc and omit
> > --enab
O.k... I did use that switch as per the books instructions. So thats
the only thing holding me up then? If I were to rebuild glibc and omit
--enable-add-ons=nptl I'd be good to go?
Thanks again...
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blf
Is this possible once I have built everything with the 2.6.8.1 kernel?
My expierences over the past year hasn't been very favorable. The 2.6
branch is in constant flux and is beaking alot of drivers that I still
have need for. I downgraded flex to 2.5.4a to get rid of the lex error
on modutils-2.4.
On Tue, 2005-04-12 at 13:56 -0400, Jon Grosshart wrote:
>> They open not in Nuatilus, but whatever image program you specify.
>> Image viewing is no longer integrated with Nautilus like it has been
>> for years. I'm pretty sure EOG is meant to be the default handler for
Andrew Benton wrote:
> Jon Grosshart wrote:
>
>> gthumb should most definitely be included in the book before Eye Of
>> Gnome, seeing as how the developers intended gthumb to take over old
>> behavior.
>
> So do the images open in gthumb or Nautilus? For me nautilus
Jon Grosshart wrote:
>
>It's like I'm missing a key mime type
>or associated action with image files and I'm not sure why
>
>
>
Well, I figured out why. gthumb is meant to replace the 2.6 and below
image viewing behavior. As if 70 some odd packages aren
