Re: [blfs-support] AIGLX: Screen 0 is not DRI2 capable

2012-06-29 Thread Armin K.
On 06/29/2012 10:23 AM, Omar wrote: > Thanks Armin. > I've fixed the errors which you pointed. The following is the status now. > > >>> libGL: screen 0 does not appear to be DRI2 capable >>> libGL: OpenDriver: trying /usr/lib/dri/swrast_dri.so >>> libGL: Can't open configuration file /etc/dri

Re: [blfs-support] AIGLX: Screen 0 is not DRI2 capable

2012-06-29 Thread Armin K.
On 06/29/2012 12:44 PM, Ken Moffat wrote: > On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 10:29:41AM +0800, Omar wrote: >> Just attachment of this mail. >> > If you need to compress a large file to attach it, use a linux > compressor - 99% of people here cannot open rar files. In this > case, I don't think we need it

Re: [blfs-support] AIGLX: Screen 0 is not DRI2 capable

2012-06-28 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Armin K. wrote: > On 06/28/2012 09:17 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> I also get all of these with nouveau except the i945 line. >> > > Sure, you get nouveau or nouveau_vieux there, that line says which DRI > driver is loaded. I don't see that. I do see: (II) NOUVEAU(0): [DRI2] DRI driver: nouveau

Re: [blfs-support] AIGLX: Screen 0 is not DRI2 capable

2012-06-28 Thread Armin K.
On 06/28/2012 09:17 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > > I also get all of these with nouveau except the i945 line. > Sure, you get nouveau or nouveau_vieux there, that line says which DRI driver is loaded. > I'm not seeing swrast at all, but I am quite disappointed in the nouveau > performance. For glx

Re: [blfs-support] AIGLX: Screen 0 is not DRI2 capable

2012-06-28 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Armin K. wrote: > On 06/28/2012 06:13 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> IIRC R128 can do DRI. Sometimes the monitor isn't capable though. >> >> Looking at my recent work with the nouveau driver, the text 'rendering' >> is not mentioned in Xorg.0.log, although glxinfo does have "direct >> rendering: Yes".

Re: [blfs-support] AIGLX: Screen 0 is not DRI2 capable

2012-06-28 Thread Ken Moffat
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 12:51:22PM +0200, Armin K. wrote: > On 06/28/2012 11:26 AM, Omar wrote: > > Hi all, > > When checking DRI from /var/log/Xorg.0.log in section "Xorg-7.7-1 Testing > > and Configuration" I can't find messages like "(II) R128(0): Direct > > rendering enabled" and "(II) intel(

Re: [blfs-support] AIGLX: Screen 0 is not DRI2 capable

2012-06-28 Thread Armin K.
On 06/28/2012 06:13 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > > IIRC R128 can do DRI. Sometimes the monitor isn't capable though. > > Looking at my recent work with the nouveau driver, the text 'rendering' > is not mentioned in Xorg.0.log, although glxinfo does have "direct > rendering: Yes". > > -- Bruce > I

Re: [blfs-support] AIGLX: Screen 0 is not DRI2 capable

2012-06-28 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Armin K. wrote: > On 06/28/2012 11:26 AM, Omar wrote: >> Hi all, When checking DRI from /var/log/Xorg.0.log in section >> "Xorg-7.7-1 Testing and Configuration" I can't find messages like >> "(II) R128(0): Direct rendering enabled" and "(II) intel(0): direct >> rendering: DRI2 Enabled". The log jus

Re: [blfs-support] AIGLX: Screen 0 is not DRI2 capable

2012-06-28 Thread Armin K.
On 06/28/2012 11:26 AM, Omar wrote: > Hi all, > When checking DRI from /var/log/Xorg.0.log in section "Xorg-7.7-1 Testing and > Configuration" I can't find messages like "(II) R128(0): Direct rendering > enabled" and "(II) intel(0): direct rendering: DRI2 Enabled". The log just > tells me that >

[blfs-support] AIGLX: Screen 0 is not DRI2 capable

2012-06-28 Thread Omar
Hi all, When checking DRI from /var/log/Xorg.0.log in section "Xorg-7.7-1 Testing and Configuration" I can't find messages like "(II) R128(0): Direct rendering enabled" and "(II) intel(0): direct rendering: DRI2 Enabled". The log just tells me that " Load Module DRI2... Load Module DRI...