On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:32:47AM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
>
> For some reason I'm still not seeing any of Fernando's posts.
> Anybody else missing them ?
>
[sigh/] - turned out to be an addition in .procmailrc, and
unusually I wasn't sending the mail to my 'caughtspam' mbox - I was
trying to
Em 28-05-2013 04:58, baldu...@units.it escreveu:
>
> hello
>
>>
>> Please, anyone knows how safe or how to upgrade to or install side by
>> side python-2.7?
>>
First, I would like to thank Gabriele, Simon and Ken.
I followed Gabriele's first suggestion below:
prefix=/usr/local/python
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 08:14:43PM +1200, Simon Geard wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-05-27 at 18:41 -0300, Fernando wrote:
> > Now, python 2.6 is not enough:
> >
> > Creating Python environment
> > Python 2.7 or greater (but not Python 3) is required to build. You are
> > running Python 2.6.
> > *** Fix ab
On Mon, 2013-05-27 at 18:41 -0300, Fernando wrote:
> Now, python 2.6 is not enough:
>
> Creating Python environment
> Python 2.7 or greater (but not Python 3) is required to build. You are
> running Python 2.6.
> *** Fix above errors and then restart with "make -f
> client.mk build"
hello
>
> Please, anyone knows how safe or how to upgrade to or install side by
> side python-2.7?
>
I am using python-2.7 since quite a lot and do not see any problem; so I
would say that it is safe to upgrade (of course, this is my personal
experience: python is used by so many sw packages
Now, python 2.6 is not enough:
Creating Python environment
Python 2.7 or greater (but not Python 3) is required to build. You are
running Python 2.6.
*** Fix above errors and then restart with "make -f
client.mk build"
I think Ken does not recommend upgrading python.
Please, anyone
