On Tue, 2013-12-24 at 21:55 -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> And the user has the information to do that.
>
> "If you've decided to use the standard /usr prefix, you can omit the
> remainder of this page."
Sure... it's just that we make the complicated case the default one for
the inexperienced peopl
> Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2013 21:33:49 -0300
> From: Fernando de Oliveira
> To: BLFS Support List
> Subject: Re: [blfs-support] Xorg required dep when following links in BLFS
>
> Em 23-12-2013 08:13, Fernando de Oliveira escreveu:
.
.
> >
> > I t
Em 23-12-2013 08:13, Fernando de Oliveira escreveu:
> Em 23-12-2013 07:07, William Harrington escreveu:
>> Greetings,
>>
>> There is a problem with BLFS and Xorg deps when someone follows the
>> links for required dependencies of Xorg libs.
>>
>> An example:
>>
>> When a user attempts to build WI
On 12/24/2013 06:42 PM, Simon Geard wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-12-23 at 04:07 -0600, William Harrington wrote:
>> xorg-proto ( which has util-macros as required dependency) does not
>> have Xorg introduction as a required dependency where XORG_PREFIX and
>> XORG_CONFIG is set.
> Do we really have a rea
On Mon, 2013-12-23 at 13:13 -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Judging from LFS, many people skip things like the preface. I don't
> know how many times users have run into problems because they didn't
> read the preface and run the host requirements script.
Yeah, you could title that page "YOU MUST R
Simon Geard wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-12-23 at 04:07 -0600, William Harrington wrote:
>> xorg-proto ( which has util-macros as required dependency) does not
>> have Xorg introduction as a required dependency where XORG_PREFIX and
>> XORG_CONFIG is set.
>
> Do we really have a reason for having these va
On Mon, 2013-12-23 at 04:07 -0600, William Harrington wrote:
> xorg-proto ( which has util-macros as required dependency) does not
> have Xorg introduction as a required dependency where XORG_PREFIX and
> XORG_CONFIG is set.
Do we really have a reason for having these variables, instead of jus
Merell L. Matlock, Jr. wrote:
>
> On 12/23/2013 05:27 PM, William Harrington wrote:
>>
>> On Dec 23, 2013, at 1:13 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>>
>>> Judging from LFS, many people skip things like the preface. I don't
>>> know how many times users have run into problems because they didn't
>>> read the
Em 24-12-2013 11:56, Merell L. Matlock, Jr. escreveu:
>
> On 12/23/2013 05:27 PM, William Harrington wrote:
>>
>> On Dec 23, 2013, at 1:13 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>>
>>> Judging from LFS, many people skip things like the preface. I don't
>>> know how many times users have run into problems because
On 12/23/2013 05:27 PM, William Harrington wrote:
>
> On Dec 23, 2013, at 1:13 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
>> Judging from LFS, many people skip things like the preface. I don't
>> know how many times users have run into problems because they didn't
>> read the preface and run the host requirements
On Dec 23, 2013, at 1:13 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Judging from LFS, many people skip things like the preface. I don't
> know how many times users have run into problems because they didn't
> read the preface and run the host requirements script.
I also do note that in LFS, in places where the L
akhiezer wrote:
>> From: Bruce Dubbs
>>> Might it be best addressed in blfs chapter 2 or 3, if it's considered to
>>> be a 'global', 'overview' kind of issue? BLFS users are ~expected to have
>>> processed those chapters. That would help avoid a lot of repetition
>>> elsewhere?
>>
>> From a pract
Pierre Labastie wrote:
> ISTR that at a time, it was said that any page in the X chapter was a prereq
> for the following. That explains why the pages are not in alphabetical order.
> And that's how I implemented it in jhalfs-blfs (same for the KDE chapter,
> actually).
The Xorg pages are arrange
Le 23/12/2013 16:56, Bruce Dubbs a écrit :
> akhiezer wrote:
>>> From: William Harrington
>>> To: BLFS Support List
>>> Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2013 04:07:25 -0600
>>> Subject: [blfs-support] Xorg required dep when following links in BLFS
>>>
>>
On Dec 23, 2013, at 9:56 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Might it be best addressed in blfs chapter 2 or 3, if it's
>> considered to
>> be a 'global', 'overview' kind of issue? BLFS users are ~expected
>> to have
>> processed those chapters. That would help avoid a lot of repetition
>> elsewhere?
>
> Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2013 09:56:24 -0600
> From: Bruce Dubbs
> To: BLFS Support List
> Subject: Re: [blfs-support] Xorg required dep when following links in BLFS
>
> >>
.
.
> >
> >
> > Might it be best addressed in blfs chapter 2 or
akhiezer wrote:
>> From: William Harrington
>> To: BLFS Support List
>> Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2013 04:07:25 -0600
>> Subject: [blfs-support] Xorg required dep when following links in BLFS
>>
>> Greetings,
>>
>> There is a problem with BLFS and Xorg dep
> From: William Harrington
> To: BLFS Support List
> Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2013 04:07:25 -0600
> Subject: [blfs-support] Xorg required dep when following links in BLFS
>
> Greetings,
>
> There is a problem with BLFS and Xorg deps when someone follows the
> links for re
Em 23-12-2013 07:07, William Harrington escreveu:
> Greetings,
>
> There is a problem with BLFS and Xorg deps when someone follows the
> links for required dependencies of Xorg libs.
>
> An example:
>
> When a user attempts to build WIreshark, the require deps will take
> them all the way to
Greetings,
There is a problem with BLFS and Xorg deps when someone follows the
links for required dependencies of Xorg libs.
An example:
When a user attempts to build WIreshark, the require deps will take
them all the way to xorg-proto.
I have also been told that util-macros isn't required
20 matches
Mail list logo
