Archaic wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 09:44:24PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
>
>> A step on the way to tracking repeatable segfaults is to install gdb (a
>>straight configure, make, make install), then something like
>>
>>gdb firefox
>>at the prompt, 'run',
>>then when it segfaults 'bt' to get a b
Kristian Poul Herkild wrote:
Information on Install-Log can be found here:
http://install-log.sourceforge.net/
The whole discussion makes this sound like a great tool, especially for
a minimal Linux system like LFS. Does anyone know if there is an nALFS
profile that integrates install-log? I
Kristian Poul Herkild wrote:
Dan McGhee skrev:
Kristian, where can I find more info on install-log?
Thank you both for the help and the thought-provoking input.
Regards,
Dan
Hi Dan.
Information on Install-Log can be found here:
http://install-log.sourceforge.net/
Kind Regards,
Kristian
Thank you
Dan McGhee skrev:
Kristian, where can I find more info on install-log?
Thank you both for the help and the thought-provoking input.
Regards,
Dan
Hi Dan.
Information on Install-Log can be found here:
http://install-log.sourceforge.net/
Kind Regards,
Kristian
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/
The problem was apparently the way that fontconfig was installed. I
re-installed it as root, not a package-user, and both Thunderbird and
Firefox ran without a hitch. In fact, I'm in my new, shiny BLFS build now.
I would, however, like to continue the discussion about tracking
installed files
Dan McGhee wrote:
I don't know if you'd call this security or not, but the
un{,der}privileged users in this case are grand kids. I discovered the
hard way that little fingers can do great things to boxes of all sorts. :)
My experience with my kids has been that the power of root is a wonderful
On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 09:44:24PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
>
> A step on the way to tracking repeatable segfaults is to install gdb (a
> straight configure, make, make install), then something like
>
> gdb firefox
> at the prompt, 'run',
> then when it segfaults 'bt' to get a back trace
You kn
Kristian Poul Herkild wrote:
Randy McMurchy skrev:
Dan McGhee wrote these words on 04/29/05 14:55 CST:
There's a general synopsis of it in the "Package Management" section
of BLFS 6.0. and there's a complete run-down in the hint "More
Control and Mackage Management using Package Users."
T
Randy McMurchy skrev:
Dan McGhee wrote these words on 04/29/05 14:55 CST:
There's a general synopsis of it in the "Package Management" section of
BLFS 6.0. and there's a complete run-down in the hint "More Control and
Mackage Management using Package Users."
This is what I wanted to avoi
Randy McMurchy wrote:
Dan McGhee wrote these words on 04/29/05 14:55 CST:
For example, shadow wants to install
su, chage, chfn,chsh, expiry, gpasswd, newgrp and passwd as SUID. I
chose only su.
Bummer.
And just exactly how does the unprivileged user change his password?
Is it a security t
Dan McGhee wrote these words on 04/29/05 14:55 CST:
> For example, shadow wants to install
> su, chage, chfn,chsh, expiry, gpasswd, newgrp and passwd as SUID. I
> chose only su.
Bummer.
And just exactly how does the unprivileged user change his password?
Is it a security thing why you don't wa
Dan McGhee wrote these words on 04/29/05 14:55 CST:
> There's a general synopsis of it in the "Package Management" section of
> BLFS 6.0. and there's a complete run-down in the hint "More Control and
> Mackage Management using Package Users."
This is what I wanted to avoid. :-) I have no inter
On Fri, 29 Apr 2005, Dan McGhee wrote:
>
> Number one I don't know how to track down segmentations faults. The
> only thing that I can say here is that both applications built and
> installed without errors.
A step on the way to tracking repeatable segfaults is to install gdb (a
straight config
Randy McMurchy wrote:
Dan McGhee wrote these words on 04/29/05 13:53 CST:
Number one I don't know how to track down segmentations faults. The
only thing that I can say here is that both applications built and
installed without errors. Just to see if I could, since BLFS 6.0
doesn't indicate tha
Dan McGhee wrote these words on 04/29/05 13:53 CST:
> Number one I don't know how to track down segmentations faults. The
> only thing that I can say here is that both applications built and
> installed without errors. Just to see if I could, since BLFS 6.0
> doesn't indicate that X is a require
Obviously I'm trying to get Firefox and Thunderbird running. I'm using
Xorg and fluxbox. Each application throws a similar message when I try
to start it using xterm:
nsExtensionManager::disableObsoleteExtensions -failure, catching
extension so finalize window can close
/usr/lib/{thu
16 matches
Mail list logo