On Wed, 2006-06-07 at 09:24 -0600, Peter B. Steiger wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-06-07 at 22:45 +1200, Simon Geard wrote:
> > Out of curiosity, do you have similar problems with the various
> > calendaring functions?
>
> Absolutely - Any attempt to go into the calendar functions locks up all
> of Evolut
On Wed, 2006-06-07 at 22:45 +1200, Simon Geard wrote:
> Out of curiosity, do you have similar problems with the various
> calendaring functions?
Absolutely - Any attempt to go into the calendar functions locks up all
of Evolution, and I had to go to console and kill the process to regain
control
On Tue, 2006-06-06 at 09:02 -0600, Peter B. Steiger wrote:
> Now all the icons appear correctly, but yet again my contacts list is
> gone! I cleaned out my test user's entire /home directory so there
> would not be any previous config files in place, started up again so
> Gnome could build whateve
On 6/6/06, Peter B. Steiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Now all the icons appear correctly, but yet again my contacts list is
gone! I cleaned out my test user's entire /home directory so there
would not be any previous config files in place, started up again so
Gnome could build whatever it want
On Tue, 2006-06-06 at 22:27 +1200, Simon Geard wrote:
> I *have* had some issues with
> Evolution and contacts, but thought that to be a bug in Evo,
> particularly since it doesn't occur with 2.6 (i.e Gnome 2.14).
Funny you should mention that. I stayed up way too late last night
re-installing t
On Mon, 2006-06-05 at 14:00 -0600, Peter B. Steiger wrote:
> To make a long story short (too late!) what I finally realized after
> blowing the weekend on this project was that for whatever reason,
> Evolution (and possibly the Gnome panel) doesn't like having libexec
> processes in the /bin folder
On Mon, 2006-06-05 at 22:44 +0100, Andrew Benton wrote:
> There was a discussion about it and the decision was to put libexec
> files for PACKAGE in /usr/lib/$PACKAGE
> http://linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/blfs-dev/2005-October/011808.html
Domo arrigato! Glad to know I wasn't the only one trou
On 6/5/06, Andrew Benton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Peter B. Steiger wrote:
> Why did you (blfs authors) write the Gnome
> section so as to put the libexec functions in a separate directory
> (e.g., /usr/gnome/lib/gnome-applets, /usr/gnome/lib/bonobo, etc.) rather
> than just one big /usr/gnome/l
Peter B. Steiger wrote:
Why did you (blfs authors) write the Gnome
section so as to put the libexec functions in a separate directory
(e.g., /usr/gnome/lib/gnome-applets, /usr/gnome/lib/bonobo, etc.) rather
than just one big /usr/gnome/lib/libexec?
There was a discussion about it and the decis
Finally the light dawned last night. I have tried to upgrade Gnome to
2.1x several times over the past six months and each time ran into
missing icons or (the most frequent and annoying symptom) a broken
address book that won't show my existing entries or allow me to add new
ones.
Somehow a coupl
10 matches
Mail list logo
