On Fri, 2005-07-01 at 10:39 +0100, Declan Moriarty wrote:
> You are very kind to them. Between the old way and the new, even m$
> would have gone bust if they had tried that. The trouble is, the new
> way
> is going to be worse. They tried this with pcmcia support and
> succeeded
> in proving that
Recently, Somebody Somewhere wrote these words
> On Fri, 1 Jul 2005, Declan Moriarty wrote:
>
> > > Did the cursor work adequately on 2.6 in the past ?
> > >
> > Never. But I never used 2.6 much.
> >
> > > Which version of 2.6 are you now using, and which was your
> > > previous working version
On Fri, 1 Jul 2005, Declan Moriarty wrote:
> > Did the cursor work adequately on 2.6 in the past ?
> >
> Never. But I never used 2.6 much.
>
> > Which version of 2.6 are you now using, and which was your previous
> > working version ?
>
> 2.6.12.1.
>
> 2.6.0, 2.6.9, & 2.6.10 all showed the same
On Thu, 2005-06-30 at 19:13 +0200, Joern Abatz wrote:
> I think we are in the middle of a process. The old way was: A program talks
> to a device file, the kernel wakes up and loads the corresponding module.
> The new way is: Something, a boot script, loads a module, udev sees it and
> creates the
Recently, Somebody Somewhere wrote these words
> On Thu, 30 Jun 2005, Declan Moriarty wrote:
>
> >
> > I rebuilt the 2.4 and 2.6 kernels on LFS-5.0 here. Only a 1% change,
> > mainly in usb because the modules were barfing over hotplug.
> >
> > Spamd is now starting under the 2.4 kernel and all se
On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 04:00:13PM +0100, Declan Moriarty wrote:
>
> modprobe radeon got me a module which found the right type of card in
> the agp bus. That looked good.
Good.
> modprobe fbcon gave me: FATAL: Module fbcon not found.
It's 'Framebuffer Console support' in 'make menuconfig'.
>
On Thu, 30 Jun 2005, Declan Moriarty wrote:
>
> Which kind of tells me I didn't compile in a framebuffer at all.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/src/linux-2.6.12.1]# grep FRAMEBUFFER .config
> # CONFIG_FRAMEBUFFER_CONSOLE is not set
>
> but the radeon module loaded a module called fb. Same thing?
>
N
On Thu, 30 Jun 2005, Declan Moriarty wrote:
>
> I rebuilt the 2.4 and 2.6 kernels on LFS-5.0 here. Only a 1% change,
> mainly in usb because the modules were barfing over hotplug.
>
> Spamd is now starting under the 2.4 kernel and all seems well there.
> Loadkeys is running again under the 2.6 ker
Recently, Somebody Somewhere wrote these words
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 06:43:49PM +0100, Declan Moriarty wrote:
> >
> > Should I choose a 2.6 kernel, the loadkeys script doesn't start, and
> > I get this curious messing with no cursor.
>
This is infuriating
I rebuilt the 2.4 and 2.6 kern
On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 06:43:49PM +0100, Declan Moriarty wrote:
>
> Should I choose a 2.6 kernel, the loadkeys script doesn't start, and I
> get this curious messing with no cursor.
To me it smells like a framebuffer issue. Ok, here is (almost) all I know
about the framebuffer:
Try 'modprobe fb
10 matches
Mail list logo
