Re: Now OpenOffice-1.1.5 won't Build

2005-10-22 Thread Alan Lord
Dan McGhee wrote: I thought I was home free after I solved the compilation problem. Hah! Now building OpenOffice-1.1.5 failed with: ./unicode/locid.h:731: error: using typedef-name `icu_2_2::Locale::LocaleProxy' after `struct' This line originally read: 'friend struct Local

Now OpenOffice-1.1.5 won't Build

2005-10-22 Thread Dan McGhee
I thought I was home free after I solved the compilation problem. Hah! Now building OpenOffice-1.1.5 failed with: ./unicode/locid.h:731: error: using typedef-name `icu_2_2::Locale::LocaleProxy' after `struct' This line originally read: 'friend struct LocaleProxy Just as

Re: OpenOffice 1.1.5

2005-09-25 Thread Jeremy Byron
Chris Staub wrote: The test_bin_loc patch is no longer needed since lfs no longer moves test to /bin - http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/development/chapter06/coreutils.html. I've even created a bugzilla entry about this - http://blfs-bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1566.

Re: OpenOffice 1.1.5

2005-09-25 Thread Chris Staub
Jeremy Byron wrote: David Ciecierski wrote: A few things to get you started with OOo2.0b2.. I haven't had time to get very far with it yet. The test_bin_loc patch should still work, but only the last(?) entry is relevant in 2.0b2 - should just edit the file manually and make a new patc

Re: OpenOffice 2.0beta2 (was Re: OpenOffice 1.1.5)

2005-09-25 Thread David Ciecierski
Well, for what it's worth, attached are some patches to help get things started. Thanks a lot Jeremy; a pity I had TBird closed while going through OOo source & available patches... I'll go through them later and see if I missed something. OOs's compiling now, and since it's going to take sev

OpenOffice 2.0beta2 (was Re: OpenOffice 1.1.5)

2005-09-24 Thread Jeremy Byron
Well, for what it's worth, attached are some patches to help get things started. I've cleaned up what I could from the 1.1.4 patches (not including the gcc patch) but the java patch still needs work. Many sections from the java patch no longer exist in OOo2, but I used 'grep -lr' to scan the

Re: OpenOffice 1.1.5

2005-09-24 Thread Archaic
On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 06:58:27PM -0700, Jeremy Byron wrote: > > Not Archive::Zip, unless I just missed it.. Compress::Zlib, yes. Hrmm, so it is. Thanks for the clue. :) -- Archaic Want control, education, and security from your operating system? Hardened Linux From Scratch http://www.linuxfr

Re: OpenOffice 1.1.5

2005-09-24 Thread Jeremy Byron
Archaic wrote: On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 06:46:58PM -0700, Jeremy Byron wrote: Requires Perl Module: Archive::Zip.pm and it's dependency Compress::Zlib - http://bike-nomad.com/perl/ FYI: BLFS covers the download and installation of those modules. Not Archive::Zip, unless I just miss

Re: OpenOffice 1.1.5

2005-09-24 Thread Archaic
On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 06:46:58PM -0700, Jeremy Byron wrote: > > Requires Perl Module: Archive::Zip.pm and it's dependency Compress::Zlib > - http://bike-nomad.com/perl/ FYI: BLFS covers the download and installation of those modules. -- Archaic Want control, education, and security fr

Re: OpenOffice 1.1.5

2005-09-24 Thread Jeremy Byron
David Ciecierski wrote: Seriously, has anyone got any grips on building 1.1.5 or even 2.0 beta? I'm going to fiddle with 2.0 beta2 tonight, we'll see what happens :-) A few things to get you started with OOo2.0b2.. I haven't had time to get very far with it yet. Requires Perl Module: Ar

Re: OpenOffice 1.1.5

2005-09-24 Thread David Ciecierski
Seriously, has anyone got any grips on building 1.1.5 or even 2.0 beta? I'm going to fiddle with 2.0 beta2 tonight, we'll see what happens :-) -- David Ciecierski Want control, education, and security from your operating system? Hardened Linux From Scratch http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/hlfs

OpenOffice 1.1.5

2005-09-24 Thread Dan McGhee
Well, now that I'm ready to build OpenOffice, I see that both the stable and development versions of "the book" have the directions for 1.1.4. C'mon it's been ten whole days since the release. :-))) Seriously, has anyone got any grips on building 1.1.5 or even 2.0 beta? I'll be more than hap