On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 22:37 -0600, Peter B. Steiger wrote:
> OK, that makes sense. It also reminds me of my first Linux system,
> installed the week after I bought a new PC and had plenty of room to
> play with multiple boot partitions. I went right to redhat.com and
> downloaded the latest insta
On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 20:58 -0500, Randy McMurchy wrote:
> Since updating Glibc is usually not
> recommended, this means the original headers used on the system
> during the initial system build (when Glibc was built) should
> never be touched.
OK, that makes sense. It also reminds me of my first
Randy McMurchy wrote:
> The headers used to compile Glibc is what should stay on the
> system for the duration of the life of that build (providing
> Glibc isn't updated). Since updating Glibc is usually not
> recommended, this means the original headers used on the system
> during the initial sys
Peter B. Steiger wrote these words on 06/09/05 18:09 CST:
> It seems to me since the headers came from the kernel,
That's just it, the headers *don't* come from the kernel any
longer (there is a user-space kernel-headers package now),
however, that isn't the main reason.
> that if you install a
On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 15:28 -0500, Dan McGhee wrote:
> Thanks Hugo, Mike Hernandez and Ken Moffat. I'm responding to only one
> of these messages to save bandwidth. You all gave me the same "gotcha"
> about which I had no clue: Keep the old headers until I rebuild, the
> system dies or I die.
Hugo Bernier wrote:
On 6/9/05, Dan McGhee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I want to shift from 2.6.8.1, which was the initial LFS build to the
current SVN 2.6.11.10. In addition to the actual kernel and the
libc-headers, are there any "gotchas" to be aware of or any additional
things that I need
On 6/9/05, Dan McGhee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I want to shift from 2.6.8.1, which was the initial LFS build to the
> current SVN 2.6.11.10. In addition to the actual kernel and the
> libc-headers, are there any "gotchas" to be aware of or any additional
> things that I need to do?
I keep the
On Thu, 9 Jun 2005, Dan McGhee wrote:
> I want to shift from 2.6.8.1, which was the initial LFS build to the
> current SVN 2.6.11.10. In addition to the actual kernel and the
> libc-headers, are there any "gotchas" to be aware of or any additional
> things that I need to do?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Dan
>
I want to shift from 2.6.8.1, which was the initial LFS build to the
current SVN 2.6.11.10. In addition to the actual kernel and the
libc-headers, are there any "gotchas" to be aware of or any additional
things that I need to do?
Thanks,
Dan
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/bl