-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Simon Geard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 2006-01-23 at 09:12 -0500, Jonathan Murphy wrote:
> > Specifically freetype and fontconfig. I was unable to build either 6.9
> > or 7.0 with the current BLFS versions. This messed up my fonts,
> > so a
On Mon, 2006-01-23 at 09:12 -0500, Jonathan Murphy wrote:
> Specifically freetype and fontconfig. I was unable to build either 6.9
> or 7.0 with the current BLFS versions. This messed up my fonts,
> so after installing 6.9 I reinstalled the BLFS versions which sorted
> that out.
Messed up in what
Thomas Pegg wrote:
Dont' forget the broken kd.h file (from llh).
It's not really broken, it's done intentionally. Plus it's a header from
glibc not llh.
Yes, thanks for the correction. Do you know why this is done? Other
threads suggest the proper fix is just to undef _LINUX_TYPES_H aft
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andrew Benton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Jaap Struyk wrote:
> > Op ma 23-01-2006, om 15:12 schreef Jonathan Murphy:
> >
> >> I was unable to build either 6.9
> >> or 7.0 with the current BLFS versions. This messed up my fonts,
> > Is this a "stay a
Jaap Struyk wrote:
Op ma 23-01-2006, om 15:12 schreef Jonathan Murphy:
I was unable to build either 6.9
or 7.0 with the current BLFS versions. This messed up my fonts,
Is this a "stay away from newer xorgs"?
Or tar up a copy of the fonts from xorg-6.8.2. I don't like the fonts
from xorg-7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Well that's up to you. I found that in order to install X11R6.9 I had
to downgrade freetype and fontconfig. This messed up my fonts in some
applications, presumably because they were depending upon the more
recent versions. I have reinstalled Freetype
Op ma 23-01-2006, om 15:12 schreef Jonathan Murphy:
> I was unable to build either 6.9
> or 7.0 with the current BLFS versions. This messed up my fonts,
Is this a "stay away from newer xorgs"?
--
Groetjes Japie
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxf
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Other than the assorted weirdness reported earlier (which I'm pretty
sure is my fault and has no impact on the functionality of my system),
X11R6.9 (eventually) built without problems for me. I found the
following link useful:
http://dri.freedesktop.o
Op zo 22-01-2006, om 18:31 schreef Ken Moffat:
> The only difference in building is that you shoud add '#define
> BuildXterm YES' to host.def if you want to use xterms.
Sorry to interrupt but I tryed to build 6.9 and ran into:
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lrpcsvc
This didn't happen with 6.8.2
--
G
Thomas Pegg wrote:
Dont' forget the broken kd.h file (from llh).
It's not really broken, it's done intentionally. Plus it's a header from
glibc not llh.
Correction, it is provided by both glibc and llh, but the glibc version
seems to get used because it's included from other headers refer
Dont' forget the broken kd.h file (from llh).
It's not really broken, it's done intentionally. Plus it's a header from
glibc not llh.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Ken Moffat wrote:
On Fri, 20 Jan 2006, Brandin Creech wrote:
I'm tempted to go with 6.9.0, since I am under the impression that it is
identical to 7.0.0 except for the fact that 7.0.0 is modular (and thus,
presumably more difficult to compile). I was wondering if there are any
compatibility pro
On Fri, 20 Jan 2006, Brandin Creech wrote:
I'm tempted to go with 6.9.0, since I am under the impression that it is
identical to 7.0.0 except for the fact that 7.0.0 is modular (and thus,
presumably more difficult to compile). I was wondering if there are any
compatibility problems that I should
Hi, list.
I'm currently using X.org 6.8.2 per the BLFS SVN instructions, but I was
thinking about upgrading, especially since someone here reported that it had
better acceleration.
I'm tempted to go with 6.9.0, since I am under the impression that it is
identical to 7.0.0 except for the fact that
14 matches
Mail list logo