Re: invalid portmapper UID

2005-05-13 Thread S. Anthony Sequeira
On Fri, May 13, 2005 12:42, Ken Moffat said: > On Thu, 12 May 2005, Archaic wrote: > >> On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 06:21:18PM -0600, Jeremy Herbison wrote: >> > It appears portmapper is running as UID 1, which is like, totally >> not a >> > valid UID :) >> >> This make be a case of ps truncating the

Re: invalid portmapper UID

2005-05-13 Thread Ken Moffat
On Thu, 12 May 2005, Archaic wrote: > On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 06:21:18PM -0600, Jeremy Herbison wrote: > > It appears portmapper is running as UID 1, which is like, totally not a > > valid UID :) > > This make be a case of ps truncating the username if the username > exceeds 'n' characters. > >

Re: invalid portmapper UID

2005-05-12 Thread Archaic
On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 06:21:18PM -0600, Jeremy Herbison wrote: > It appears portmapper is running as UID 1, which is like, totally not a > valid UID :) This make be a case of ps truncating the username if the username exceeds 'n' characters. -- Archaic Want control, education, and security fr

invalid portmapper UID

2005-05-12 Thread Jeremy Herbison
It appears portmapper is running as UID 1, which is like, totally not a valid UID :) Can't for the life of me figure out why or how to fix it, and I don't want to add a bin user just for that one program. Wish I didn't need the stupid thing at all actually, but FAM requires it. How is it even ALLO