On Mon, 2006-05-29 at 13:24 +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
(after I said)
> > I wouldn't dare ignite a religious war by
> > asking what everyone's favorite minimalist WM is :-)
> >
> In that case, I won't tell you I prefer icewm ;)
Heh... fluxbox was just the ticket - I was able to retain the syntax
On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 11:53:42PM -0600, Peter B. Steiger wrote:
>
> It turns out it was blackbox, which was looking for the old X11R6
> libraries. I recompiled, but it's still not happy. So I guess it's time
> to look for a replacement... probably OpenBox so I won't have to learn
> new configur
Dan Nicholson wrote these words on 05/27/06 09:38 CST:
> Maybe you can use gcc-2 to drop that pesky net-tools patch. :)
> Seriously, any package that hasn't been fixed for gcc-4's stricter
> syntax by now is borderline unmaintained.
And what makes this difficult, is what constitutes "been fixed"
On 5/26/06, Peter B. Steiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Nope, I'm still sticking with gcc 3.x until 4.x no longer requires
patching the source (of target applications) to build stuff.
Maybe you can use gcc-2 to drop that pesky net-tools patch. :)
Seriously, any package that hasn't been fixed f
On Fri, 2006-05-26 at 23:53 -0600, Peter B. Steiger wrote:
> Nope, I'm still sticking with gcc 3.x until 4.x no longer requires
> patching the source (of target applications) to build stuff.
It's been long enough now that if a program is going to be updated, it
has been by now - anything that stil
On Thu, 2006-05-25 at 21:58 +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
> So, if by
> mischance you are using gcc-4.1.0 without the PR26763 patch, that is
> likely the cause of the problem.
Nope, I'm still sticking with gcc 3.x until 4.x no longer requires
patching the source (of target applications) to build stuff
On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 11:16:50AM -0600, Peter B. Steiger wrote:
> So I finished xorg server last night and ran the configuration and
> server test successfully, and all was well. Then I fired up startx; it
> initialized the graphics for a fraction of a second and returned back to
> the console.
So I finished xorg server last night and ran the configuration and
server test successfully, and all was well. Then I fired up startx; it
initialized the graphics for a fraction of a second and returned back to
the console.
startx invokes xinit, which dumps a bunch of progress messages from the
r
