me. I prefer that you
do this with a clear head though. Hope this helps and get well soon.
--
Chris Hallsworth
- Original Message -
From: "Margaret Thomas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2008 1:18 PM
Subject: Re: [Blind-Computing] Scanning with Avast?
>
chest, etc. Personally I've had little to no false
positives with Avast compared to AVG, which picked up trojans that even
Google's never heard of. Hope that helps.
--
Chris Hallsworth
- Original Message -
From: "Margaret Thomas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturda
lsworth
- Original Message -
From: "Margaret Thomas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2008 10:30 AM
Subject: Re: [Blind-Computing] Scanning with Avast?
> Chris,
>
>I hadn't performed disk maintenance in way too long and decided to do a
&g
ck short of a reinstall. I'll try and look into this. Hope that
helps.
--
Chris Hallsworth
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -----
From: "Margaret Thomas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2008 5:51 AM
Subject: [Blind-Comput
t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2008 5:51 AM
Subject: [Blind-Computing] Scanning with Avast?
> Hi All,
>
>I attempted my first scan with the free version of Avast yesterday and
> the thing drove me nuts.
>
>I thought I chose hard drive, test archives, a
It seems that my upstairs clock was off when I got up after losing
patience with Avast and let it do its thing and the total actual time was 8
hours and not 10. Avast claimed the scan ran for 51 minutes or so before I
stopped it after I got up and the percentage hadn't changed in 4 hours.
Hi All,
I attempted my first scan with the free version of Avast yesterday and
the thing drove me nuts.
I thought I chose hard drive, test archives, and thorough scan and in
over 10 hours of actual time only got to 17% and I think it found something
like 157 things. It seemed like eve
