Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: CSS @counter-style descriptor 'speak-as'

2021-09-17 Thread Xiaocheng Hu
On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 2:31 PM Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 1:36 PM Mike Taylor > wrote: > > On Friday, September 17, 2021 at 4:16:26 PM UTC-4 Xiaocheng Hu wrote: > >> Update since I2P: The 'spell-out' value is not implemented because it > is currently unimplementable

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: CSS @counter-style descriptor 'speak-as'

2021-09-17 Thread Tab Atkins Jr.
On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 1:36 PM Mike Taylor wrote: > On Friday, September 17, 2021 at 4:16:26 PM UTC-4 Xiaocheng Hu wrote: >> Update since I2P: The 'spell-out' value is not implemented because it is >> currently unimplementable (crbug.com/1247764). As the spec requires >> alphabetic counter

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: CSS @counter-style descriptor 'speak-as'

2021-09-17 Thread Mike Taylor
Hi Xiaocheng, On Friday, September 17, 2021 at 4:16:26 PM UTC-4 Xiaocheng Hu wrote: > Summary > > A custom counter style can be constructed with a meaning that is obvious > visually, but impossible to meaningfully represent via a speech synthesizer > or other non-visual means, or possible but

[blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS @counter-style descriptor 'speak-as'

2021-09-17 Thread Xiaocheng Hu
(Though the I2P thread already has 3 LGTMs, there are some updates. Hence requesting another review) Contact emailsxiaoche...@chromium.org Explainerhttps://drafts.csswg.org/css-counter-styles/#example-cce4b0db

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Prototype and Ship: Control character handling in cookies

2021-09-17 Thread Steven Bingler
Hi Ian and Yoav, I believe the general guidance now for warning users of some change is to use DevTools Issues rather than console warnings. Would using Issues, instead of console warnings, be acceptable to you? (This would be in addition to the reports.) Also, for posterity, it is possible

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Auto-expand details elements

2021-09-17 Thread Joey Arhar
> I think it's fair to say "positive", given the like and retweet signals on https://twitter.com/tomayac/status/1403119516922662913 and https://twitter.com/tomayac/status/1293696281370669057 where this behavior is described. Thanks Thomas! > Do I understand correctly and developers don't need to

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Prototype and Ship: Control character handling in cookies

2021-09-17 Thread Andrew Williams
Thanks for the feedback Mike, Yoav, and Ian. I will explore the feasibility of using CountDeprecation (or something similar) from the cookie-related code and will report back once I have an update on this. -Andrew On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 10:11 AM Ian Clelland wrote: > That looks right -- that

[blink-dev] PSA: Changes to Chrome’s WebSocket Server used in DevTools protocol to improve standard compliance

2021-09-17 Thread 'Shiho Noda' via blink-dev
Dear blink devs If you don’t use the DevTools protocol, you can ignore this. This server is only used in headless or remote-control scenarios, and is not part of the web platform. DevTools uses Chrome internal WebSocket implementation. The previous implementation was not compliant with the

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Disable propagation of body style to viewport when contained

2021-09-17 Thread Mike Taylor
On Wednesday, September 15, 2021 at 4:23:13 PM UTC-4 Rune Lillesveen wrote: > On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 2:55 PM Mike Taylor > wrote: > >> Hey Rune, >> >> Is there any way for developers to know behavior has changed on their >> sites when this ships? (Or alternatively, any clues for folks

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate: The "basic-card" method of PaymentRequest API

2021-09-17 Thread Mike West
Technically, yes. Deprecation warnings should only land when we're _actually_ going to deprecate a thing, and have a reasonable schedule to point to. Here, though, I think we have agreement that the deprecation itself is reasonable, and agreement on a schedule. We're only blocking on

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Auto-expand details elements

2021-09-17 Thread Yoav Weiss
On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 8:41 AM 'Thomas Steiner' via blink-dev < blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: > > > On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 3:56 AM Joey Arhar wrote: > >> Contact emailsjar...@chromium.org >> >> Explainer >>

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Progressive Web Apps as URL Handlers

2021-09-17 Thread 'Thomas Steiner' via blink-dev
Article updated accordingly: https://web.dev/pwa-url-handler/#register-for-ot On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 12:04 AM 'Lu Huang' via blink-dev < blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: > Origin Trial now active at: > https://developer.chrome.com/origintrials/#/view_trial/-5376172055173529599 > > On Thursday,

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Auto-expand details elements

2021-09-17 Thread 'Thomas Steiner' via blink-dev
On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 3:56 AM Joey Arhar wrote: > Contact emailsjar...@chromium.org > > Explainer > https://github.com/WICG/display-locking/blob/main/explainers/auto-expanding-details-explainer.md > > Specificationhttps://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/6466 > > Design docs >