[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Prototype and Ship: font-palette and custom @font-palette-values palettes

Thanks for working on this! Seems like a very cool feature!! :) On Tuesday, March 8, 2022 at 1:44:55 PM UTC+1 Dominik Röttsches wrote: > (re-sending from @chromium.org account) > > Contact emailsdr...@chromium.org > rshee...@google.com > > Specificationhttps://www.w3.org/TR/css-fonts-4/#propdef-f

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Capture handle

On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 11:26 AM 'Elad Alon' via blink-dev < blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: > Contact emailselada...@chromium.org > > Explainer > https://github.com/w3c/mediacapture-handle/blob/main/identity/README.md > > Specificationhttps://w3c.github.io/mediacapture-handle/identity/ > > Summary

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Implement and Ship: CSS Values Level 4 Calc Simplification and Serialization

LGTM2 On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 5:43 AM 박중헌 wrote: > Yes, they are the right wpts. Besides, many other wpts' serialization > results are affected to be in spec-compliant form > so they are changed to be green too. > E.g. > wpt/css/css-shapes/shape-outside/values/shape-margin-003.html > wpt/css/css

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Implement and Ship: CSS Values Level 4 Calc Simplification and Serialization

Yes, they are the right wpts. Besides, many other wpts' serialization results are affected to be in spec-compliant form so they are changed to be green too. E.g. wpt/css/css-shapes/shape-outside/values/shape-margin-003.html wpt/css/css-shapes/shape-outside/values/shape-outside-ellipse-011.html wpt/

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Implement and Ship: CSS Values Level 4 Calc Simplification and Serialization

Thanks. LGTM1 (Aside: Are these are the right WPTs ? I'm excited for them to all be green if so). On 3/9/22 6:14 PM, 박중헌 wrote: Ok, I updated the links below and the chrome status entry.

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Origin Isolation By Default / Deprecate document.domain

Just chiming in to say that Cypress apparently relies on setting document.domain for its "test across the same-site" feature. https://docs.cypress.io/guides/references/trade-offs#Same-origin Might need either some outreach, or an alternative for them via the Chrome debugging protocol. ☆*PhistucK*

[blink-dev] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Intent to Prototype: Confirmation of Action API

Hi David, Responses inline 🙂. I've also linked the design doc if you'd like to take a further look: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1pz7KQUgd3zjjH7aTWFTFBEps_GrxXF3pZjaV8H76WjA/edit?usp=sharing Cheers, Sara From: David Tseng Sent: Monday, March 7, 2022 4:44

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Implement and Ship: CSS Values Level 4 Calc Simplification and Serialization

Ok, I updated the links below and the chrome status entry. Contact emailspjh0...@gmail.com, jh718.p...@samsung.com ExplainerNone Specificationhttps://drafts.csswg.org/css-values-4/#calc-simplification, https://drafts.csswg.org/css-values-4/#calc-serialize Summary CSS math functions are simplif

[blink-dev] Re: Features check with new version release

How do you "monitor"? I'm not aware of any cases where a feature made it into a Dev/Beta release without being in Canary first. (That said, it's *possible *to cherry-pick features from Canary *into *Dev/Beta releases after they were forked out of Canary). Things are slightly complicated by the

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Remove: Legacy Client Hint Mode

I haven't had issues loading those sites on Firefox mobile (which doesn't have client hints), but haven't specifically tried loading them on Chrome Android w/o hints enabled. It's true that we're betting on lower dependency given this change only affects Chrome on Android (where the default delegat

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Add Save Data Client Hint

Sorry for not including timeline info. The plan is: M102 will include the new Sec-CH-Save-Data header. No plan to remove the legacy Save-Data header at this moment. On Mon, Mar 7, 2022 at 7:57 AM Ari Chivukula wrote: > Fixing the subject prefix, apologies. > > On Mon, Mar 7, 2022 at 7:55 AM Ari

[blink-dev] Ready for Trial: Increased max nesting level for setTimeout(0)

Contact emailsetien...@chromium.org Specification https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/timers-and-user-prompts.html Design docs https://docs.google.com/document/d/1boT0k8BQjl7mXXzvI9SdN4XJPSza27vE8T0CNxmMhCI Summary Increase the nesting threshold before which setTimeout(..., <4ms) start being

[blink-dev] PSA: Updating Chrome's Structured-Fields implementation to match RFC8941

tl;dr: Chrome will start accepting TAB characters as separators in some headers. You almost certainly don't need to do anything. Long version: Now that it has been published as an official RFC (RFC8941 ), I'm in the process of updating Chrome's Struct

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Implement and Ship: CSS Values Level 4 Calc Simplification and Serialization

On 3/9/22 11:00 AM, 박중헌 wrote: Contact emails pjh0...@gmail.com, jh718.p...@samsung.com Explainer None Specification https://drafts.csswg.org/css-values-4/#calc-simplification, https://drafts.csswg.org/css-values-4/#calc-serializ

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Implement and Ship: CSS Values Level 4 Calc Simplification and Serialization

What I mentioned above is just a bug aspect, so I'd like to add more comment. The web exposed serialization result will be the one resulted from css simplification. As an example of behavioral change of css calc simplification, it includes length canonicalization e.g. calc((12.5%*6 + 10in) / 4) is

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Implement and Ship: CSS Values Level 4 Calc Simplification and Serialization

I think web exposed visible change will be calc serialized result, e.g. calc(20% + 10px + 10em - 10%) will be serialized to calc(10% + 10em + 10px) while it is serialized to calc((20% + 10px + 10em) - 10%) with current implementation. FYI, current change link is https://chromium-review.googlesourc

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Implement and Ship: CSS Values Level 4 Calc Simplification and Serialization

What are the web exposed implications of this? Does this change the result of calcs in any way, or is it just speeding them up? On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 5:00 PM 박중헌 wrote: > Contact emailspjh0...@gmail.com, jh718.p...@samsung.com > > ExplainerNone > > Specificationhttps://drafts.csswg.org/css-valu

[blink-dev] Intent to Implement and Ship: CSS Values Level 4 Calc Simplification and Serialization

Contact emailspjh0...@gmail.com, jh718.p...@samsung.com ExplainerNone Specificationhttps://drafts.csswg.org/css-values-4/#calc-simplification, https://drafts.csswg.org/css-values-4/#calc-serialize Summary CSS math functions are simplified and serialized per spec. CSS calc simplification is a ki

[blink-dev] Features check with new version release

Hi Team, Our teams monitors chrome version releases to find any issues earlier. Can you let us know if we can monitor the canary releases or is it required to monitor till beta release as we see new features are added or removed till dev and beta stage ? Thanks Arun -- You received this mess

[blink-dev] Intent to Prototype + Ship: Secure Payment Confirmation API V3

Contact emails nbur...@chromium.org, rous...@chromium.org, smcgr...@chromium.org, ma...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/w3c/secure-payment-confirmation/blob/main/explainer.md Specification https://w3c.github.io/secure-payment-confirmation/ Design docs N/A Summary Three changes to

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Remove: Legacy Client Hint Mode

How can we get a good grip on the web compatibility of this change? The use counters are a high, but as you point out, the number of sites that actually depend on the legacy client hints is lower. The question is just "how much lower?". You listed a number of affected sites. Has anyone checked

[blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Capture handle

Contact emailselada...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/w3c/mediacapture-handle/blob/main/identity/README.md Specificationhttps://w3c.github.io/mediacapture-handle/identity/ Summary We introduce a mechanism that allows an application to opt-in to exposing certain information to other a