[blink-dev] Intent to Prototype: WebAuthn remote desktop support

Contact emailsmarti...@google.com Explainer https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/wiki/Explainer:-Remote-Desktop-Support Specificationhttps://w3c.github.io/webauthn/ Summary Allow remote desktop clients to execute WebAuthn requests on behalf of another origin so that users browsing on a remote

[blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Viewport-height client hint

Contact emails curran...@chromium.org, ryanst...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/WICG/responsive-image-client-hints/blob/master/Viewport-Height-Explainer.md Specification https://wicg.github.io/responsive-image-client-hints/#sec-ch-viewport-height Summary Currently, Responsive

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype: Add .avif to permitted Web Share file extensions

MDN documents the supported file types ( https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Navigator/share#shareable_file_types). If AVIF gets added (which, as a user, I would love), the support table on MDN should be updated accordingly. Thanks, Tom -- You received this message because you are

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Private Network Access preflight requests for subresources

Hi all, Thanks for the timely question, I was about to send an update here. We have fixed nearly all of the blockers identified in the above doc. The only outstanding issue is the aforementioned crash, which required a bit more design work than the rest. That work has been completed and CLs to

[blink-dev] Intent to Prototype: Add .avif to permitted Web Share file extensions

Contact emailsbluewhale.m...@gmail.com, ericwillig...@chromium.org Explainerhttps://github.com/w3c/web-share/blob/master/docs/explainer.md Specification Summary The .avif image file should be able to be shared by Web Share. Adding avif to the other allowed image file types will help spread the

[blink-dev] Are you interested in hosting a talk at BlinkOn 16? Sign up now!

Bcc: blink-dev@ and BlinkOn 16 attendees TLDR: We're now accepting breakout talk sign ups through Wednesday, May 4th and lightning talk sign ups

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Experiment: Network State Partitioning (again)

LGTM to experiment M101-M102 On Monday, April 4, 2022 at 7:46:03 PM UTC+2 Mike Taylor wrote: > > > > > > > > > > * Contact emails brgoldst...@chromium.org , > miketa...@chromium.org , mme...@chromium.org > Summary We would like to run another experiment for > the Network State Partitioning

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Private Network Access preflight requests for subresources

Hello, is there now an updated timeline to roll out this change? Will the trial restart in Chrome 102 or a later version? On Wednesday, March 2, 2022 at 6:36:21 PM UTC+8 Titouan Rigoudy wrote: > Hi all, > > Here's the promised doc: >

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Add Save Data Client Hint

LGTM3 /Daniel On 2022-03-30 18:03, Chris Harrelson wrote: LGTM2. Save-Data is already shipped (for a long time), and this seems like a step in the right direction, without introducing a new header. On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 5:49 AM Mike West wrote: LGTM1. This approach seems like a

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Experiment (2nd): Same-origin prerendering triggered by the speculation rules API

Thank you! On Wed, Apr 6, 2022 at 11:55 PM Yoav Weiss wrote: > LGTM to extend the experimentation to M102, given the API changes with > regards to the BroadcastChannel. > Please note that this experiment is reaching the typical time limits of > OTs, and experimentation beyond that would require

[blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Cookie Expires/Max-Age attribute upper limit

Contact emails aric...@chromium.org, miketa...@chromium.org Specification https://httpwg.org/http-extensions/draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis.html#name-the-expires-attribute Summary When cookies are set with an explicit Expires/Max-Age attribute the value will now be capped to no more than 400

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Experiment (2nd): Same-origin prerendering triggered by the speculation rules API

LGTM to extend the experimentation to M102, given the API changes with regards to the BroadcastChannel. Please note that this experiment is reaching the typical time limits of OTs, and experimentation beyond that would require significant justification and 3 LGTMs. On Wed, Apr 6, 2022 at 4:48 PM

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Experiment (2nd): Same-origin prerendering triggered by the speculation rules API

Hi Yoav, The requested timeline is from M101 to M102. The current timeline is from M94 to M100, and the experiment is still running On Wed, Apr 6, 2022 at 11:39 PM Yoav Weiss wrote: > What's the requested timeline for experimentation? Is the experiment > currently still running? > > On Mon,

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Experiment (2nd): Same-origin prerendering triggered by the speculation rules API

What's the requested timeline for experimentation? Is the experiment currently still running? On Mon, Apr 4, 2022 at 4:42 PM Hiroki Nakagawa wrote: > Contact emails > > nhir...@chromium.org, navigation-...@chromium.org > > Explainer > > This feature: >