[blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Speculation Rules (Prefetch)

Contact emails jbro...@chromium.org, kenjibah...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/WICG/nav-speculation/blob/main/triggers.md Specification https://wicg.github.io/nav-speculation/speculation-rules.html https://wicg.github.io/nav-speculation/prefetch.html Summary Flexible syntax for

[blink-dev] Don't forget to sign up to host a talk at BlinkOn 16!

Bcc: blink-dev@ and BlinkOn 16 attendees Hi everyone, TLDR: We're still accepting lightning talk sign ups until *next* Wednesday, April 20th and breakout talk sign ups

[blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate and Remove: Deprecate element's functionality

Contact emailsmas...@chromium.org Explainerhttps://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/7816 https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/6003 Specificationhttps://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/7816 Summary The element can be used to specify parameters such as a URL (via params named "movie", "src", "code",

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Local Fonts Access API

On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 6:36 AM Yoav Weiss wrote: > Also, any learnings/feedback from the Origin Trial? > > Not distinct from the dev trial (i.e. developers trying the API behind a flag). There was a feature request for additional metadata which was implemented, then the request was withdrawn so

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Cookie Expires/Max-Age attribute upper limit

The good news is sites can continue to use max-age to reset the expiration 400 days in the future, every time the user visits (assuming that's desired behavior), for example in JS: document.cookie = `lol=ok; max-age=${60 * 60 * 24 * 400}`; We'll work with DevRel to make sure this is properly

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Cookie Expires/Max-Age attribute upper limit

LGTM3 I am slightly concerned with cookies used daily unexpectedly disappearing every 400 days. If there was a way to refresh them when used, maybe that would make this smoother for web developers, but that is a followup feature. If the metrics show that it is a common scenario. /Daniel On

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Media Queries Level 4 Syntax & Evaluation

Bonus LGTM4 (Mike just beat me before I hit send). On 4/13/22 8:23 AM, Yoav Weiss wrote: LGTM2 Since the Yandex scripts are metrics scripts, there's little chance that their use would result in breakage, and the script is most likely doing some sort of "browser fingerprinting" and trying to

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Media Queries Level 4 Syntax & Evaluation

LGTM3. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "blink-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org. To view this discussion on the web visit

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Cookie Expires/Max-Age attribute upper limit

LGTM2. I recognize Yoav's concern, and I think it's reasonable, but I'm less concerned about it than he is. Still, adding the metrics under discussion here is a good step, and if they cause us to reevaluate the impact, we'll have plenty of time to do so. -mike On Wednesday, April 13, 2022 at

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Local Fonts Access API

Also, any learnings/feedback from the Origin Trial? On Wednesday, April 13, 2022 at 3:35:02 PM UTC+2 Yoav Weiss wrote: > On Friday, April 8, 2022 at 8:15:42 PM UTC+2 Ajay Rahatekar wrote: > >> Contact emails >> >> ds...@chromium.org, jsb...@chromium.org >> >> Explainer >> >>

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Media Queries Level 4 Syntax & Evaluation

LGTM2 Since the Yandex scripts are metrics scripts, there's little chance that their use would result in breakage, and the script is most likely doing some sort of "browser fingerprinting" and trying to see if the browser is indeed the one it claims to be. As such, I think that the risk here is

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Media Queries Level 4 Syntax & Evaluation

Yoav asked if I could do another HTTP Archive query to look for sites that hit the counters, contain "not all" and contain at least one media feature that's known to be unsupported in Chrome. The idea would be to then look at what those sites do, check if they break, etc. Looking at a relevant

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Media Queries Level 4 Syntax & Evaluation

LGTM1, with a careful launch (as usual, but even more so). The usage counter indicates that the ceiling of breakage is quite high (in the 0.1% magnitude range) but I believe that your analysis of is likely accurate and the real amount of affected sites is likely to be much lower. Furthermore,

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Cookie Expires/Max-Age attribute upper limit

On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 9:10 PM Ari Chivukula wrote: > Deal, but let's call metrics for M103 and the feature in M104. > Sure, I should've said N and N+1 > ~ Ari Chivukula (Their/There/They're) > > > On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 8:57 PM Yoav Weiss wrote: > >> LGTM1 conditional on: >> >>-

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Subresource Loading with Web Bundles

Thanks for the clarification. Yeah, I think it's up-to each browser, however, it is worth clarifying that extensions in chrome are able to see and operate on subresources in Web Bundles. See https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1155402 for details. On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 5:18

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Subresource Loading with Web Bundles

A quick clarification ✔️ to avoid confusion  or needless agitation 掠: On Wednesday, April 13, 2022 at 12:43:24 PM UTC+9 Hayato Ito wrote: > Contact emails:hay...@chromium.org, denom...@chromium.org > > > Explainer: > > >