Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Same-origin prerendering triggered by the speculation rules API

LGTM1 Thanks for the extra details. These results look amazing, so in my mind they significantly outweigh the risk of going first here. On Thursday, May 12, 2022 at 4:12:19 AM UTC+2 Hiroki Nakagawa wrote: > Let me share more details of the feedback. > > We worked directly with 11 external partn

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Prototype: [WebRTC] Deprecate and Remove mediaConstraint's googIPv6

Pinging this again. In two weeks I need to write what's in 103 beta on https://blog.chromium.org (https://blog.chromium.org/search/label/beta). Will deprecation be in 103? On Tuesday, May 10, 2022 at 12:27:49 PM UTC-7 jmedley via Chromestatus wrote: > In which version are you hoping to depreca

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype + Ship: User Activation Requirement for SPC Credential Enrollment

Nick, When are you hoping to ship? Joe Joe Medley | Technical Writer, Chrome DevRel | jmed...@google.com | 816-678-7195 *If an API's not documented it doesn't exist.* On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 11:48 PM Yoav Weiss wrote: > LGTM3 > > On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 7:27 AM Mike West wrote: > >> LGTM2.

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype + Ship: User Activation Requirement for SPC Credential Enrollment

Thanks all! Joe, this change has now landed in M103. On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 11:04 AM Joe Medley wrote: > Nick, > > When are you hoping to ship? > > Joe > Joe Medley | Technical Writer, Chrome DevRel | jmed...@google.com | > 816-678-7195 <(816)%20678-7195> > *If an API's not documented it doesn'

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype + Ship: User Activation Requirement for SPC Credential Enrollment

Thanks. Joe Medley | Technical Writer, Chrome DevRel | jmed...@google.com | 816-678-7195 *If an API's not documented it doesn't exist.* On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 8:12 AM Nick Burris wrote: > Thanks all! Joe, this change has now landed in M103. > > On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 11:04 AM Joe Medley wro

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Same-origin prerendering triggered by the speculation rules API

LGTM2 /Daniel On 2022-05-12 10:40, Yoav Weiss wrote: LGTM1 Thanks for the extra details. These results look amazing, so in my mind they significantly outweigh the risk of going first here. On Thursday, May 12, 2022 at 4:12:19 AM UTC+2 Hiroki Nakagawa wrote: Let me share more details of

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Speculation Rules (Prefetch)

LGTM1 /Daniel On 2022-05-11 09:44, Yoav Weiss wrote: On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 8:40 PM Jeremy Roman wrote: On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 8:41 AM Yoav Weiss wrote: On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 12:36 AM Jeremy Roman wrote: Contact emails jbr

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Speculation Rules (Prefetch)

LGTM2 On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 6:26 PM Daniel Bratell wrote: > LGTM1 > > /Daniel > > > On 2022-05-11 09:44, Yoav Weiss wrote: > > > > On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 8:40 PM Jeremy Roman wrote: > >> On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 8:41 AM Yoav Weiss >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 12:36 AM Je

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype and Ship: Multi-Screen Window Placement: Fullscreen Companion Window

Hey Thomas, We don't necessarily need to change the web.dev article at this point, but following up to explore API progress and related enhancements (e.g. Fullscreen Capability Delegation ) might be valuable to developers. Let's s

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Reverse Origin Trial for WebRTC's Plan B SDP semantics

Hi Henrik, Yes. We have an big issue on fixing the problem to run without this trial, which will cause our end users not be able to make video call to call center for banking service. We are still working on fixing the problem. However, we cannot make it before May 25th. Is there any alternati

[blink-dev] Is end date of “Trial for RTCPeerConnection Plan B SDP Semantics” could be postpone?

Hi: we had an system still use plan B solution, is any chance or solution postpone plan B ? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "blink-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to blink-dev+unsubsc

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Speculation Rules (Prefetch)

LGTM3 On 5/12/22 12:29 PM, Yoav Weiss wrote: LGTM2 On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 6:26 PM Daniel Bratell wrote: LGTM1 /Daniel On 2022-05-11 09:44, Yoav Weiss wrote: On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 8:40 PM Jeremy Roman wrote: On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 8:41 AM Yoav Weiss

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Same-origin prerendering triggered by the speculation rules API

LGTM3 On 5/12/22 12:23 PM, Daniel Bratell wrote: LGTM2 /Daniel On 2022-05-12 10:40, Yoav Weiss wrote: LGTM1 Thanks for the extra details. These results look amazing, so in my mind they significantly outweigh the risk of going first here. On Thursday, May 12, 2022 at 4:12:19 AM UTC+2 Hiro

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Prototype: [WebRTC] Deprecate and Remove mediaConstraint's googIPv6

(not the implementor) According to followup to the request, the deprecation message is already in 102, possibly without ever having been documented. I don't know if you want to mention it in 103 instead. The removal we approved is for 108. /Daniel On 2022-05-12 16:59, 'Joe Medley' via blink-

[blink-dev] Re: Scope of FLEDGE OT

Hi, 1. Chrome origin trials are available globally which also applies to FLEDGE. 2. We recently announced plans to ramp up the OT to 50% of Chrome Beta. Please feel free view the

[blink-dev] Intent to Prototype: Permissions-Policy: unload

Contact emails fer...@chromium.com, bfcache-dev Explainer https://github.com/fergald/docs/blob/master/explainers/permissions-policy-unload.md Specification https://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/7915 Summary This feature allows pages to disable the running of unload event handlers. The goal is