Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: removing the five-minute rule for

On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 7:19 PM Yoav Weiss wrote: > LGTM2 to launch this as a Finch experiment. > > On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 5:55 PM Rick Byers wrote: > >> LGTM1 from an API owners perspective. It's arguable whether this is >> "web-exposed" at all, or just a browser performance heuristic you're >

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate and Remove: data: URL in SVGUseElement

Thank you Rick for the detailed explanation! On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 10:30 AM Rick Byers wrote: > Eliminating this makes sense to me given the security benefit. Thank you > for pushing it! But it does seem somewhat risky from a web compat > perspective. 0.005% is above our "small but non-trivial

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate and Remove: data: URL in SVGUseElement

Eliminating this makes sense to me given the security benefit. Thank you for pushing it! But it does seem somewhat risky from a web compat perspective. 0.005% is above our "small but non-trivial risk

Re: [blink-dev]

Some hints inline... ☆*PhistucK* On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 5:54 PM Abdussalam Mazhar wrote: > Dear Team, > > I am a I.T security professional, my question is that: > > 1. How chrome identifies HTML.? > Either by the MIME type (the Content-Type HTTP header) or, quite vaguely, by looking at the c

[blink-dev]

Dear Team, I am a I.T security professional, my question is that: 1. How chrome identifies HTML.? 2. How chrome assign tags? how it differentiate between: "<" and "<" ? 3. Is there any dictionary in browser to identify tags? Looking forward to hearing from you. Regards, Abdussalam Mazhar --

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: String.prototype.isWellFormed and toWellFormed

LGTM1 On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 8:16 PM 'Shu-yu Guo' via blink-dev < blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: > Contact emails...@chromium.org > > Explainer > https://github.com/tc39/proposal-is-usv-string/blob/main/README.md > > Specificationhttps://tc39.es/proposal-is-usv-string > > Summary > > Add two Str

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS Selectors 4 Pseudo-Class :nth-child(an + b of S)

LGTM2 On 1/13/23 12:04 PM, Rick Byers wrote: LGTM1 On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 2:04 PM Mike Taylor wrote: On 1/12/23 1:24 PM, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: > On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 01:09:41PM -0500, Mike Taylor wrote: >>> Gecko: In development >> Do you have a link? > https:/

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: removing the five-minute rule for

LGTM2 to launch this as a Finch experiment. On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 5:55 PM Rick Byers wrote: > LGTM1 from an API owners perspective. It's arguable whether this is > "web-exposed" at all, or just a browser performance heuristic you're > tweaking. > > From a performance perspective, your argument

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS Selectors 4 Pseudo-Class :nth-child(an + b of S)

LGTM1 On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 2:04 PM Mike Taylor wrote: > On 1/12/23 1:24 PM, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 01:09:41PM -0500, Mike Taylor wrote: > >>> Gecko: In development > >> Do you have a link? > > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1808227 > Thank you -

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: removing the five-minute rule for

LGTM1 from an API owners perspective. It's arguable whether this is "web-exposed" at all, or just a browser performance heuristic you're tweaking. >From a performance perspective, your argument and UMA analysis is compelling to me. But I've learned the hard way not to trust predictions of performa

Re: [blink-dev] Re: List decorators on Chrome Status

It's not just for V8 features, but all features. There won't be an entry on Chrome Status until someone is actually working on it. Joe Medley | Technical Writer, Chrome DevRel | jmed...@google.com | 816-678-7195 *If an API's not documented it doesn't exist.* On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 3:28 PM Joe P

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Origin Isolation By Default / Deprecate document.domain on stable

Thanks for the update Daniel, good luck! In case others, like me, have missed or forgotten the long history of this difficult deprecation and what it means for web developers, this blog post is a good summary . One critical thing it doe

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS Root Font Units: 'rex', 'rch', 'ric', 'rlh'

LGTM3 On 1/13/23 10:28 AM, Rick Byers wrote: LGTM2 On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 10:12 AM Philip Jägenstedt wrote: I see, thanks for checking that! It’s worth checking that our test results match other browsers who have implemented, in case they can reveal different choices or interpr

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS Root Font Units: 'rex', 'rch', 'ric', 'rlh'

LGTM2 On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 10:12 AM Philip Jägenstedt wrote: > I see, thanks for checking that! It’s worth checking that our test results > match other browsers who have implemented, in case they can reveal > different choices or interpretations of the spec. > > LGTM1 > > On Thu, 12 Jan 2023

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS Root Font Units: 'rex', 'rch', 'ric', 'rlh'

I see, thanks for checking that! It’s worth checking that our test results match other browsers who have implemented, in case they can reveal different choices or interpretations of the spec. LGTM1 On Thu, 12 Jan 2023 at 16:54 Daniil Sakhapov wrote: > Safari has claimed to implement rlh, but no

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Origin Isolation By Default / Deprecate document.domain on stable

Hello all, We've now handled the bugs we've discovered, and I would like to make another attempt at launching. I'll follow the plan that was approved here, but two milestones later: Launch to 50% beta in M111 (or late M110, if I can still catch a bit of that release cycle), and then ramp on stable

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Selectors Level 4: :is() and :where()

For the legacy `:-webkit-any()` selector, the `` feature is also supported in Safari and Firefox, Chrome does not seem to support it, which has some interoperability differences. [image: FA484CFD-1D83-4AAD-81D2-22647E440C76.png] 在2020年10月22日星期四 UTC+8 01:52:04 写道： > On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 2:31