[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Prototype: Conservative page freezing on desktop

We are categorically against this. It severely limits developers to what is considered to be "good practice" which is not always desired (or possible), especially not in complex environments. We are frankly getting tired to be told what is "good" and what is "bad" behavior without any considerat

[blink-dev] PSA: WebDriver changes now go through the API owners intent process

TL;DR: going forward, new WebDriver Classic and WebDriver BiDi APIs in Chromium need to go through the Intent process, including in particular Intent to Prototype and Intent to Ship. See here for a m

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: timestamp field on RTCEncodedVideoFrameMetadata

Hi Tony, Please make a chromestatus.com entry for this change, we need them for all changes to the platform, so they can be tracked in release notes and elsewhere. (And as Yoav mentioned, it's why this intent was missed during our API owners triage process.) As for signals: please file one for Ge

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: AbortSignal.any()

Thanks! On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 7:21 AM Rick Byers wrote: > LGTM3 > > Thanks for ensuring the behavior changes are behind a kill-switch! > > Rick > > On Wed, May 31, 2023, 5:10 a.m. Yoav Weiss wrote: > >> LGTM2 (% Mike's question) >> >> On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 5:04 AM Mike West wrote: >> >>> L

[blink-dev] Intent to Prototype: Conservative page freezing on desktop

Contact emailsfdo...@chromium.org, shase...@chromium.org Explainer https://docs.google.com/document/d/1wAKlysswBe5GHxUjYNMfzdJTIIaHUm2nZAIOW1POw0I/edit?usp=sharing Specificationhttps://wicg.github.io/page-lifecycle Summary On a page that has been hidden and silent for >15 minutes, each agent ca

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Non-composed Mouse and Pointer enter/leave events

Awesome, great to see Mustaq. Thanks for the follow-up! On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 1:27 PM Mustaq Ahmed wrote: > > Thanks for improving interop here Mustaq! > > An update on the Interop front: most of the WPTs resolved >

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Non-composed Mouse and Pointer enter/leave events

> Thanks for improving interop here Mustaq! An update on the Interop front: most of the WPTs resolved

[blink-dev] Re: PSA: Virtual web test suits now have expiration dates

For those who don't know already, the virtual test suites config file is located at //third_party/blink/web_tests/VirtualTestSuites. On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 10:23 AM Weizhong Xia wrote: > Hi Folks > > This is a reminder as we are approaching July 1st, 2023, the initial > expiration date I set fo

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Add value argument to URLSearchParams's has() and delete()

Hey Philip! In my initial testing, I didn't see any observable change in site behavior, but I shall confirm once again! As for the kill switch and use counter should I update my existing CL to include these or make a new one containing the counter to just measure the effects? On Wednesday, M

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Non-composed Mouse and Pointer enter/leave events

LGTM3 /Daniel On 2023-05-31 17:51, Chris Harrelson wrote: LGTM2 On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 8:26 AM Rick Byers wrote: Thanks for improving interop here Mustaq! It looks like this is behind an experimental Runtim

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Non-composed Mouse and Pointer enter/leave events

LGTM2 On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 8:26 AM Rick Byers wrote: > Thanks for improving interop here Mustaq! > > It looks like > this > is behind an experimental RuntimeEnabledFeature > "NonComposedEnterLeaveEvents", which I assume you'l

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS overlay property

LGTM3 Joey, can make sure to respond on https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/829 as well? I don't think the feedback necessitates changes, but it would be great to make it clear on the issue. On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 5:59 PM Mike West wrote: > I agree that https://github.com/w3c/csswg

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Partitioning Storage, Service Workers, and Communication APIs

LGTM3 with all the caveats about careful rollout discussed above. -mike On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 5:39 PM Mike Taylor wrote: > OK - let's consider this I2S officially revived. Looking for a 3rd LGTM to > begin shipping in M115. > > We have implemented 3rd party deprecation trial support for M115

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS font-variant-position property

LGTM3 /Daniel On 2023-05-31 17:38, Mike Taylor wrote: LGTM2 On 5/31/23 10:30 AM, Rick Byers wrote: Yes, 100%. Very good point, I was definitely over-simplifying the measurement challenge. Thanks David! On Tue, May 30, 2023, 5:47 p.m. David Baron wrote: I was trying to avoid being too

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS font-variant-position property

LGTM2 On 5/31/23 10:30 AM, Rick Byers wrote: Yes, 100%. Very good point, I was definitely over-simplifying the measurement challenge. Thanks David! On Tue, May 30, 2023, 5:47 p.m. David Baron wrote: I was trying to avoid being too specific about what would be worth measuring both bec

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Non-composed Mouse and Pointer enter/leave events

Thanks for improving interop here Mustaq! It looks like this is behind an experimental RuntimeEnabledFeature "NonComposedEnterLeaveEvents", which I assume you'll just set to 'stable' once approved, right? That way if we do discove

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: HTTPS Upgrades

-mike On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 4:17 PM Rick Byers wrote: > As a long-time user of HTTPS-first mode, I'm excited to see this ship ASAP! > > On Wed, May 31, 2023, 5:29 a.m. 'Mike West' via blink-dev < > blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: > >> On Fri, May 26, 2023 at 1:32 AM Chris Thompson >> wrote: >

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS font-variant-position property

Yes, 100%. Very good point, I was definitely over-simplifying the measurement challenge. Thanks David! On Tue, May 30, 2023, 5:47 p.m. David Baron wrote: > I was trying to avoid being too specific about what would be worth > measuring both because I haven't taken the time to think through all th

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: AbortSignal.any()

LGTM3 Thanks for ensuring the behavior changes are behind a kill-switch! Rick On Wed, May 31, 2023, 5:10 a.m. Yoav Weiss wrote: > LGTM2 (% Mike's question) > > On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 5:04 AM Mike West wrote: > >> LGTM1. >> >> The risks you point to seem minor, and following along with Safari

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: HTTPS Upgrades

As a long-time user of HTTPS-first mode, I'm excited to see this ship ASAP! On Wed, May 31, 2023, 5:29 a.m. 'Mike West' via blink-dev < blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: > On Fri, May 26, 2023 at 1:32 AM Chris Thompson > wrote: > >> On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 3:36 AM Mike West wrote: >> >>> I am enth

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: First-party sets

Sweet, thanks Chris! On Tuesday, 30 May 2023 at 16:36:34 UTC+2 Chris Fredrickson wrote: > Hi Andrey, > > We're still collecting metrics at 1%. We want to be sure that this feature > does not regress core web vitals , which is why > we're taking our time and analyzing th

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: BYOB support for Fetch

Thanks for aligning with Firefox here! On Fri, May 26, 2023 at 5:32 AM Nidhi Jaju wrote: > Contact emailsnidhij...@chromium.org > > ExplainerNone > > Specificationhttps://fetch.spec.whatwg.org/#http-network-fetch > > Summary > > Makes Response.body be a readable byte stream instead of a "default

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: BYOB support for Fetch

LGTM1. Following along with Mozilla's long-standing implementation SGTM, and obviates the need for a TAG review. It would be ideal to file an official standards position issue with WebKit, however, to make sure they understand that we do intend to ship this and can incorporate that information int

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: HTTPS Upgrades

On Fri, May 26, 2023 at 1:32 AM Chris Thompson wrote: > On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 3:36 AM Mike West wrote: > >> I am enthusiastic about this (and not just because it should allow us to >> deprecate/remove `Upgrade-Insecure-Requests`). A few comments inline: >> >> On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 1:13 AM Ch

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: AbortSignal.any()

LGTM2 (% Mike's question) On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 5:04 AM Mike West wrote: > LGTM1. > > The risks you point to seem minor, and following along with Safari's > implementation makes it more likely that we can land the feature in a way > that sticks. Do you have insight into Mozilla's implementatio

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: AbortSignal.any()

LGTM1. The risks you point to seem minor, and following along with Safari's implementation makes it more likely that we can land the feature in a way that sticks. Do you have insight into Mozilla's implementation progress? -mike On Fri, May 26, 2023 at 12:47 AM Scott Haseley wrote: > Contact

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: timestamp field on RTCEncodedVideoFrameMetadata

Bubbling this up as I suspect it has fallen through the process again. Is there any further information or actions I need to take here to unblock? Thanks Tony Den fre 12 maj 2023 11:35Tony Herre skrev: > Re TAG, the original review for this API was > https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/is